Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerNPI Medicare & MedicaidPeter Noseworthy
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    Peter Noseworthy — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

    NPI 1295704245 · Rochester, MN · Cardiovascular Disease Physician

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Peter Noseworthy — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Peter Noseworthy is a cardiovascular disease physician provider located in Rochester, Minnesota. This profile covers 22 Medicare and 0 Medicaid CPT/HCPCS procedure codes, with claims volume, average reimbursement, and total revenue by code, benchmarked against other providers billing the same services.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 9

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    Provider details (source: NPPES NPI Registry)

    FieldValue
    Entity TypeIndividual
    OrganizationPeter Noseworthy
    Address200 1st St Sw
    CityRochester
    StateMN
    ZIP55905
    TaxonomyCardiovascular Disease Physician
    NPI EnumeratedMarch 14, 2006

    Lifetime revenue by payer source (source: CMS Medicare & Medicaid claims data)

    Payer SourceTotal Paid
    Medicare$1.1M
    Medicaid$0

    Key Findings

    This provider’s Medicare business is overwhelmingly driven by remote cardiac monitoring: code 93229 accounts for $1M of Medicare revenue and represents 92.1% of the provider’s total Medicare revenue, and the precomputed top-3 codes account for 96.0% of lifetime Medicare revenue. The code mix (93229, 93271, 93656) indicates a practice focused on ambulatory ECG/event recorder services and occasional advanced electrophysiology procedures, with a heavy operational emphasis on device-based rhythm monitoring rather than high-volume office E/M or inpatient cardiology services.

    Medicare revenue concentration is extreme: the single code 93229 supplies the vast majority of the $1.1M in total Medicare revenue and, together with the other top codes, produces 96.0% of lifetime Medicare receipts. This level of dependence on a small set of monitoring and device-interpretation CPT/HCPCS codes signals limited diversification of billable services within Medicare.

    Payer mix is effectively single-payer: the profile shows Total Medicare revenue of $1.1M and no Medicaid billing on file, so this provider operates without recorded Medicaid participation and is functionally Medicare-dependent for the documented public-payer volume. Analysts should treat any Medicaid-related comparisons as not applicable for this NPIs’ observed activity.

    Competitive standing for the dominant code is nationally prominent: the provider ranks #13 of 2091 for 93229 (99th percentile), indicating unusually high national volume for implantation/monitoring of wearable ECG devices relative to peers. By contrast, other top codes show mixed competitive positions — 93271 ranks #9 of 34 (76th percentile) which is solid within a small national cohort, while 93656 ranks #1994 of 2048 (0th percentile), indicating negligible volume in comprehensive EP ablation compared with national peers.

    Operational profile implied by code-level details: a high volume of technician-level and remote monitoring services (large counts for 93229: 1.5K claims; 93296: 453 claims; 93294: 338 claims) suggests this practice likely runs or partners with an established device monitoring program staffed to place, instruct, receive, and process transmissions. Lower-paid, high-count technical codes (for example 93296 at $13 avg paid/claim and 453 claims) reinforce that much revenue is generated via volume of remote device services rather than high-dollar procedural work.

    Tenure is long-standing: the NPI was enumerated on 2006-03-14 (approximately 20 years ago), which supports the likelihood that the provider has had time to build a specialized monitoring workflow and referral relationships underpinning the concentrated revenue mix.

    Code-level statistical context is mixed and mostly within expected ranges: several monitoring-related codes (93229 at 99th percentile; 93270 at 99th percentile) are described as typical, unremarkable volume for the code despite their high national rank, indicating the provider’s volumes are large but consistent with common practice patterns for remote monitoring. Conversely, several procedural codes are at very low national standing (e.g., 93656 at 0th percentile), confirming that invasive EP work is not a material contributor to this provider’s billed activity.

    Revenue-per-claim profile shows a high-dollar outlier and many low-dollar technical services: 93229 has a high average paid per claim ($672) driving the $1M revenue figure, while many related monitoring/interpretation codes pay in the teens or single digits per claim (e.g., 93296 $13 avg, 93294 $17 avg, 93010 $6 avg). This mix implies revenue concentration both by unit value (one high-paying service) and by volume of low-margin technical services supporting remote monitoring operations.

    Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

    Medicare revenue breakdown by CPT/HCPCS procedure code.

