Phototherapy and Photochemotherapy (PUVA) for Skin Conditions
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0205 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0205 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines Aetna's medical necessity, experimental/investigational, limitations, and coding guidance for PUVA, UVA, narrow-band UVB, home phototherapy, and Goeckerman regimens for various dermatologic conditions and patient groups.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria
PUVA — Medically Necessary Indications
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Conditions listed include alopecia areata; chronic palmoplantar pustulosis; cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (mycosis fungoides); cutaneous graft versus host disease; eosinophilic folliculitis/HIV pruritic eruptions; granuloma annulare; Grover's disease; lymphomatoid papulosis; morphea/localized scleroderma; necrobiosis lipoidica; photodermatoses; pityriasis lichenoides; polymorphous light eruption; severe lichen planus; severe parapsoriasis; severe refractory atopic dermatitis/eczema; severe refractory pruritus of polycythemia vera; severe urticaria pigmentosa (cutaneous mastocytosis); severely disabling psoriasis (>=10% BSA or severe hands/feet/scalp); vitiligo.
UVA Phototherapy — Medically Necessary Indications
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Narrow-band UVB — Medically Necessary Indications
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
NB-UVB often preferred for many non-psoriatic conditions due to efficacy and favorable safety profile.
Goeckerman regimen (UVB + topical coal tar)
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Policy specifies CPT 96910 for Goeckerman when selection criteria are met.
Home phototherapy (UVB) — Covered Indications
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Home PUVA is not covered; tanning beds for home phototherapy are considered not medically necessary; replacement bulbs and home UVB panels are covered when selection criteria are met.
Phototherapy coverage and sequencing
Phototherapy/PUVA coverage considerations and preferred sequencing
UpToDate recommendations and policy background.
Narrowband UVB is often preferred due to ease of administration.
Policy notes and background evidence.
Evidence summaries by condition
Condition-specific evidence summaries (informational for coverage decisions)
Duarte et al (2010); Kim et al (2012).
Gambichler et al (2005) and related reviews.
Policy background and literature summaries.
Therapeutic sequencing for localized scleroderma (morphea)
Treatment approach described in the evidence summary:
Phototherapy (UVA‑1 or NB‑UVB) is appropriate for adolescents with superficial circumscribed subtypes.
Weibel (2012) evidence summary.
Photodermatoses (prophylaxis and treatment)
Phototherapy options and when they are used in photodermatoses:
Collins & Ferguson; Dummer et al.; Fesq et al.
Fesq et al. (2003) guidance.
Chronic actinic dermatitis and chronic urticaria
Evidence and recommendations for management:
Khaled et al.; UpToDate summary.
Khafagy et al. (2013); Bishnoi et al. (2017).
Other rare conditions (Wells syndrome, necrobiotic xanthogranuloma, scleredema, mastocytosis, alopecia mucinosa)
Phototherapy and photochemotherapy have been used with variable evidence:
Raßler et al. (2016).
Miguel et al. (2017).
UpToDate (Kreuter, 2017); Kalfa et al.
Brazzelli et al. (2012, 2016).
Case reports and reviews.
Covered indications with criteria and evidence caveats
Covered when supported by clinical context and prior therapy failures:
Small retrospective series show symptomatic benefit but long‑term recurrence and increased skin cancer risk with prolonged PUVA.
Evidence includes single RCTs and observational studies with mixed results.
NCCN guidance and background literature.
Insufficient high‑quality evidence; use guided by clinical context.
Cutaneous mastocytosis (NB-UVB or PUVA)
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Small retrospective series (Brazzelli et al) showed pruritus reduction with both NB‑UVB and PUVA; long‑term recurrence common and long‑term PUVA associated with increased skin cancer risk.
Mycosis fungoides (early-stage)
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Retrospective studies report complete response rates 54–90%; home phototherapy has historical support in select early MF patients but is less commonly recommended.
