Find policies, billing codes, payers, states, and providers
Facet Joint Injections/ Medial Branch Blocks
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for univerahealthcare Policy 7.01.116 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 7.01.116 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Criteria for when diagnostic and therapeutic facet joint injections and medial branch nerve blocks are considered medically appropriate for cervical, thoracic, and lumbar axial pain, and use as an alternative when radiofrequency ablation is contraindicated. Applies to Univera Healthcare coverage determinations and providers requesting authorization.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria
Initial Diagnostic Facet Joint Injection/Medial Branch Nerve Block
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Second Diagnostic Facet Joint Injection/Medial Branch Nerve Block
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Therapeutic Facet Joint/Medial Branch Block as Alternative to Radiofrequency Ablation
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Initial therapeutic facet joint injections/medial branch blocks as alternative to radiofrequency ablation
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Subsequent therapeutic facet joint injections/medial branch nerve blocks as alternative to radiofrequency ablation
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Facet joint injection with synovial cyst aspiration
Initial injection with synovial cyst aspiration is considered medically appropriate when BOTH criteria are met
Not Medically Necessary
Performance is considered not medically necessary for ANY of the following:
Exception: allowed if performed at a spinal level contiguous with a posteriorly fused spinal motion segment
Investigational
Facet joint injection/medial branch nerve block is considered investigational for ANY of the following:
Policy applies only to injections of anesthetic, corticosteroid, and/or contrast
Diagnostic/prognostic block criteria
Covered when criteria for diagnostic/prognostic blocks are met
Guideline references also note >50% is commonly used as threshold for prognostic blocks prior to RFA; conservative therapy trial recommended prior to interventions.
Conservative therapy requirement (guideline-based recommendation)
Guideline-recommended conservative care before interventions
Guideline (Cohen 2020) recommendation; may inform coverage determinations.
Other causes of axial pain must be excluded before attributing symptoms to the facet joints. Examples listed in the policy include central spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication or myelopathy, foraminal stenosis or disc herniation with concordant radicular pain/radiculopathy that has been treated, and structural or pathologic processes such as infection, tumor, fracture, pseudoarthrosis, or pain related to spinal instrumentation. Clinical findings and imaging studies should support the exclusion of these alternative causes prior to performing diagnostic facet joint injections or medial branch nerve blocks.
Facet joint injections and medial branch nerve blocks must be performed with imaging guidance; the policy specifies that procedures performed without the use of fluoroscopic or CT guidance are considered not medically necessary. Although CPT entries exist for ultrasound-guided injections, the policy treats ultrasound guidance as investigational for these procedures and requires fluoroscopy or CT for medically necessary performance.
Facet joint injections or medial branch nerve blocks are not allowed on the same day as another invasive procedure except in a specific, limited circumstance: a facet joint injection performed together with a transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI) when the facet injection is being done to perform a synovial cyst aspiration. For synovial cyst aspiration procedures the policy requires appropriate advanced imaging confirmation (MRI, CT, or CT myelogram) and clinical correlation with radicular signs and symptoms.
The policy limits treatment to a maximum of three contiguous spinal levels per session. Procedures performed on >3 contiguous levels are considered not medically necessary, with a single exception: injections contiguous with a posteriorly fused spinal motion segment may be allowed when clinically indicated and documented.
This policy applies only to injections consisting of an anesthetic, corticosteroid, and/or contrast agent and only when performed for suspected facet-mediated pain. The anatomical scope of the policy covers facet joint–mediated axial pain (levels cited elsewhere in the policy) and does not extend to other injectates or indications outside facet-mediated pain.
Certain articulations are not considered facet joints for the purposes of this policy. The policy explicitly excludes the occiput–atlas (C0–C1) and atlas–axis (C1–C2) articulations and states that levels below L5–S1 (sacrum) are not facet joint levels covered under this policy.
Additional diagnostic injections at a level previously treated successfully with radiofrequency denervation/ablation are considered not medically necessary. The policy requires that a second diagnostic injection be performed only when it would affect the decision to proceed to radiofrequency denervation; thus repeat diagnostic injections after a prior successful RFA at the requested level are generally excluded.
See the Not Medically Necessary section for multiple specific scenarios that preclude coverage. Examples include procedures performed on more than three contiguous levels (with limited exception for levels contiguous to a posterior fusion), additional diagnostic injections after a successful radiofrequency denervation at the requested level, injections above C2–C3 or below L5–S1, therapeutic injections performed after the initial two diagnostic injections except when radiofrequency ablation is contraindicated, and requests that schedule a series of injections without prior evaluation of response to earlier procedures.
