Loading...
Defines UnitedHealthcare coverage position for mechanical stretching devices (LLPS, SPS, PASS) for treatment of joint contractures of the extremities for Commercial and Individual Exchange plans, including applicable HCPCS codes and evidence summary. This is Part 1 of 2 and includes policy rationale, evidence review, applicable codes, FDA info, and revision history.
Template Update: Created shared policy version to support application to Oxford plan membership and archived previous policy version 2025T0481AA and DME 005.31.
Template Update - Created shared policy version to support application to Oxford plan membership.
Defines UnitedHealthcare coverage position for mechanical stretching devices (LLPS, SPS, PASS) for treatment of joint contractures of the extremities for Commercial and Individual Exchange plans. Part 1 of 2: includes policy rationale, evidence review, applicable HCPCS/DME codes, FDA information, and revision history. Policy Number: 2026T0481BB. Effective Date: January 1, 2026.
Coverage stance: Mixed — LLPS (Low-load prolonged-duration stretch devices) are covered (proven and medically necessary as an adjunct to therapy for treating existing joint contractures of the upper and lower extremities). SPS (Static progressive stretch) and PASS (Patient-actuated serial stretch) devices are not medically necessary due to insufficient evidence of efficacy.
Coverage Rationale
Coverage statements for device categories:
General application
Policy is informational and intended to assist interpretation of benefit plans; member-specific benefit plan governs.
Medical records documentation may be required to assess whether the member meets clinical criteria for coverage.
Document rationale if applying this policy to Medicare Advantage members.
| E1399 | Durable medical equipment, miscellaneous. |
| E1800 | Dynamic adjustable elbow extension and flexion device, includes soft interface material. |
| E1801 | Static progressive stretch/patient actualized serial stretch elbow device, extension and/or flexion, with or without range of motion adjustment, includes all components and accessories. |
| E1803 | Dynamic adjustable elbow extension only device, includes soft interface material. |
| E1804 | Dynamic adjustable elbow flexion only device, includes soft interface material. |
| E1806 | Static progressive stretch wrist device, flexion and/or extension, with or without range of motion adjustment, includes all components and accessories. |
| E1807 | Dynamic adjustable wrist extension only device, includes soft interface material. |
| E1808 | Dynamic adjustable wrist flexion only device, includes soft interface material. |
| E1810 | Dynamic adjustable knee extension and flexion device, includes soft interface material. |
| E1811 | Static progressive stretch/patient actualized serial stretch knee device, extension and/or flexion, with or without range of motion adjustment, includes all components and accessories. |
| 2025T0481AA | Archived previous policy version |
| DME 005.31 | Archived DME policy reference |
| 2025T0481AA | Archived previous policy version |
| DME 005.31 | Archived DME policy reference |
Medical records documentation may be required
Medical records documentation may be required to assess whether the member meets the clinical criteria for coverage; benefit coverage is determined by the member specific benefit plan document and applicable laws. Documentation does not guarantee coverage.
Reference member-specific benefit plan
Providers must reference the member specific benefit plan document (and applicable federal/state mandates) when determining coverage because plan terms may differ from this standard policy; in the event of a conflict, the member specific benefit plan governs.
Use evidence-based rationale for Medicare Advantage
When no Medicare NCD/LCD exists, Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) may create coverage determinations using objective evidence-based rationale and authoritative evidence; document the rationale if applying this policy to Medicare Advantage members.
Mechanical stretching devices (dynamic splinting systems) are used to prevent and treat joint contractures by providing controlled joint mobilization to maintain or restore joint range of motion. The policy groups devices into three categories: LLPS (low-load prolonged-duration stretch or dynamic splinting systems used often during rest/sleep), SPS (static progressive splints that hold a joint at a set position with manual angle adjustment and do not exert continuous motion stress), and PASS (patient-actuated serial stretch devices that use pneumatic or hydraulic loading adjusted by the patient). The evidence summary states that LLPS devices have demonstrated effectiveness for certain joints (finger, wrist, elbow, knee, toes) in some trials and reviews, whereas SPS and PASS lack sufficient evidence in the published literature to demonstrate safety and efficacy for treating joint contractures.
| Evidence source | Summary / relevance |
|---|---|
| Hayes technology report | Hayes review (2018, updated 2022) concluded evidence insufficient for SPS, PASS, or LLPS for indications other than finger extensor injury; noted fair-to-low quality studies, small benefits in ROM with LLPS but limited clinical meaningfulness and paucity of studies for many joints. |
| Randomized controlled trials / Systematic reviews | Multiple RCTs and systematic reviews cited: some RCTs and systematic reviews show LLPS (dynamic) benefits for certain joints (finger, wrist, elbow, knee, toes) while overall evidence is mixed; systematic reviews report variable results and methodological limitations. |
| Pilot feasibility cohort comparison | Pilot feasibility study (Rauzi et al. 2022) of multimodal PT including static progressive splinting for arthrofibrosis after TKA showed feasibility with similar ROM outcomes to manipulation under anesthesia in a small retrospective comparison; limited by small size and design. |
| Prospective randomized trial / systematic review evidence (LLPS lower extremity) | Systematic review (Furia et al. 2013) and prospective trials indicate dynamic splinting with prolonged passive stretching can improve lower extremity ROM and that hours of stretching correlate with AROM gains; evidence supports LLPS efficacy for some lower-extremity contractures but quality and generalizability vary. |
| Randomized controlled trial - adhesive capsulitis | Teytelbaum et al. (2024) RCT comparing at-home high-intensity stretch device to PT (and combined) in adhesive capsulitis found greater ROM restoration and improved patient-reported scores with the device; authors noted limitations and need for further investigation. |
| Systematic review - posttraumatic elbow stiffness | Veltman et al. (2015) systematic review found both SPS and dynamic splinting produced good results for elbow stiffness; post-splinting ROM slightly favored SPS in included studies, but choice depends on clinician/patient preference and evidence base is limited. |
Definitions
Also called dynamic splinting; used for finger, wrist, elbow, knee, ankle, toes; may be prefabricated or custom.
Also described as inelastic traction; allow manual angle adjustment.
Provide adjustable low- to high-level load using pneumatic or hydraulic systems per device protocols.
When making coverage decisions, the member-specific benefit plan governs and medical records documentation may be required to assess whether clinical criteria are met. In the absence of a Medicare NCD/LCD, Medicare Advantage Organizations (MAOs) may create their own coverage determinations using objective evidence-based rationale; the brief does not list a Medicare effective date or number for a Medicare NCD (fields empty) and advises that rationale should be documented when applying this policy to MA members.
Template Update: Created shared policy version to support application to Oxford plan membership and archived previous policy version 2025T0481AA and DME 005.31.
Archived previous policy version 2025T0481AA and DME 005.31 (prior policy references archived during template update).