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP)
Covered when ANY of the following sequences apply:
NCCN and UpToDate guidance support methotrexate first‑line for extensive/symptomatic disease with PUVA or NB‑UVB as alternatives.
Pityriasis lichenoides (PL)
Coverage consideration:
Systematic review suggests NB‑UVB as first‑line phototherapy with reported clearance rates ~70–100% across studies but evidence quality is limited and heterogeneous.
NB-UVB for investigational indications (e.g., COVID-19)
Investigational/experimental:
Lau et al (2022) pilot RCT — preliminary, underpowered results.
Phototherapy selection for pityriasis lichenoides
Contextual coverage considerations derived from evidence and guideline statements:
Systematic review and UpToDate guidance recommend NB‑UVB preference based on safety evidence and comparable efficacy.
Hypersensitive drug eruption (case report)
Individual-case evidence noted for hypersensitivity drug eruption
Single‑case reports are low‑level evidence and should be interpreted cautiously.
PUVA, UVA and narrow-band UVB are designated experimental or investigational for a wide range of indications that are not included in the policy's lists of medically necessary conditions. The source policy explicitly lists multiple examples for each modality (e.g., PUVA for acne, melasma, necrobiosis lipoidica; UVA for infectious keratitis and uremic pruritus; NB-UVB for COVID-19, Hailey-Hailey disease, hidradenitis suppurativa, lichen sclerosus, and many other diagnoses), and states that these uses are considered investigational because effectiveness has not been established.
PUVA therapy has defined contraindications. The policy lists a history of arsenic exposure, a history of prior ionizing radiation exposure, a history or presence of melanoma or other skin cancer, and pregnancy as conditions in which PUVA is contraindicated. Guideline and evidence summaries further note additional absolute contraindications and populations in which PUVA safety is not established (e.g., photosensitivity disorders such as lupus or porphyria, xeroderma pigmentosum, nursing mothers, and children).
Although small case reports have described benefit from NB-UVB in individual patients with Hailey‑Hailey disease, the policy notes that an UpToDate review on Hailey‑Hailey disease does not list phototherapy or NB‑UVB as a therapeutic option, indicating phototherapy is not an established or guideline‑recognized treatment for this condition.
The policy emphasizes that long‑term use of PUVA is associated with an increased risk of skin cancer. Reviews cited in the document indicate phototherapy may provide temporary symptomatic relief (for example in cutaneous mastocytosis) but lesions commonly recur after therapy is stopped, and persistent or maintenance PUVA raises cancer risk concerns that affect appropriateness of long‑term use.
The document summarizes absolute contraindications for ultraviolet phototherapy modalities, including known photosensitivity disorders (for example, lupus erythematosus, porphyria, xeroderma pigmentosum), history of melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer, prior arsenic or ionizing radiation exposure, and notes that PUVA safety is not established in pregnancy, nursing mothers, or children.
Some background and evidence sections included in the policy do not state explicit exclusions for certain single conditions; rather, the document highlights limitations in the evidence base (low-quality studies, case series, heterogeneous follow‑up) that may limit supported indications even when explicit exclusion language is not present.
Home PUVA is specifically not covered due to insufficient evidence of safety. The policy also states that the use of tanning beds for home UVB phototherapy is not medically necessary and would be denied; by contrast, appropriately prescribed home UVB devices (HCPCS E0691–E0694, A4633) are treated separately in the policy when criteria for home UVB are met.
Application of emollients (e.g., petrolatum) prior to UVB exposure has been used in practice based on theoretical increases in UV transmission, but the policy notes there are no randomized controlled trials demonstrating clinical benefit from routine pre‑UVB emollient application.
A systematic review of treatments for uremic pruritus included many interventions and found that, aside from gabapentin, the overall evidence was weak. The policy highlights that evidence supporting phototherapy for uremic pruritus and numerous other conditions is limited or low quality, which affects coverage decisions.
The policy documents that NB‑UVB is not mentioned or supported as a therapeutic option for several conditions in authoritative reviews (for example, some drug‑related hypersensitivity reactions, lichen sclerosus, and certain lichenoid dermatoses), indicating lack of endorsement by those sources and limited evidence to support routine NB‑UVB use for those diagnoses.
