Payment Policy: Sepsis Diagnosis
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for WellCare Policy CC.PP.073 alerts
Get alerted when Policy CC.PP.073 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
This policy governs coding validation and reimbursement review processes for inpatient facility claims with a sepsis diagnosis for WellCare members across all product types (adult inpatient encounters). It describes documentation requirements, clinical criteria used to validate sepsis, and pre- and post-pay audit practices.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage criteria for Sepsis diagnosis coding
Coverage criteria for sepsis diagnosis coding
Documentation by a physician or licensed independent practitioner in the inpatient medical record must support sepsis diagnoses for reimbursement. Covered when ALL of the following are met:
When baseline SOFA is not provided, the imputed baseline will be determined using current medical records and the SOFA tool.
Coding guidance and updates
| A41.9 | Sepsis, unspecified organism |
| R65.20 | Severe sepsis without septic shock |
| R65.21 | Severe sepsis with septic shock |
| T81.44XA | Sepsis following a procedure, initial encounter |
| T81.44XA | ICD-10 code added to ICD-10 coding table (document mentions addition) |
Provider actions, reviews, and regulatory considerations
Pre- and post-pay review and record request
Claims with a sepsis diagnosis will be reviewed on either a pre- or post-pay basis. When medical records are requested, certified professional coders and registered nurses will clinically validate the documentation to ensure the medical record contains the necessary information and that the diagnosis and procedures billed are supported by the clinical information, including medical interventions. If a billing error or unsupported diagnosis is identified, the Health Plan will issue an audit determination letter to the provider describing the determination and dispute instructions. Clinical validation reviews will be completed within 60 days from receipt of medical records. Explanation codes will be sent to the provider on the Explanation of Payment (EOP) at the conclusion of the review.
- Claims with sepsis diagnosis may be reviewed pre- or post-pay
- Medical records requested for validation; certified coders and RNs will review
- Audit determination letter and dispute instructions issued to provider when sepsis was diagnosed/billed in error
- Clinical validation completed within 60 days of receipt of records
- EOP explanation codes issued at conclusion of review
Explanation of Payment codes and outcomes
Example Explanation of Payment (EOP) codes and outcomes that may be used at the conclusion of sepsis reviews include both denial and pay outcomes. Examples (not all-inclusive) include: CPI02 — Denied after review: Incomplete Medical Records Received; CPI05 — Medical Records not Received; CPI07 — DENIED: Diagnosis not supported; CPI10 — DENIED: Incorrect sequencing of diagnosis codes; CPI11 — DENIED: Incorrect discharge status submitted; CPI13 — DENIED: Incorrect principal diagnosis; CPI14 — DENIED: Incorrect principal procedure; CPI16 — DENIED: Missing medical records; CPI17 — DENIED: Principal Diagnosis Inappropriately Coded; CPI18 — DENIED: Procedure Inappropriately Coded; CPI22 — DENIED: Documentation does not support services billed; CPI23 — DENIED: Duplicate services billed; CPI27 — DENIED: Incorrect billing of date of service; CPI28 — DENIED: Incorrect records submitted for review; CPI29 — DENIED: Information requested was not received from provider; CPI30 — DENIED: Information requested not received from the patient; CPI36 — DENIED: Unbundled procedure code; CPI42 — DENIED: Incorrect place of service; CPI60 — Incorrect provider address; IA — DENY: MEDICAL RECORDS NOT RECEIVED PER PREVIOUS REQUEST; IB — PAY: DRG PAYMENT INCREASE AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS; IC — PAY: DRG PAYMENT ADJUSTMENT AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS; IF — PAY: REINSTATE PAYMENT AFTER REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS; OI / QD / QF — PEND or PAY outcomes for DRG validation/audit as applicable.
- Denial examples: CPI02, CPI05, CPI07, CPI10, CPI11, CPI13, CPI14, CPI16, CPI17, CPI18, CPI22, CPI23, CPI27, CPI28, CPI29, CPI30, CPI36, CPI42, CPI60, IA
- Pay/adjustment examples: IB, IC, IF, QF
- Pend/audit examples: OI, QD — Medical records required for DRG validation audit
Regulatory and effective-date considerations
Providers must review and apply applicable CMS national coverage determinations (NCDs), local coverage determinations (LCDs), and any state Medicaid/Medicare provisions when using this policy. This payment policy is effective as of the date determined by the Health Plan; the posting date may not be the effective date. If there is a discrepancy between this policy's effective date and legal or regulatory requirements, law and regulation govern. The Health Plan may change, amend, or withdraw this payment policy at any time. This policy does not constitute medical advice or a guarantee of payment; providers remain responsible for exercising professional judgment and for complying with all plan-level coverage documents, state and federal requirements, and contractual terms.
- Review applicable CMS NCDs and LCDs (cms.gov) when applying this policy
- Comply with state Medicaid/Medicare provisions and plan-level coverage documents
- Policy effective date is set by the Health Plan; legal/regulatory requirements supersede if discrepant
- Health Plan may amend or withdraw this policy at any time
- Policy is guidance only — providers retain responsibility for clinical judgment and documentation
Key definitions
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.