Find policies, billing codes, payers, states, and providers
Sacroiliac Joint Fusion or Stabilization
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for univerahealthcare Policy 7.01.93 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 7.01.93 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines medical appropriateness criteria for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion/stabilization for treatment of lumbopelvic pain originating from the SIJ; applies to Univera Healthcare coverage determinations.
Annual review added new criteria for provocative physical examination maneuvers for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion and expanded cotinine testing methods for nicotine-free status.
Policy title changed to 'Sacroiliac Joint Fusion or Stabilization' and a new not medically necessary statement was added for minimally invasive procedures.
Summary-of-changes tracking was implemented.
Coverage Criteria
inv-01: Medical appropriateness criteria (Initial eligibility)
Minimally invasive SIJ fusion and stabilization is considered medically appropriate when ALL the following are met:
All conditions listed must be satisfied for coverage
inv-02: Coverage criteria for minimally invasive SIJ fusion
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Chiropractic adjustments may be additional but not substitute for physical therapy
inv-05: Coverage criteria for minimally invasive SIJ fusion (alternate cluster)
Covered when ALL of the following are met
NASS recommendation
Thrust tests may be avoided in pregnancy or connective tissue disorders
Documented by pain diary
inv-06: Coverage criteria for SIJ fusion
Covered when ALL of the following are met
documented on two separate occasions
therapeutic trial required prior to fusion
all imaging components required
must be documented
inv-03: Open SIJ fusion — medically appropriate criteria
Open SIJ fusion is considered medically appropriate when ALL of the following are met:
All listed conditions must be met for open SIJ fusion to be considered medically appropriate.
inv-04: Investigational indications
Open SIJ fusion is considered investigational for ALL the following indications:
Open SIJ fusion is investigational for each listed indication.
inv-07: Applicability and recent revisions
Policy updates and applicability notes
From product disclaimer.
Summary of changes 06/18/26.
Localized tenderness to palpation of similar severity over the greater trochanter, lumbar spine, or coccyx that would confound sacroiliac joint (SIJ) localization must be absent for coverage. The policy requires absence of such competing focal tenderness to support that pain is originating from the posterior SIJ/sacral sulcus rather than an alternative local source (e.g., trochanteric bursitis, lumbar paraspinal tenderness, coccygeal pain).
Any request that does not satisfy ALL required policy criteria will be considered not medically appropriate and may be denied. Additionally, procedures are not appropriate when anatomic or clinical conditions would prevent insertion of the required implants, and bilateral procedures performed on the same date of service are explicitly excluded.
Minimally invasive or percutaneous SIJ procedures performed without the intention to achieve fusion (commonly described as joint distraction or non-fusion techniques) are considered not medically necessary and are excluded from coverage.
Use of titanium triangular implants (and similar transfixing devices) is not medically appropriate for bilateral same‑day percutaneous procedures. The policy also lists multiple investigational exclusions and circumstances (such as use of implants that do NOT traverse/transfix the SIJ or presence of systemic arthropathy, infection, tumor, fracture, acute traumatic instability, or neural compression correlating with symptoms) under which these implants and procedures are considered investigational or inappropriate.
For confirmed urgent or emergent spine conditions, certain standard prior authorization criteria are waived. Specifically, when an urgent/emergent indication is documented with confirmatory imaging, requirements such as provider-directed non-surgical management and proof of smoking cessation are not required.
Generalized pain behavior or generalized pain disorders (for example, somatoform disorder or fibromyalgia) are exclusionary. Patients with these conditions are considered inappropriate candidates for SIJ fusion unless documentation reliably demonstrates they do not account for the presenting symptoms.
Presence of destructive lesions (such as tumor or infection), autoimmune arthropathy, or concomitant hip pathology that better explains the pain excludes coverage. Diagnostic imaging must exclude these conditions (SIJ CT/MRI to rule out destructive lesions/autoimmune arthropathy; AP pelvis radiograph to evaluate hip pathology; and lumbar spine CT/MRI to exclude alternative lumbar sources).
Services described by this medical policy are subject to the member's contract. If the member's product does not cover the service, the policy's medical necessity criteria do not apply and the service is excluded.
The policy states that use of titanium triangular implants for minimally invasive/percutaneous SIJ fusion is considered not medically appropriate when the request does not meet policy criteria, when implant insertion is prevented, for bilateral same‑date procedures, and for procedures performed without intent to fuse (joint distraction).
Procedures performed without the documented intent to fuse (joint distraction/non-fusion techniques) are not medically necessary. Similarly, open SIJ fusion performed without meeting ALL required criteria is considered not medically appropriate.
Open SIJ fusion is considered investigational for the listed indications: mechanical low back pain, sacroiliac joint syndrome, degenerative sacroiliac joint, and radicular pain syndrome. Requests for open SIJ fusion for these indications may be denied as investigational.