Case reports and isolated single‑patient experiences (for example, a single case of a drug‑related psoriasiform eruption responding to NB‑UVB) are acknowledged in the policy but are considered low‑level evidence; routine use of NB‑UVB for such rare, single‑case scenarios is generally not medically necessary without additional supporting data.
Provider Actions and Authorization Guidance
Prior Authorization Required
Prior authorization is required for phototherapy services and for home phototherapy equipment (UVB panels/booths and replacement bulbs) when covered. Document the diagnosis, prior therapies tried, and clinical rationale that conventional therapies failed or were inappropriate. For home UVB DME, include a prescription specifying device model, treatment area, and medical necessity (e.g., severe psoriasis with frequent flares and inability to attend on-site therapy; atopic dermatitis unable to attend on-site therapy).
- Prior authorization required for selected CPT/HCPCS when selection criteria are met
- Home UVB devices (E0691–E0694; A4633) covered only if criteria met and PA obtained
Authorization Requirements for PUVA
PUVA (psoralens + UVA) has specific authorization requirements: confirm that conventional (topical/systemic) therapies have failed or are unsuitable, and that no absolute contraindications to PUVA are present. Document that benefits are expected to outweigh risks for the requested indication and setting (office-administered is preferred for safety).
- PUVA generally considered medically necessary only after conventional therapies have failed
- Home PUVA is considered investigational/unsupported and is not covered
Document Topical Preparations and Skin Protection
Document all concomitant topical preparations and skin protection measures. Note use of emollients (e.g., petrolatum) or other agents applied before phototherapy, and whether sunscreens or salicylic acid preparations that may block UV penetration are avoided on treatment areas. Describe any intentional UV-blocking applied to uninvolved skin.
- List topical agents applied prior to each treatment (emollients, keratolytics, sunscreens)
- Indicate sites protected with physical/or topical UV blockers (e.g., zinc oxide)
Prior Therapy and Symptom Metrics
For indications with symptom-driven endpoints (e.g., mastocytosis/indolent systemic mastocytosis with pruritus), document prior therapies tried, objective and patient-reported symptom metrics (e.g., pruritus VAS), number of prior treatment failures, and reason for escalation to phototherapy.
- Record prior antihistamine trials and other systemic/topical agents for mastocytosis
- Provide pruritus severity using VAS or similar and document baseline and prior responses
Indications, Contraindications, and Treatment Setting
Authorization must explicitly state the indication, relevant contraindications have been assessed and excluded, and the treatment setting (office vs home). For example, confirm indication such as early-stage mycosis fungoides, severe refractory atopic dermatitis, or refractory mastocytosis, and that home therapy is requested only for allowed diagnoses (severe psoriasis, selected atopic dermatitis).
- Confirm indication (e.g., early-stage mycosis fungoides vs extensive CTCL)
- State planned setting: office-based phototherapy preferred; home UVB only when criteria met
Denied Equipment / Approaches
Certain equipment and approaches are considered not medically necessary or not covered. Tanning beds for home phototherapy and home PUVA are not covered.
- Tanning beds for home UVB phototherapy — not medically necessary
- Home PUVA — insufficient evidence; not covered
Contraindications That May Trigger Denial
Several contraindications should trigger denial or require clear documentation that they are absent prior to authorization for PUVA or UV phototherapy. Explicitly document absence of history of arsenic exposure, prior ionizing radiation to the treatment site, history or presence of melanoma or other skin cancer, pregnancy, photosensitivity disorders, and relevant photosensitizing medications.
