Why are Medicare and Medicaid shown separately instead of combined?

They come from two different CMS data sources with no shared claim identifier, so they can't be reconciled into one number without double-counting or guessing. Every table and chart on this page keeps them fully separate.

Why is there no private/commercial revenue figure?

Private and commercial payer data comes from Transparency in Coverage files, which only publish negotiated rates — not claims or utilization volume. Without a volume figure, no revenue number can be computed for any provider from that data.

What does "Rank" mean in the Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks tables?

For a given CPT/HCPCS code, it's this provider's position by claims volume among all providers billing that same code at that geography level (State, National, or Minnesota for Medicaid) — rank 1 means the highest claims volume for that code.

Why is the Medicaid comparison limited to Minnesota only?

Medicaid is administered per-state with no single national fee schedule, so a state or national comparison the way Medicare has one isn't available. Minnesota (this provider's own state) is the only grouping that's conceptually meaningful.

Why are the numbers rounded to the nearest 10?

To avoid implying more precision than the underlying data supports at a single-provider level. Ratios are kept precise since they're a relative comparison, not a volume or dollar figure.

How current is this data?

The Medicare and Medicaid tables are both single current snapshots, not refreshed on a recurring schedule yet.

Mimi Cho (NPI 1063449957)

Field	Value
Entity Type	Individual
Organization	Mimi Cho
Address	3316 W 66th St
City	Edina
State	MN
ZIP	55435
Taxonomy	Dermatology Physician
NPI Enumerated	June 27, 2006

Payer Source	Total Paid
Medicare	$106.8K
Medicaid	$0

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

The CPT/HCPCS codes generating the most Medicare revenue for this provider.

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Description	Claims	Avg Paid	Revenue
99214	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the…	440	$90	$38.2K
17110	The provider destroys benign lesions using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code reports the destruction of one to 14 lesions other than skin tags or…	180	$70	$12.9K
99213	The provider sees an established patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a low level of medical decision making, and/or the…	170	$60	$10.8K
17000	The provider destroys a premalignant lesion using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code reports the destruction of the first or only lesion.	270	$30	$8.7K
11301	The provider shaves off a single epidermal or dermal lesion of 0.6 to 1.0 cm in diameter from the skin of the trunk, arms, or legs.	90	$70	$6.4K
99204	The provider sees a new patient for an office visit or other outpatient visit involving evaluation and management. The visit involves a moderate level of medical decision making, and/or the provider…	30	$120	$3.9K
11302	The provider shaves off a single epidermal or dermal lesion of 1.1 to 2.0 cm in diameter from the skin of the trunk, arms, or legs.	40	$100	$3.5K
11311	The provider shaves off a single epidermal or dermal lesion of 0.6 to 1.0 cm in diameter from the face, ears, eyelids, nose, lips, or mucous membranes.	40	$80	$3.3K
17262	The provider destroys a malignant lesion on the trunk, arms, or legs using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. The malignant lesion is 1.1 cm to 2.0 cm in…	30	$130	$3.2K
17003	In this add–on procedure, the provider destroys a premalignant lesion using techniques such as chemosurgery, cryosurgery, electrosurgery, or others. This code is appropriate for the second through…	600	$10	$3K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

How this provider's Medicare billing volume and revenue compare to other providers nationally and within its state, across 19 CPT/HCPCS codes.

View: State1 / 2

Claims Volume vs. Minnesota Distribution

Mimi Cho — 1 of 19 codes billed far more than typical (above p95)

p5–p95 (all providers)p25–p75MedianThis providerOutlier

Rank Distribution — Minnesota

Full comparison — all codes billed, vs. state median

19 rows

CPT/HCPCS Code	Rank	Provider Count	Median Claims	Avg Paid	Average Revenue
99214	196	10,100	70	$80	$8.1K
12032	117	120	30	$180	$6.1K
17110	25	340	70	$70	$5.7K
17000	77	400	120	$30	$5.3K
17004	84	90	20	$120	$5.1K
11306	9	20	20	$80	$4.6K
99213	779	9,120	50	$50	$4K
11301	11	70	30	$70	$3.8K
99204	1,105	3,340	20	$110	$3.6K
11311	8	30	20	$80	$3.4K

Showing 1–10 of 19

Related Providers

Other providers that share a Tax Identification Number (TIN) with Mimi Cho, ranked by combined Medicare and Medicaid revenue.

Provider	State	Taxonomy	Medicare Revenue	Medicaid Revenue
Sachin Bhardwaj	MN	MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Physician	$567.2K	$0
Eugene Dulaney	AZ	Dermatopathology (Pathology) Physician	$336.3K	$0
Amanda Tschetter	MN	MOHS-Micrographic Surgery Physician	$284K	$0
Mark Wilke	MN	Dermatopathology (Pathology) Physician	$246.9K	$0
Caleb Creswell	MN	Dermatology Physician	$172.4K	$0
Jennifer Lee	MN	Dermatology Physician	$166.8K	$0
Michelle Bussmann	MN	Dermatology Physician	$156K	$0
Gregory Hannon	MN	Dermatology Physician	$139.5K	$0
Erika Reid	MN	Clinical & Laboratory Dermatological Immunology Physician	$127.6K	$0
Allison Hoffman	MN	Dermatology Physician	$118.3K	$0

Mimi Cho — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Mimi Cho — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Mimi Cho — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data

Sign up for Mimi Cho — Billing Profile & Reimbursement Data policy alerts

Medicare: Total Revenue Breakdown by CPT/HCPCS Code

Medicare: Complete Services Breakdown

Medicare: Competitive Analysis & Benchmarks

Related Providers

Frequently Asked Questions

References