Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Alaska for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Alaska only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Alaska (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Evan Wolf (NPI 1205801586)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Evan Wolf
Address	4505 E Greenstreet Cir
City	Wasilla
State	AK
ZIP	99654
Taxonomy	Ophthalmology Physician
NPI Enumerated	February 21, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$425K
Medicaid	$0

Key Findings

This provider’s billing footprint is effectively single‑payer: total Medicare revenue is $425K and there is no Medicaid billing on file (none). That concentration means Medicare policy and reimbursement trends will disproportionately affect the provider’s revenue mix.

Revenue is highly concentrated in a small set of Medicare services: the precomputed top three Medicare codes (66984, 66982, 99215) account for 75.8% of the provider’s total Medicare revenue. Within that trio, 66984 alone represents 56.3% of Medicare revenue (457 claims, $524 avg paid/claim, $239.5K revenue), underscoring how dependent the practice is on a single surgical procedure.

The code mix indicates an ophthalmology practice oriented around cataract surgery and its perioperative care: high‑revenue surgical codes 66984 and 66982 are the primary drivers, supported by postoperative laser capsulotomy 66821 (94 claims, $366 avg paid/claim, $34.4K revenue) and preoperative biometric testing 92136 (508 claims, $39 avg paid/claim, $19.8K revenue). This pattern — dominant cataract procedures plus associated diagnostics and laser follow‑up — is consistent with a surgery-focused ophthalmology operation rather than a general multispecialty clinic.

Competitive standing is mixed across codes: for the largest surgical code 66984 the provider ranks #3104 of 15965 (81th percentile) and for complex cataract 66982 ranks #790 of 4580 (83th percentile), both described as typical, unremarkable volumes nationally; by contrast the E/M code 99215 ranks #6809 of 145531 (95th percentile) and is labeled notably above typical national volume. In practical terms, the provider is a modest participant in cataract surgery at the national level but generates unusually high high‑complexity E/M volume relative to peers.

The provider shows above‑typical reliance on certain diagnostic and imaging services: 92136 (biometry) ranks in the 93th percentile nationally and accounted for $19.8K (508 claims, $39 avg paid/claim), while corneal thickness imaging 76514 ranks in the 94th percentile (121 claims, $10 avg paid/claim, $1.2K revenue). These higher percentiles for specific ancillary tests suggest the practice routinely performs preoperative and corneal assessments, supporting surgical throughput and candidate selection for intraocular lens procedures.

Tenure and stability: the NPI was enumerated 2006-02-21 (~20 years ago), indicating a long‑standing presence in the market. Combined with the concentrated surgical revenue mix, the longevity suggests an established cataract surgery practice with a stable referral or patient base in its community.

Operational and payer‑risk implication: because 75.8% of Medicare revenue is concentrated in three codes and Medicaid revenue is absent (none), the practice faces revenue risk from any declines in Medicare cataract volume or reimbursement changes for those specific CPTs. Analysts should note that market shifts affecting cataract case volume, local competition for surgical cases, or policy changes to Medicare surgical payments would disproportionately affect this provider’s financial performance.

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
66984	The provider inserts an artificial lens after removing an extracapsular cataract by aspiration or use of ultrasonic waves. This procedure is done without the use of an endoscopic laser probe to…	460	$520	$239.5K
66982	The provider inserts an intraocular lens prosthesis after extracapsular cataract extraction using complex techniques and devices. He may perform this by means of an iris expansion device, providing…	60	$730	$45.5K
99215	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a high level of medical decision making, and/or the…	280	$140	$37.3K
66821	The provider removes the haziness from the capsule of the eye using a laser for a patient with a secondary membranous cataract.	90	$370	$34.4K
92136	The provider uses a noninvasive method to measure the patient’s eye or eyes to get information that the provider then uses to calculate the appropriate power for an intraocular lens (IOL). Selecting…	510	$40	$19.8K
99205	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a high level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	70	$170	$11.4K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	90	$70	$6.2K
92134	The provider performs computerized diagnostic imaging of the retina in the posterior segment (back part) of the eye, interprets the data, and provides a report. The service may be on one or both eyes.	170	$40	$6.2K
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	50	$100	$5.2K
92083	The provider may use one or more methods to determine the extent of a patient's visual field of one or both eyes; he interprets the results and prepares a report. Report this code for an extended…	90	$50	$4.7K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 19 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Alaska Distribution

Evan Wolf — 3 of 19 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Alaska

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
66984	4	60	40	$640	$86.7K
66982	3	10	40	$820	$34.5K
99214	779	1,210	90	$100	$16.2K
66821	4	30	30	$280	$13.9K
92014	80	100	80	$90	$11.2K
99215	17	400	40	$150	$11K
99213	556	1,290	70	$70	$8.5K
99205	15	140	30	$190	$7.4K
92136	2	20	120	$30	$6.6K
99204	431	460	30	$140	$6.1K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Evan Wolf, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Wolf Eye Center, Inc.	AK	Ophthalmology Physician	$0	$3.8M
Lauren Evans	AZ	Optometrist	$106.2K	$0
Amber Mayberry	AK	Optometrist	$102.1K	$0
Austin Anderson	AK	Optometrist	$93.5K	$0
Jessica Thornton	AK	Optometrist	$70.6K	$0
Yennhi Tran	AK	Optometrist	$66.7K	$0
Mark Lantz	AK	Optometrist	$57.6K	$0
Danica Lantz	AK	Optometrist	$49K	$0
Jacob Frank	AK	Optometrist	$40.5K	$0

Nearby Providers

Other providers in the same ZIP code as Evan Wolf, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Mat-su Services For Children & Adults	AK	Developmentally Disabled Services Day Training Agency	$0	$34.2M
Southcentral Foundation	AK	Multi-Specialty Clinic/Center	$0	$30.7M
Mat - Su Health Services Inc.	AK	Mental Health Clinic/Center (Including Community Mental Health Center)	$0	$24.4M
Set Free Alaska, Inc.	AK	Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Facility	$0	$21.5M
Hope Community Resources Inc	AK	Respite Care	$0	$19.3M
Community Medical Services Montana Private LLC	AK	Methadone Clinic	$395.9K	$18.9M
Alaska Home Care	AK	Home Health Agency	$0	$14.1M
True North Recovery Inc	AK	Community/Behavioral Health Agency	$0	$11.5M
Pediatric Dentistry Of Alaska	AK	Dental Clinic/Center	$0	$11.4M
Backcountry Therapeutics LLC	AK	Occupational Therapist	$0	$11M

Evan Wolf — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Evan Wolf — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Evan Wolf — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Evan Wolf — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Key Findings

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Nearby Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References