Evidence summary: Multiple systematic reviews and randomized trials are cited supporting benefits of gait training and supported standing in pediatric populations. Key references include Qian et al. (2023) (systematic review and network meta-analysis of gait training interventions, 20 RCTs, n=516), Chiu et al. (2020) (Cochrane review of mechanically assisted walking in children with cerebral palsy, 17 studies, n=451), Valenzuela-Aedo et al. (2024) (systematic review of assisted standing on bone mineral density in children with cerebral palsy), Paleg and Livingstone (2015a) (systematic review of gait trainer use in home and school settings), and Freeman et al. (2019) (multi-center RCT of a home-based standing frame program in progressive MS).
Reported outcomes: These studies report improvements in gait velocity, gross motor function measures (GMFM), walking performance, bone mineral density (femur and spine), range of motion, and some activity/participation measures depending on study design and population.
Limitations: The evidence base has notable limitations including small sample sizes, heterogeneous participant samples and standing/gait protocols, variable dosing and duration, risk of bias (lack of blinding, missing data), and a paucity of high-quality pediatric dosing studies — all of which limit the strength and generalizability of conclusions and indicate need for larger, higher-quality trials.