Clinical guidance cited in the policy recommends against the routine use of therapeutic medial branch blocks (MBB) and intraarticular (IA) injections. While there are contexts in which therapeutic injections may be appropriate (for example when RFA is contraindicated or when prognostic blocks provide prolonged relief), routine therapeutic use without specific justification is not supported by the guideline statements referenced in the policy.
Coding
| 0213T | Injection(s), diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet (zygapophyseal) joint (or nerves innervating that joint) with ultrasound guidance; single level |
| 0214T | second level (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| 0215T | third and any additional level(s) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| 0216T | Injection(s), diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet (zygapophyseal) joint (or nerves innervating that joint) with ultrasound guidance, lumbar or sacral; single level |
| 0217T | second level (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| 0218T | third and any additional level(s) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| 64490 | Injection(s), diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet (zygapophyseal) joint (or nerves innervating that joint) with image guidance (fluoroscopy or CT), cervical or thoracic; single level |
| 64491 | second level (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| 64492 | third and any additional level(s) (List separately in addition to code for primary procedure) |
| 64493 | Injection(s), diagnostic or therapeutic agent, paravertebral facet (zygapophyseal) joint (or nerves innervating that joint) with image guidance (fluoroscopy or CT), lumbar or sacral; single level |
| No codes listed |
| Multiple | Multiple ICD-10 codes referenced; specific ICD-10 codes not enumerated in this section |
Provider Actions and Documentation Requirements
Prior authorization required for initial and second diagnostic blocks
Initial and second diagnostic facet joint injections/medial branch nerve blocks submitted for authorization must include documentation that all coverage criteria are met (see clinical criteria for initial and second diagnostic blocks).
- Initial diagnostic block: documentation that pain is predominantly axial (C2-3 to L5-S1), duration ≥3 months, and ≥4 weeks of conservative care in prior 3 months or documented contraindication
- Second diagnostic block: administered at same level(s) as initial block and intended to confirm validity of the initial positive response
Prior authorization when therapeutic injection used instead of RFA
When therapeutic facet joint/medial branch injections are proposed as an alternative to radiofrequency ablation, prior authorization must document that the individual is not a candidate for RFA (specific contraindications) and that criteria for therapeutic alternative are met.
- Document a contraindication to RFA such as established spinal pseudoarthrosis at the intended level or presence of an implanted electrical device (e.g., pacemaker, defibrillator, dorsal column stimulator, DRG stimulator, peripheral neurostimulator, cranial neurostimulator, implantable programmable drug pump)
- Provide documentation of two sequential diagnostic blocks at the same level(s) showing positive response (≥80% relief for expected anesthetic duration)
Limit of two diagnostic injections at same level(s)
Only two diagnostic facet joint injections/medial branch nerve blocks are permitted at the same level(s); prior response(s) must be documented before requesting additional diagnostic procedures at the same level.
- More than two injections at the same level/side are considered therapeutic rather than diagnostic and must meet therapeutic criteria
- Authorization requests for additional diagnostic injections at the same level should include documentation of prior responses
Prior authorization may be required for listed CPT codes
CPT codes for facet joint/medial branch injections are listed in the policy and coverage may be subject to product-specific prior authorization processes; use the codes appropriate to guidance modality and levels treated when requesting authorization.
- Codes include 0213T–0218T (ultrasound E/I) and 64490–64495 (image guidance fluoroscopy/CT); product coverage may determine whether medical policy criteria apply
Therapeutic blocks allowed only if RFA is contraindicated
Therapeutic facet joint/medial branch blocks will be considered only when radiofrequency ablation/neurotomy is contraindicated and that contraindication is documented.
- Examples of contraindications that must be documented: established spinal pseudoarthrosis at the intended level or implanted electrical devices
Therapeutic alternative requires two sequential positive diagnostic blocks
Therapeutic injections as an alternative to RFA are permitted only after two sequential diagnostic blocks at the same level(s) demonstrating a positive response (defined by policy).
- A positive response is evidenced by at least 80% relief of facet‑mediated pain for at least the expected minimum duration of the local anesthetic
- Documentation of both sequential positive diagnostic blocks at the same level(s) must be included with the authorization request
Second diagnostic injection only if it will change management (RFA consideration)
A second diagnostic injection should be performed only when a successful result would lead to consideration of radiofrequency denervation/ablation at the diagnosed level(s).
