Repeat Procedure by Different Provider
Indicates a procedure was legitimately repeated by a different physician or qualified provider, explaining to payers that the second claim is not a duplicate.
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for cpt_modifier 77 policy alerts
Get alerted when payer policies referencing 77 are released or updated.
Monitor payer policy activity
Modifier 77 indicates that a previously performed procedure or service was legitimately repeated by a different physician or other qualified health care professional. The AMA’s CPT definition specifies it is appended when the repeat is performed by another provider, and professional sources (AAPC, coding resources) emphasize that Modifier 77 is used when the repeating provider is different from the original. It is distinct from Modifier 76, which denotes a repeat by the same provider, and should not be used on E/M codes. Payers commonly require supporting documentation; without the modifier a repeat procedure may be treated as a duplicate and denied, and the modifier is not intended to override NCCI edits. Sources: AMA CPT guidance, AAPC, codingAhead, CMS guidance, payer policies (Amerigroup, Molina).
Reimbursement effects vary by payer. Some plans (for example, Amerigroup Medicare Advantage) reimburse nonsurgical repeated procedures at 100% of the fee schedule or contracted rate and may reimburse the surgical component at 100% for up to two repeated surgeries, provided documentation justifies the repeat. Payers generally expect clinical documentation that explains why a different provider performed the repeat and may deny claims that lack sufficient justification, or when the modifier is used in disallowed situations (e.g., appended to E/M codes, repeated more than once, or applied to pre/postoperative components). Modifier 77 does not nullify NCCI editing and is not a mechanism to bypass coding edits.