- History of arsenic exposure — contraindication
- History of ionizing radiation exposure or radiodermatitis — contraindication
- History or presence of melanoma or nonmelanoma skin cancer — contraindication
- Pregnancy — contraindication
- Photosensitivity disorders (e.g., xeroderma pigmentosum, porphyria) — contraindication
- Concomitant photosensitizing drugs or significant hepatic impairment should be documented
Histological Confirmation Important to Avoid Misdiagnosis
For conditions where radiation-induced morphea (RIM) is in the differential, histological confirmation is crucial. Failure to obtain or document biopsy/histology distinguishing RIM from recurrence, chronic radiation dermatitis, or other mimics may lead to misdiagnosis and impact coverage decisions.
- Obtain histologic confirmation when radiation-induced morphea is suspected
- Document multidisciplinary evaluation when diagnosis is uncertain
Weak Evidence May Risk Denial
Weak or low-quality evidence for some indications may increase risk of denial. Provide strong clinical rationale, citation of guideline recommendations, or higher-quality supporting literature when requesting phototherapy for less well-established indications.
- Indications supported only by case series or single reports require supportive literature or guideline backing
- Document why alternative treatments are unsuitable or have failed
Contraindications That May Preclude Coverage
Certain absolute or relative contraindications may preclude coverage. If present, document clinical rationale for any exception and consult medical policy medical director if applicable.
- Absolute contraindications (e.g., xeroderma pigmentosum, lupus erythematosus) — generally preclude therapy
- Relative contraindications (e.g., prior arsenic or ionizing radiation, transplant immunosuppression) — may preclude coverage depending on risk assessment
Evidence Insufficiency Risk
Insufficient or low-quality evidence (single-case reports, small uncontrolled series) used as the sole justification for coverage may lead to denial. When evidence is limited, include clinical course, objective measures, and prior treatment failures to strengthen the request.
- Cite higher-quality studies or guideline recommendations when available
- Provide objective outcome measures (e.g., VAS scores, cumulative exposures) if relying on limited evidence
Monitoring and Device Documentation
Monitoring requirements and device documentation: for home phototherapy patients, document a dermatology follow-up and regular skin examinations. For DME home UVB devices, include prescription details, device specifications, training provided, and a monitoring plan (frequency of follow-up visits, skin checks). Replacement bulbs may require prescription and PA documentation.
- Regular dermatologic skin exams required for home phototherapy patients
- Device prescription should include model, panel size, intended treatment area, and recommended dosing schedule
- Replacement bulbs (A4633) require documentation of medical necessity and prescription
Monitoring and Patient Education
Patient education and oversight: document that patients receiving home phototherapy were instructed on device use, eye protection, identification of suspicious lesions, avoidance of tanning salons, and the need to stop therapy and seek evaluation if new or changing lesions appear.
- Provide written patient education on device operation and safety
- Document training on eye protection, dosing, and signs of skin cancer or severe reactions
- Advise against use of tanning salons and unsupervised PUVA
Suggested Clinical Documentation Elements
Suggested clinical documentation elements to include in authorization requests: baseline disease severity/extent, number of prior exposures/treatments, cumulative UV dose if previously treated, pruritus or symptom VAS scores, serum markers if relevant (e.g., tryptase in mastocytosis), and histology reports when applicable.
- Number of prior phototherapy exposures and cumulative J/cm2 when available
- Baseline and serial pruritus VAS or other symptom scales
- Relevant labs (e.g., serum tryptase) and histology or biopsy reports
Required Clinical Documentation
Required clinical documentation for authorization: primary diagnosis (ICD-10), prior therapies and duration, reason for discontinuation or failure, extent of disease (BSA% or descriptive), planned phototherapy modality and regimen, contraindications assessed and ruled out, and supporting literature or guideline citations when applicable.
- Primary ICD-10 diagnosis and clinical staging where applicable (e.g., early-stage MF)
- Detail prior topical/systemic therapies, durations, and responses
- Planned treatment frequency, duration, and setting (office vs home)
Supportive Clinical References
When clinical evidence is mixed, include supportive clinical references or guideline preference to justify modality choice (e.g., NB-UVB often preferred over PUVA for safety and ease of administration; cite AAD, UpToDate, or consensus guidelines for MF, mastocytosis, pityriasis lichenoides).