Cases that lack supportive symptoms, focused physical exam findings (including Fortin's point tenderness and a positive cluster of provocative tests), appropriate imaging that excludes other sources, or diagnostic injections demonstrating the required response are considered not medically justified for fusion. Absence of at least two image‑guided diagnostic intra‑articular SIJ blocks showing ≥75% pain reduction or failure to document the conservative care requirements are common reasons for denial.
The policy reiterates that generalized pain disorders (e.g., somatoform disorder, fibromyalgia) are considered not appropriate indications for SIJ fusion and are grounds for noncoverage.
A new not medically necessary policy statement was added for minimally invasive procedures during the annual review. The June 18, 2026 summary notes additions to provocative physical exam criteria and expanded cotinine testing methods for nicotine-free status; see the policy for full details.
Coding
| 27278 | Arthrodesis, sacroiliac joint, percutaneous or minimally invasive, with image guidance, includes obtaining bone graft when performed, unilateral; placement of intra-articular device(s), without cortical piercing (effective 01/01/26) (Replacing code 0775T) |
| 0775T | Arthrodesis, sacroiliac joint, percutaneous, with image guidance, includes placement of intra-articular implant(s) (e.g., bone allograft(s), synthetic device(s)) (Termed) |
| 27279 | Arthrodesis, sacroiliac joint, percutaneous or minimally invasive (indirect visualization), with image guidance, includes obtaining bone graft when performed |
| 27280 | Arthrodesis, open, sacroiliac joint, including obtaining bone graft, including instrumentation, when performed |
| No codes listed |
| M46.1 | Sacroiliitis, not elsewhere classified |
| M47.898 | Other spondylosis, sacral and sacrococcygeal region |
| M47.899 | Other spondylosis, site unspecified |
| M48.08 | Spinal stenosis, sacral and sacrococcygeal region |
| M53.2X8 | Spinal instabilities, sacral and sacrococcygeal region |
| M53.3 | Sacrococcygeal disorders, not elsewhere classified |
| M54.18 | Radiculopathy, sacral and sacrococcygeal region |
| L36406 | CMS LCD - Minimally-invasive Surgical (MIS) Fusion of the Sacroiliac (SI) Joint |
Provider Actions & Prior Authorization
Prior authorization required when all criteria met
Prior authorization is required for minimally invasive SIJ fusion when the member meets ALL medical appropriateness criteria, including procedure performed for lumbopelvic pain originating from the SIJ, use of structural devices that traverse/transfix the SIJ, diagnostic confirmation with two separate contrast-enhanced fluoroscopic or CT-guided intra-articular SIJ blocks showing ≥75% pain reduction, and prior conservative non-surgical treatment including at least one therapeutic intra-articular SIJ injection unless contraindicated.
- Procedure indication must be lumbopelvic pain originating from the SIJ
- Two separate contrast-enhanced fluoroscopic or CT-guided intra-articular SIJ blocks showing ≥75% pain reduction
- At least one therapeutic intra-articular SIJ injection as part of conservative care
Provide documentation of conservative care, imaging, and eligibility
Prior authorization requests must include documentation that all conservative treatment, diagnostic imaging, and eligibility criteria were met prior to approval for minimally invasive SIJ fusion.
- Detailed record of at least six months of non-invasive treatments (NSAIDs, medication optimization, activity modification, physician-supervised active PT/home exercise)
- Record of therapeutic intra-articular SIJ injection trial
Prior authorization required for open SIJ fusion with full criteria
Open SIJ fusion requires prior authorization and is medically appropriate only when ALL listed criteria are met, including corroborating imaging, documented nicotine-free status, and at least one specified indication (e.g., post‑traumatic SIJ injury, adjunct for infection, sacral tumor management, part of multi‑segmental long fusion, or failed prior percutaneous SIJ fusion).
- Plain X‑rays or CT/MRI showing localized SIJ pathology concordant with history/physical
- Nicotine-free status documented (never-smoker OR ≥6 weeks abstinent with cotinine testing)
- At least one listed indication (post‑traumatic injury, infection adjunct, tumor management, multi‑segmental fusion, or failed prior percutaneous SIJ fusion)
Include CPT/ICD-10, levels, and detailed prior nonsurgical care
Spinal surgery prior authorization must include CPT and ICD-10 codes with levels/motion segments and comprehensive documentation of prior provider‑directed nonsurgical care and responses.
