Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Minnesota for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Minnesota only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Minnesota (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Eric Harl (NPI 1336297043)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Eric Harl
Address	1415 Saint Francis Ave
City	Shakopee
State	MN
ZIP	55379
Taxonomy	Medical Physician Assistant
NPI Enumerated	January 8, 2007

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$47.4K
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

ERIC HARL is a Medical Physician Assistant based in SHAKOPEE, MN with an NPI enumerated on 2007-01-08 (~19 years ago), indicating long tenure in the Medicare program. The provider’s billing profile is compact and centered on office-based ambulatory care services rather than hospital or institutional practice lines.

This provider’s publicly reported Medicare revenue totals $47.4K while there is no Medicaid billing on file, so the practice is effectively single-payer at the state level and relies entirely on Medicare for the observed public revenue. The absence of any Medicaid activity suggests limited participation in state Medicaid networks or a patient mix concentrated in Medicare-eligible populations.

Revenue concentration is high: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes by revenue account for 72.6% of total Medicare revenue. Those top three codes are 99214 ($19K, 40.0%), 99213 ($11.9K, 24.9%), and 17000 ($3.7K, 7.7%), showing that two established-patient E/M codes plus premalignant lesion destruction drive the majority of reported Medicare income.

The code mix points to a primary care/office-based practice that performs frequent dermatologic procedures. High claim counts for E/M codes (99214: 268 claims, $71 avg paid/claim; 99213: 242 claims, $49 avg paid/claim) together with procedural codes such as 17000 (115 claims, $32 avg), 17003 (257 claims, $4 avg), 11104 (30 claims, $73 avg), 11102 (13 claims, $59 avg), and 11400 (21 claims, $52 avg) indicate routine skin lesion management and minor surgical work in the office setting.

Competitive standing for core E/M services is modest but not negligible: 99214 ranks #114038 of 479517 providers nationally (76th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code) and 99213 ranks #78768 of 457151 providers nationally (83th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume for this code). These ranks imply the provider maintains a respectable national volume for established-patient visits, but is not a dominant national outlier.

Procedural competitiveness is mixed across dermatologic and minor-procedure codes. 17000 ranks #13107 of 21879 (40th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), 17003 ranks #13896 of 19643 (29th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), and 11104 ranks #1597 of 6872 (76th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume), while 11102 ranks #18353 of 18797 (2th percentile; typical, unremarkable volume). This pattern indicates some relative strength in destructive lesion work and excisions but very low relative volume for tangential shave biopsy (11102).

Operationally, the presence of a large count of low-valued add-on units is notable: 17003 appears 257 times with an average paid per claim of $4 and contributes $1K (2.2% of the provider’s Medicare revenue). That combination (high frequency, low per-unit payment) suggests multiple lesion treatments per encounter with limited incremental revenue per lesion, while codes like 12031 (17 claims, $169 avg, $2.9K revenue) reflect fewer but higher-paid procedural events such as intermediate wound repairs.

From a business perspective the absolute Medicare footprint is small at $47.4K total revenue, which constrains scale and negotiating leverage; coupled with no Medicaid billing, the practice has limited payer diversification in the public programs. Preventive-care activity is present (G0438: 16 claims, $139 avg; G0439: 21 claims, $109 avg) but G0439 ranks in the 16th percentile nationally, indicating that annual wellness visits are a minor component of this provider’s Medicare panel relative to peers and could be an incremental growth opportunity if desired.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

11 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	270	$70	$19K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	240	$50	$11.9K
17000	The provider destroys a premalignant lesion using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code reports the destruction of the first or only lesion.	120	$30	$3.7K
12031	This CPT® code is used for the intermediate repair of wounds to the scalp, axillae, trunk, and/or extremities (excluding hands and feet) that are 2.5 cm or less in size.	20	$170	$2.9K
G0439	Annual wellness visit, includes a personalized prevention plan of service (pps), subsequent visit	20	$110	$2.3K
G0438	Annual wellness visit; includes a personalized prevention plan of service (pps), initial visit	20	$140	$2.2K
11104	The provider biopsies a skin lesion using a punch technique with a sharp hollow instrument; punch biopsies are commonly performed for deeper circular skin lesions.	30	$70	$2.2K
11400	The provider excises a noncancerous lesion, excluding a skin tag, of 0.5 cm or less in diameter, including margins, from the skin of the trunk, arms, or legs.	20	$50	$1.1K
17003	In this add–on procedure, the provider destroys a premalignant lesion using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code is appropriate for the second through…	260	$1	$1K
11102	The provider biopsies a single skin lesion using a tangential (side–ways) approach; he shaves off the lesion or scoops it out with a knife or curette.	10	$60	$770

Showing 1–10 of 11

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 11 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Minnesota Distribution

Eric Harl — 1 of 11 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Minnesota

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

11 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
99214	18	10,100	70	$80	$8.1K
G0439	14	2,290	40	$120	$6.9K
17000	1	400	120	$30	$5.3K
11102	2	330	70	$50	$5.2K
99213	18	9,120	50	$50	$4K
12031	1	10	10	$160	$3.6K
G0438	5	490	20	$160	$3.3K
11400	1	10	40	$80	$2.9K
17003	1	350	380	$1	$2.1K
11104	2	120	20	$70	$1.5K

Showing 1–10 of 11

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Eric Harl, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Nadine Miller	MN	Medical Physician Assistant	$50.6K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Eric Harl, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Twin Cities Health	MN	Mental Health Counselor	$0	$16.7M
Universal Health Services LLC	MN	Home Health Registered Nurse	$0	$15.2M
St Francis Regional Medical Center	MN	General Acute Care Hospital	$0	$13M
Suburban Emergency Associates, P.A.	MN	Nurse Practitioner	$0	$5.2M
Northstar Regional	MN	Clinical Medical Laboratory	$22.6K	$2.7M
Mohamed Khattab	MN	Radiation Oncology Physician	$358.1K	$0
Edwin Bogonko	MN	Internal Medicine Physician	$110.3K	$0
Brayton Kiedrowski	MN	Sports Medicine (Family Medicine) Physician	$60.4K	$0
Wendy Bergeron	MN	Family Medicine Physician	$52.3K	$0
Joelle Weir	MN	Nurse Practitioner	$45.6K	$0

Eric Harl — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Eric Harl — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Eric Harl — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Eric Harl — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References