    View: Bar Chart1 / 2

    Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

    The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

    22 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeDescriptionClaimsAvg PaidRevenue
    93229In this procedure, the provider, typically a technician, places a wearable electrocardiographic monitoring device on the patient, instructs him in its use, and monitors the transmissions, to detect…1,520$670$1M
    93271In this service, the provider monitors the patient’s heart rhythm while the patient is experiencing cardiac symptoms. He places electrocardiogram leads of an event recorder on the patient's chest,…310$120$35.6K
    93656A comprehensive electrophysiologic (EP) study involves the provider placing wire electrodes in the heart to measure electrical activity. The provider punctures the thin wall between the heart…10$700$7.7K
    93296The technician gathers data, for a period of up to 90 days, from a patient’s single, dual, multiple lead, or leadless pacemaker system or implantable defibrillator system by remotely accessing the…450$10$5.9K
    93294The provider, a physician or other qualified health care professional, remotely analyzes, for a period up to 90 days, the function of a single, dual, multiple lead, or leadless pacemaker system,…340$20$5.7K
    93010The provider interprets and reports on the results of a routine 12–lead (or more) electrocardiogram.940$10$5.6K
    93224In this procedure, the provider applies an electrocardiographic, or ECG recorder, to a patient for up to 48 hours to detect abnormal heart rates and rhythms. He analyzes, compiles, and interprets the…90$40$3.9K
    93000The provider records the electrical conduction of the heart to examine any abnormality in its functioning, based on signals from at least 12 leads, wires that connect the recording device to…410$10$3.7K
    93280In this service, the provider performs a face to face evaluation and then optimally adjusts the existing parameters of an already implanted dual lead pacemaker system.  He changes various operating…70$50$3.2K
    99213The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…50$70$3.2K

    Showing 1–10 of 22

    Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

    How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 22 CPT/HCPCS codes.

    View: State1 / 2

    Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

    22 rows

    CPT/HCPCS CodeRankProvider CountMedian ClaimsAvg PaidAverage Revenue
    93229110770$670$518.2K
    93271110310$110$35.5K
    G2066284060$60$17.8K
    93656384020$710$14.2K
    9322492090$50$12.1K
    932963760530$20$11K
    932944880390$20$7.8K
    93280539080$40$4.7K
    992134,5859,12050$50$4K
    932955080140$20$3.6K

    Showing 1–10 of 22

    Related Providers

    Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Peter Noseworthy, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

    ProviderStateTaxonomyMedicare RevenueMedicaid Revenue
    Mayo Collaborative Services, IncMNClinical Medical Laboratory$6.5M$39.2M
    Mayo Clinic Health System-southeast Minnesota RegionMNGeneral Acute Care Hospital$0$37.5M
    Mayo Clinic Health System-southwest Minnesota RegionMNGeneral Acute Care Hospital$0$28.5M
    Mayo ClinicMNClinical Medical Laboratory$12.2M$15.2M
    Mayo Clinic Health System-southwest Minnesota RegionMNMulti-Specialty Clinic/Center$0$24.3M
    Mayo Clinic Health System-southeast Minnesota RegionMNMulti-Specialty Clinic/Center$0$21.8M
    Mayo Clinic Health System-southeast Minnesota RegionMNMulti-Specialty Clinic/Center$0$13.7M
    Mayo Clinic Health System-southeast Minnesota RegionMNSubstance Abuse Rehabilitation Facility$0$12.6M
    Mayo Clinic ArizonaAZGeneral Acute Care Hospital$0$12.5M
    Mayo Clinic JacksonvilleFLClinical Medical Laboratory$9.3M$105.3K

    Nearby Providers

    Other providers in the same ZIP code as Peter Noseworthy, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

    ProviderStateTaxonomyMedicare RevenueMedicaid Revenue
    Mayo ClinicMNMulti-Specialty Clinic/Center$0$74.3M
    Mayo ClinicMNMulti-Specialty Clinic/Center$0$10.9M
    Mayo Foundation For Medical Education & ResearchMNDurable Medical Equipment & Medical Supplies$9.3K$2.8M
    Vidhu KaushikMNClinical Pathology/Laboratory Medicine Physician$59.6K$1.9M
    Roberto Leon FerreMNMedical Oncology Physician$1.3M$0
    Daniel ChildsMNMedical Oncology Physician$1.1M$0
    Robert JacobsonMNPediatrics Physician$975.6K$0
    Brittany SiontisMNMedical Oncology Physician$960.6K$0
    Sani KizilbashMNMedical Oncology Physician$946.7K$0
    Timothy HobdayMNMedical Oncology Physician$931.3K$0

    Frequently Asked Questions

    References

    1. 1.Medicare Physician & Other Practitioner by Provider and Service. CMS.gov.Provider-level Medicare Part B utilization and payment data.
    2. 2.NPPES NPI Registry. CMS.gov.National Provider Identifier registry used for provider enumeration and taxonomy metadata.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Medicare Revenue by CPT/HCPCS Code
    Claims Volume vs. Minnesota Distribution
    Peter Noseworthy — 4 of 22 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)
    p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier
    Rank Distribution — Minnesota