- CPT, ICD‑10, and disc levels/motion segments for planned surgery
- Detailed type, duration, frequency, and response to nonsurgical treatments; explanation if treatments were contraindicated
- Documentation of less than clinically meaningful improvement for each treatment
Authorization requires failed conservative care, positive exams, and injection response
Prior authorization must document ≥6 months of failed conservative care, a positive cluster of at least three provocative SIJ tests, and diagnostic confirmation with ≥75% pain relief on two image‑guided intra‑articular SIJ injections.
- Minimum six months of intensive nonoperative treatment
- At least three positive provocative SIJ maneuvers
- Two separate image‑guided intra‑articular SIJ injections with ≥75% pain reduction documented
Prior authorization tied to listed CPT codes and device context
Prior authorization is required for the CPT codes listed for SIJ arthrodesis/fusion procedures; the policy also references FDA‑cleared SIJ implants when considering device applicability.
Follow product coverage rules and applicable CMS LCD
Follow Univera product rules and any applicable CMS LCD (L36406) guidance when requesting prior authorization; medical policy criteria apply only when the member's product covers the service.
- If the member's product does not cover the service, policy criteria do not apply and services may be denied
- When covered by product, follow product‑specific coverage lines (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare/DSNP) and referenced LCD
Require prior conservative non-surgical treatment and injection trial
A prior conservative, non‑surgical treatment trial is required, including at least one therapeutic intra‑articular SIJ injection unless contraindicated.
- Document reason if injection is contraindicated
Require stepwise conservative care including ≥6 months and injection
Stepwise conservative care must include at least one intra‑articular SIJ injection and a minimum of six consecutive months of non‑invasive therapy before surgical consideration.
- Therapies include NSAIDs, prescription medication optimization, activity modification, and physician‑supervised active physical therapy/home exercise program
Open fusion may follow failed percutaneous SIJ fusion
Open SIJ fusion may be appropriate when a prior percutaneous (minimally invasive) SIJ fusion has failed, supporting a stepwise progression from percutaneous to open fusion in select cases.
- Failure of prior percutaneous SIJ fusion must be documented
Document nicotine‑free status with cotinine testing
Medical record must document nicotine‑free status: either never‑smoker or abstinence from tobacco/nicotine for at least six weeks prior to planned surgery validated by objective cotinine testing (serum, urine, or saliva) within normal range.
- Record type of cotinine test and result (serum, urinary, or saliva) showing abstinence
Provide required plain X‑rays and cross‑sectional imaging
Include diagnostic imaging reports: plain X‑rays (including ipsilateral hip) and cross‑sectional imaging (CT or MRI) that exclude destructive lesions, acute fracture/instability, and evaluate the lumbar spine to exclude alternative pain sources.
- AP pelvis radiograph to evaluate hip pathology
- SIJ CT or MRI to exclude tumor, infection, or autoimmune arthropathy
- Lumbar spine CT or MRI to rule out neural compression or other degenerative conditions
Document conservative treatment history including ≥6 months and injection
Document conservative non‑surgical treatment including at least one therapeutic intra‑articular SIJ injection and at least six consecutive months of non‑invasive treatments (NSAIDs, medication optimization, activity modification, physician‑supervised active PT/home exercise).
- List dates, duration, frequency, and objective response for each conservative therapy
- Include description of supervised/prescribed physical therapy program
Document exclusion of alternative diagnoses (systemic inflammatory arthropathy, hip/lumbar causes)
Provide diagnostic testing to exclude systemic inflammatory arthropathy and documentation demonstrating absence of alternative diagnoses more likely to explain the individual's pain or disability.
- Include relevant lab or imaging studies used to exclude inflammatory arthropathy
- Document rationale excluding alternative diagnoses
Include imaging concordant with exam and nicotine‑free proof for open SIJ fusion
For open SIJ fusion prerequisites, documentation must include imaging demonstrating localized SIJ pathology concordant with history/physical and nicotine‑free status validated by cotinine testing as specified for surgery.
- Imaging concordant with history/physical
- Nicotine abstinence documented with objective cotinine testing
Submit minimum documentation list for prior authorization
Minimum prior authorization documentation for spinal surgery must include CPT and ICD‑10 codes with levels/motion segments, detailed documentation of type/duration/frequency of prior nonsurgical treatments and responses, and explanations if non‑surgical treatment was contraindicated.
- CPT/ICD‑10 codes and planned levels/motion segments
- Detailed nonsurgical treatment history and documented responses
Document behavioral health status and repeat‑procedure timing
Document behavioral health status and provide timing information for repeat procedures where relevant; address absence of unmanaged significant mental or behavioral health disorders.
- If repeat procedure requested, include time frame and rationale
Confirm product coverage before applying policy criteria
Apply the policy criteria only when the member's product covers the service; if the product does not cover the service, requests may be denied and the policy criteria do not apply.