- Cite guideline recommendations (AAD, U.S. Cutaneous Lymphoma Consortium) when available
- If selecting PUVA over NB-UVB, document rationale and supporting evidence
Therapy Sequencing Considerations
Therapy sequencing considerations: phototherapy is typically positioned after failure of first-line topical and/or systemic therapies. For certain conditions there are preferred sequences (e.g., topical corticosteroids before PUVA/NB-UVB; NB-UVB often preferred as first-line phototherapy due to safety profile). Document prior steps and rationale for sequencing chosen.
- Document that topical corticosteroids or other first-line treatments were attempted when standard of care
- If requesting PUVA as second-line, explain why NB-UVB was not appropriate or available
Suggested Treatment Sequencing
Suggested treatment sequencing examples: NB-UVB is often first-line for pityriasis lichenoides and many non-psoriatic conditions; methotrexate or oral erythromycin may be used as second-line where indicated. For localized scleroderma (morphea), systemic corticosteroids plus methotrexate are often first-line for progressive disease; phototherapy is appropriate for superficial circumscribed subtypes or adolescents.
- NB-UVB preferred for pityriasis lichenoides; consider oral erythromycin or methotrexate as alternatives
- For morphea: systemic steroids + methotrexate for progressive localized disease; phototherapy for superficial subtypes
Administrative Notes / None Specified
No additional provider actions specified in these source chunks beyond the above; administrative policy history and notices are present in the policy footer. Providers remain responsible for treatment decisions and should follow documentation and prior authorization processes.
- Clinical Policy Bulletins are administrative tools and do not replace clinical judgment
- Follow PA and documentation requirements outlined above
Coding and Billing
| 96912 | Photochemotherapy; psoralens and ultraviolet A (PUVA) |
| 96913 | Photochemotherapy (Goeckerman and/or PUVA) for severe photoresponsive dermatoses requiring at least 4-8 hours of care under direct supervision of the physician (includes applications of medication and dressings) |
| 96900 | Actinotherapy (ultraviolet light) [Narrow-band UVB] |
| 96910 | Photochemotherapy; tar and ultraviolet B (Goeckerman treatment) or petrolatum and ultraviolet B |
| A4633 | Replacement bulb/lamp for ultraviolet light therapy system, each |
| E0691 | Ultraviolet light therapy system panel, includes bulbs/lamps, timer and eye protection; treatment area 2 sq feet or less |
| E0692 | Ultraviolet light therapy system panel, includes bulbs/lamps, timer and eye protection; 4 ft panel |
| E0693 | Ultraviolet light therapy system panel, includes bulbs/lamps, timer and eye protection; 6 ft panel |
| E0694 | Ultraviolet multidirectional light therapy system in 6 ft cabinet, includes bulbs/lamps, timer and eye protection |
| B20 | Human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] disease |
| C84.00 - C84.09 | Mycosis fungoides and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma |
| C84.A0 - C84.A9 | Mycosis fungoides and cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (alternate range listings present) |
| L20.0 - L20.82, L20.84 - L20.9 | Atopic dermatitis [severe refractory] |
| L40.0 - L40.9 | Psoriasis [severe disabling, involving 10% or more of body or severe psoriasis involving the hands, feet or scalp] |
| L80 | Vitiligo |
| L63.0 - L63.9 | Alopecia areata |
| C43.0 - C43.9 | Malignant melanoma of skin (contraindicated) |
| C44.00 - C44.99 | Other and unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin (contraindicated) |
| Z34.00 - Z34.93 | Encounter for supervision of normal pregnancy (contraindicated) |
Background and Definitions
Background: Phototherapy modalities described in the policy include PUVA (psoralen plus UVA), UVA and narrow‑band UVB (NB‑UVB)
Revision History
Policy last reviewed on 01/24/2024 (document lists Last Review date).
Policy effective date set as 03/12/1998 (original effective date for the policy).
Next review was scheduled for 02/08/2024 per policy header.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.