- Intent to proceed to RFA if diagnostic is positive must be documented when requesting a second diagnostic block
Conservative treatment trial and documentation
Guideline-recommended conservative treatment should be documented; a 3-month trial of different conservative treatments is recommended before facet joint interventions.
- If conservative treatment is contraindicated, the reason(s) must be documented
- Policy also requires at least four weeks of appropriate conservative treatment in the prior three months (see initial diagnostic criteria)
Document level(s) treated and diagnostic response (≥80% relief)
Authorization requests must document the level(s) treated and the degree of pain relief after the initial diagnostic injection; a positive response is defined as at least 80% relief for the expected anesthetic duration.
- Document treated level(s) and the percent pain relief and expected duration of relief following the initial diagnostic block
- Second diagnostic block must be administered at the same level(s) as the initial block
Document two sequential positive diagnostic blocks for therapeutic alternative
When using therapeutic injections as an alternative to RFA, include documentation of two sequential diagnostic blocks at the same level(s) showing a positive response (≥80% relief for the expected anesthetic duration).
- Policy requires documentation that both sequential diagnostic blocks produced at least 80% relief for at least the expected minimum duration of the local anesthetic
- Include clinical notes demonstrating timing and measured pain relief for each diagnostic block
Synovial cyst aspiration requires advanced imaging and clinical correlation
When performing a facet joint injection with synovial cyst aspiration, provide advanced imaging (MRI, CT, or CT myelogram) confirming compression or displacement of the corresponding nerve root by the cyst and clinical correlation with radicular signs/symptoms.
- Include the diagnostic imaging study demonstrating nerve root compression/displacement by the synovial cyst
- Provide clinical correlation (history and physical exam) showing signs/symptoms of radicular pain or radiculopathy
Documentation required for repeat therapeutic injections (≥50% relief ≥12 weeks)
For repeat therapeutic facet joint injections/medial branch blocks, document that the prior injection produced ≥50% pain relief for at least 12 weeks before approving another therapeutic injection.
- Document magnitude of prior benefit (≥50%) and duration (≥12 weeks)
- Also confirm minimum interval of six months from the prior therapeutic injection when applicable
Required documentation: intent and prior injection responses (≥80% diagnostic response)
Authorization requests must clearly state the intent (diagnostic vs therapeutic), prior injection responses (positive response defined as ≥80% relief for expected anesthetic duration), and, when applicable, consideration of radiofrequency denervation if diagnostic block is successful.
- State whether the current request is diagnostic or therapeutic
- Provide documentation of prior injection responses; define positive diagnostic response as ≥80% relief for expected anesthetic duration
- When requesting injections contiguous to a fused segment, document prior negative blocks at the requested level if applicable
Documentation standard for diagnostic response (≥80% relief for expected duration)
Documented response to a diagnostic facet joint injection/medial branch block must be at least 80% relief of facet-mediated pain for at least the expected minimum duration of the local anesthetic; responses to the first two injections must be recorded.
- Record percent pain relief and the duration of relief consistent with the anesthetic used
- Ensure documentation shows the response to the first two diagnostic injections
Denial risk triggers and common denial reasons
Requests lacking documentation of at least four weeks of conservative treatment within the prior three months, procedures performed on more than three facet joint levels in the same session, performance on >3 contiguous levels, same-day invasive procedures without the allowed exception, or without required imaging guidance are at risk for denial.
- Missing documentation of ≥4 weeks conservative care in prior 3 months may trigger denial
- Injecting more than three facet joint levels in one session or >3 contiguous levels may be denied (exceptions for contiguous to posterior fusion apply)
- Same-day invasive procedures will be denied except the TFESI with synovial cyst aspiration exception
- Procedures performed without fluoroscopic or CT guidance are considered not medically necessary and may be denied
Imaging guidance required (fluoroscopy or CT)
Facet joint injections/medial branch nerve blocks performed without fluoroscopic or CT guidance are considered not medically necessary; authorization requests without image guidance documentation should be denied.
- Fluoroscopy or CT guidance must be documented for procedures; ultrasound guidance is listed as investigational in the policy
Same‑day invasive procedure restriction (denial risk)
Requests for facet joint injection or medial branch nerve block performed on the same day as another invasive procedure will be denied except when the facet injection is performed with a TFESI for synovial cyst aspiration (allowed exception).