- Verify product coverage (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare/DSNP) before applying policy criteria
Denial likely without SIJ indication, diagnostic blocks, or positive provocative tests
Denial is likely if the procedure is not performed for lumbopelvic pain originating from the SIJ, if diagnostic confirmation via two separate contrast‑enhanced intra‑articular SIJ blocks does not show ≥75% pain reduction, or if fewer than three provocative SIJ maneuvers elicit typical pain.
- Lack of ≥75% pain reduction on two diagnostic blocks
- Fewer than three positive provocative SIJ maneuvers
- Procedure performed for non‑SIJ lumbopelvic pain
Failure to meet all policy criteria may result in denial
Any case that fails to meet ALL Policy Statement I criteria will be considered not medically appropriate and may be denied.
- Ensure every listed Policy Statement I requirement is documented to avoid denial
Technical or ineligible procedure scenarios risk denial
Procedures in which implant insertion is prevented or bilateral procedures performed on the same date of service are considered not medically appropriate and may be denied.
- Document if implant insertion was not possible and provide rationale
- Bilateral same‑day procedures with titanium triangular implants are excluded
Bilateral same‑day percutaneous SIJ fusion is not appropriate
Minimally invasive/percutaneous SIJ fusion using titanium triangular implants for bilateral procedures on the same date of service is considered not medically appropriate.
- Do not request coverage for bilateral same‑day percutaneous SIJ fusion using titanium triangular implants
Procedures without intent to fuse are not medically necessary
Minimally invasive SIJ fusion or stabilization performed without the intention of fusing the SI joint (joint distraction/non‑fusion) is considered not medically necessary and may be denied.
- Ensure the procedure intent to fuse is explicit in operative documentation
Open SIJ fusion lacking full criteria may be denied
Open SIJ fusion performed without meeting ALL specified open SIJ fusion criteria is considered not medically appropriate and may be denied.
- Document all open SIJ fusion criteria (imaging concordant with exam, nicotine‑free status, and at least one qualifying indication)
Open SIJ fusion investigational indications — denial risk
Open SIJ fusion is considered investigational for mechanical low back pain, sacroiliac joint syndrome, degenerative sacroiliac joint, and radicular pain syndrome; requests for these indications may be denied.
- Do not submit open SIJ fusion requests for the listed investigational indications without documented exceptional justification
Denial triggers: inadequate diagnostic confirmation or insufficient conservative therapy
Lack of required diagnostic confirmation (supportive symptoms, exam findings, imaging excluding other causes, and positive diagnostic injections) or insufficient conservative treatment history may trigger denial.
- Ensure documentation of supportive symptoms, Fortin's point tenderness, and three or more positive provocative tests
- Include pain diary evidence and conservative care timeline
Denial risk if required imaging is missing
Absence of required diagnostic imaging (pelvis AP radiograph, SIJ radiographs plus CT or MRI excluding destructive lesions or autoimmune arthropathy, and lumbar spine CT/MRI to rule out alternate sources) may trigger denial.
- Attach AP pelvis, SIJ CT/MRI, and lumbar spine CT/MRI reports as applicable
Denial risk for missing diagnostic/clinical prerequisites
Absence of at least 75% pain reduction on two separate image‑guided diagnostic intra‑articular SIJ injections, absence of a trial therapeutic intra‑articular SIJ injection, or presence of generalized pain disorders (e.g., fibromyalgia) could lead to noncoverage or denial.
- Two diagnostic injections with documented ≥75% pain reduction are required
- Document therapeutic injection trial and responses
- Document absence of generalized pain disorders
Verify member product coverage to avoid denial
Services may be denied if the member's product does not cover the service; verify product coverage before submitting prior authorization.
- Confirm product coverage (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare/DSNP) prior to submission
Background
Minimally invasive SIJ fusion/stabilization is intended to treat lumbopelvic pain originating from the sacroiliac joint by implanting structural devices that traverse and transfix the joint to achieve fusion. Proper candidate selection requires localization of pain to the posterior SIJ (e.g., Fortin's point), positive provocative maneuvers, diagnostic intra‑articular blocks, and failure of conservative therapies.
Definitions
Revision History
Annual review updated provocative physical examination maneuver criteria for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion and expanded cotinine testing methods for nicotine-free status; policy title changed to 'Sacroiliac Joint Fusion or Stabilization' and a new not medically necessary statement was added for minimally invasive procedures.
Summary-of-changes tracking was implemented.
Original policy effective date and initial committee approval.
Summary‑of‑changes: the policy underwent annual review on 06/18/26. Material changes include addition of new criteria for provocative physical examination maneuvers and expansion of cotinine testing methods for confirming nicotine‑free status; the policy title was changed to 'Sacroiliac Joint Fusion or Stabilization' and a new not medically necessary statement for minimally invasive procedures was added.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.