| AASM position (Ramar et al., 2015) | Recommends collaboration between dentists and physicians for oral appliance therapy with follow-up sleep testing; supports custom, titratable appliances over non-custom in adults; oral appliances considered when CPAP intolerant |
| Hayes assessments (NightBalance; eXciteOSA; remedē) | Hayes finds low-to-very-low quality evidence for positional devices and eXciteOSA; for remedē (PNS) evidence limited/insufficient to draw definitive clinical conclusions though some RCTs show improvements |
| Cochrane (Srijithesh et al., 2019) / Positional therapy reviews (Barnes et al., 2017) | Positional therapy may improve short-term adherence but CPAP is superior for AHI reduction; overall evidence low-to-moderate and short-term |
| STAR trial (Strollo et al., 2014; STAR analyses) | In HNS STAR cohort (n=126) median AHI decreased 68% (29.3 → 9.0 events/hr) and ODI decreased 70% (25.4 → 7.4) at 12 months, with sustained benefits in follow-ups |
| remedē pivotal trial (Costanzo et al., 2016) and PAS (Costanzo et al., 2021) | In randomized remedē TPNS pivotal trial (n=151) at 6 months 51% of treatment group achieved ≥50% AHI reduction vs 11% control (difference 41%, 95% CI 25–54, p<0.0001); long-term PAS shows improvements but evidence judged limited |
| EPAP / Provent trials (Berry 2011; Kryger 2011; Walsh, Rosenthal, Colrain) | Randomized and extension studies show short-term reductions in AHI and ESS and high adherence in responders (eg, Berry: device-on AHI reduction 52.7% week1; Kryger 12-month cohort median AHI reduced 71.3% in analyzable responders), but studies limited by design, small samples, and manufacturer sponsorship |
| Nasal dilator meta-analysis (Camacho et al., 2016) and individual studies | Meta-analysis found most studies showed no significant change in AHI with internal or external nasal dilators; overall no clear OSA benefit |
| Meta-analyses / systematic reviews for positional devices and SPT (de Ruiter et al., 2018) and Hayes/ECRI reports | Sleep position trainer trials show AHI and ODI reductions similar to oral appliance in some studies at 3–12 months but higher dropout rates and short-term data; Hayes/ECRI conclude evidence inconclusive or low quality |
| RCT: Prefabricated vs custom MAD (Johal et al., 2017) | Custom mandibular advancement devices are superior to ready-made devices for AHI reduction in small RCT (n=35) with limitations |
| eXciteOSA evidence (Hayes, ECRI, Moffa, Kotecha, Baptista) | Single-arm and pre-post studies show small AHI/ODI/snoring improvements in mild OSA/snoring but evidence quality very low; conclusions inconclusive |
| Guideline & technology assessments (AASM, AAO-HNS, ERS, NICE, AHRQ summaries) | Guidelines generally recommend CPAP first; oral appliances supported for mild-moderate OSA or CPAP intolerance; HNS considered for select CPAP-intolerant patients with specified criteria; many novel devices have low-quality evidence |
| Remedē meta-analyses and reviews (Wang et al., 2023; ECRI summaries) | Systematic reviews/meta-analyses of PNS/TPNS show reductions in AHI/CAI but evidence limited; further RCTs and long-term data needed |