- If same-day procedures are proposed, include justification and confirm whether the synovial cyst aspiration/TFESI exception applies
Contiguous level limit: >3 contiguous levels at risk for denial
Requests for procedures performed on more than three contiguous spinal levels are considered not medically necessary and may be denied; include documentation if the requested levels are contiguous with a posterior spinal fusion segment to support an exception.
- If requesting >3 contiguous levels, provide documentation that levels are contiguous with a posteriorly fused spinal motion segment to qualify for exception
Post‑ablation diagnostic injections are not routinely allowed
Additional diagnostic injections after a prior successful radiofrequency denervation/ablation at the requested level are considered not medically necessary and are at risk for denial.
- Provide documentation if prior RFA occurred and rationale if requesting additional diagnostic blocks at that level
Additional denial triggers and scheduling restrictions
Claims may be denied if procedures are performed above C2‑C3 or below L5‑S1, are scheduled as a series without evaluation of prior response, or when therapeutic injections are requested subsequent to the initial two diagnostic injections unless RFA is contraindicated.
- Procedures above C2‑C3 or below L5‑S1 are not medically necessary per policy
- Therapeutic injections after the initial two diagnostics are only allowed when RFA is contraindicated; otherwise at risk for denial
- Requests presenting series of injections without prior response data should include evaluation of prior injection outcomes to avoid denial
Verify contract/product coverage before authorization
Services are contract dependent; if a product does not cover a service, medical policy criteria do not apply and lack of product coverage may trigger denial.
- Verify product-level coverage before submitting authorization; if the product does not cover the service, do not rely on policy criteria to override product exclusions
Conservative Treatment Requirements
Document prior conservative care or contraindication — 4 weeks within prior 3 months
Covered when documentation requirement is met
Document prior conservative treatments and reasons for contraindication in the medical record.
Intent to proceed to RFA if diagnostic is positive — Operational/intent requirement for diagnostic pathway
Operational requirement when diagnostic pathway is used
Document intent (diagnostic vs therapeutic) in the medical record.
Trial of conservative care — 3 months recommended trial
Recommendation to guide clinical care prior to interventions
Grade C recommendation; documents the guideline-recommended interval.
Frequency and Quantity Limits
Imaging and Procedural Guidance Requirements
Obtain imaging to exclude other causes before diagnostic injection
Clinical findings and imaging studies must suggest no other obvious cause of axial pain prior to diagnostic facet joint injection; imaging to exclude other causes is required.
MRI/CT/CT myelogram required for synovial cyst aspiration
Facet joint injection with synovial cyst aspiration requires advanced diagnostic imaging (MRI, CT, or CT myelogram) confirming compression or displacement of the corresponding nerve root and clinical correlation.
Use fluoroscopy or CT guidance for facet injections/MBB
Facet joint injections and medial branch nerve blocks must be performed with fluoroscopic or CT guidance.
Fluoroscopy is standard; ultrasound guidance is investigational
The policy treats fluoroscopic guidance as the expected standard and considers ultrasound guidance investigational (not acceptable per policy).
Select CPT code matching the image guidance modality used
Some listed CPT codes describe procedures with fluoroscopy/CT guidance and others with ultrasound guidance; use the code that corresponds to the guidance modality used when billing.
- Image-guided codes: 64490–64495 for fluoroscopy/CT; 0213T–0218T denote ultrasound E/I designations.
Definitions
Background
Facet joint injections and medial branch nerve blocks are used primarily as diagnostic procedures to determine whether chronic axial neck, thoracic, or low back pain arises from the facet joints. The policy describes the diagnostic block as an injection performed to evaluate chronic axial pain (typically from levels C2–3 through L5–S1) and notes that a confirmatory second diagnostic block is required to validate a positive response before proceeding to radiofrequency denervation/ablation when that therapy is being considered.
Not Covered / Exclusions
Not covered (procedures considered not medically necessary) include injections performed without fluoroscopic or CT guidance, injections performed on the same day as another invasive procedure (except the limited TFESI + synovial cyst aspiration exception), procedures performed on more than three contiguous levels (unless contiguous with a posterior fusion), additional diagnostic injections after a successful radiofrequency denervation at the requested level, injections performed above C2–C3 or below L5–S1, therapeutic injections following the initial two diagnostic injections except when radiofrequency ablation is contraindicated, scheduling a series of injections without prior evaluation of response, and routine therapeutic MBB/IA injections without context as discouraged by guidelines.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.