Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or California for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to California only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. California (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Patrick Black (NPI 1326439159)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Patrick Black
Address	1676 E 6th St
City	Beaumont
State	CA
ZIP	92223
Taxonomy	Physical Therapist
NPI Enumerated	February 16, 2015

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$14M
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

PATRICK BLACK is effectively a Medicare-focused physical therapy provider: reported lifetime Medicare revenue is $14M while there is no Medicaid billing on file, indicating a single-payer footprint in available claims data and limited or no engagement with Medicaid-covered patients. The NPI was enumerated on 2015-02-16 (~11 years ago), which supports a multi-year operating history to generate the reported Medicare volume.

Revenue concentration is extremely high: the precomputed top 3 Medicare codes account for 81.9% of this provider's total Medicare revenue, meaning a small set of procedures dominates financial performance and operational throughput. Analysts should treat changes in utilization or reimbursement for those codes as having outsized impact on overall revenue.

The provider’s top Medicare code by revenue is Q4262, contributing $6.5M (46.3% of Medicare revenue) with 6.3K claims and an average paid/claim of $1037; its national rank for Q4262 is #20 of 141 (86th percentile), which positions the provider as a sizable but not dominant national participant for that code. The combination of high absolute revenue and a strong percentile rank suggests deep specialization or focused service lines tied to Q4262 procedures.

Q4188 and Q4281 together account for a further concentrated share: Q4188 generated $2.7M (19.3% of Medicare revenue) with 3.6K claims and ranks #4 of 47 (93th percentile), while Q4281 yielded $2.3M (16.2% of Medicare revenue) with 1.9K claims and ranks #8 of 33 (78th percentile). These ranks indicate unusually high relative activity for Q4188 and elevated activity for Q4281 versus national peers, reinforcing that a narrow set of allograft/skin substitute add-on products drives the practice.

Code-level mix and descriptions indicate a wound-care/skin-substitute service line: the largest revenue codes (Q4262, Q4188, Q4281, Q4236 and Q4248) are all per-square-centimeter skin/substitute or amniotic membrane add-ons, and CPT 15271/15275/15272 entries reflect usage of skin substitutes and grafting. This profile suggests the practice concentrates on advanced wound management, grafting procedures, and sale/implantation of amniotic or membrane products rather than routine therapeutic exercise.

There are notable statistical outliers in specific CPTs: 15271 is flagged as an “extreme outlier” nationally (533 claims, $68.8K revenue; ranks #18 of 1157, 99th percentile), indicating exceptionally high utilization of that particular skin substitute graft code compared with peers. Similarly, 15272 is described as “notably above typical national volume” (273 claims, $5.5K; ranks #7 of 88, 93th percentile), which supports the view of specialization in larger-area grafting sessions. These labels imply the provider operates at much higher intensity for select graft codes than most national peers.

Competitive standing is mixed across codes: for Q4188 the provider is a top-tier national outlier (rank #4/47, 93th percentile), while for several other codes—Q4262 (86th percentile) and Q4281 (78th percentile)—the provider is a high-volume but not leading national participant. For lower-revenue codes such as 15275 and 97110 the provider sits in much more typical percentile ranges, suggesting concentrated investment in a narrow set of higher-revenue services rather than broad-based service volume.

From a payor-strategy perspective, the absence of Medicaid billing means any payer-contracted strategies or risk-sharing with state programs would be minimal or non-existent based on the claims on file; commercial or Medicare Advantage arrangements (not shown here) would be the likeliest levers if the provider seeks to monetize its specialized wound-care services. Analysts should treat this profile as a Medicare-centric specialty operation with concentrated product/code mix exposure.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

9 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
Q4262	Dual layer impax membrane, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	6,250	$1,040	$6.5M
Q4188	Amnioarmor, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	3,630	$740	$2.7M
Q4281	Barrera sl or barrera dl, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	1,870	$1,220	$2.3M
Q4236	Carepatch, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	2,420	$940	$2.3M
Q4248	Dermacyte amniotic membrane allograft, per square centimeter (add-on, list separately in addition to primary procedure)	240	$750	$175.8K
15271	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the patient’s trunk, arms, and/or legs up to an area of 100 cm2. This code covers up to the first 25 cm2.	530	$130	$68.8K
15275	The provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover wounds on the face, scalp, eyelids, mouth, neck, ears, orbits, genitalia, hands, feet, and/or multiple digits, up to…	120	$140	$15.7K
15272	At the same session that the provider uses a skin substitute, such as an allograft or xenograft, to cover the wounds on the patient’s trunk, arms, and/or legs up to an area of 100 scm2, the provider…	270	$20	$5.5K
97110	Therapeutic exercise is a form of physical therapy that utilizes specially designed exercises and activities to help patients gain better mobility and fitness levels. Normally used on patients with…	140	$20	$2.7K

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 9 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. California Distribution

Patrick Black — 1 of 9 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — California

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

9 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
Q4236	12	20	3,950	$960	$6.2M
Q4262	2	10	2,370	$1,030	$3.8M
Q4281	4	20	940	$1,210	$1.9M
Q4188	2	30	1,120	$750	$1.1M
Q4248	6	10	810	$810	$905.4K
15271	10	170	110	$110	$18.6K
97110	5,609	6,720	490	$20	$17.1K
15275	31	120	60	$120	$12.1K
15272	5	30	90	$20	$3K

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Patrick Black, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Richard Park	CA	Internal Medicine Physician	$31.7M	$0
Nyrie Austin	NJ	Family Nurse Practitioner	$15.9M	$8.8K
Owen Ellington	TX	Hematology & Oncology Physician	$11.5M	$0
Joseph Palumbo	WV	Emergency Medicine Physician	$7.9M	$44.3K
Shelita Jones	TX	Family Nurse Practitioner	$6.7M	$0
Kellie King	TX	Family Nurse Practitioner	$5.3M	$0
Jamie Kate Adoc	CA	Family Nurse Practitioner	$4.7M	$0
Raymond Wawrowski	OH	Physician Assistant	$4.7M	$0
Thuy Vo	CA	Family Nurse Practitioner	$4.4M	$0
Siya Oloso	TX	Family Nurse Practitioner	$4.1M	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Patrick Black, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Beaumont Radiology Services LLC	CA	Radiology Clinic/Center	$217K	$60

Patrick Black — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Patrick Black — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Patrick Black — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Patrick Black — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References