Breast reconstruction with allogeneic ADM: Randomized trials and systematic reviews show ADM use can inform individualized decision-making in breast reconstruction when tissue coverage is limited; evidence is sufficient to conclude improvement in net health outcome for selected patients, recognizing higher rates of some complications (eg, seroma, infection) in some reports.
Apply when clinical criteria for ADM use are met
Diabetic lower-extremity ulcers: For diabetic foot ulcers, RCT evidence demonstrates improved complete wound healing at ≥12 weeks for certain products (eg, AlloPatch, Apligraf, Dermagraft, Integra, mVASC, TheraSkin); evidence supports medical necessity for those products. Evidence for other ADM products (eg, DermACELL, GraftJacket, Cytal, PriMatrix, Oasis, Kerecis) is limited, subgroup-restricted, or pending further study and is considered insufficient to establish net health benefit for general use.
Product-specific evidence distinctions noted
Venous insufficiency lower-extremity ulcers: RCTs support the efficacy of Apligraf and Oasis Wound Matrix over standard of care for venous insufficiency ulcers; these products have sufficient evidence to be considered medically necessary when other criteria are met. Evidence for other products is insufficient or mixed.
Apply prior conservative therapy requirement as specified
Deep dermal burns: Biosynthetic skin substitutes such as Integra Dermal Regeneration Template and Epicel (HDE) have comparative evidence or regulatory approvals supporting improved outcomes for deep dermal/full-thickness burns; ReCell has mixed/limited evidence and requires additional RCT data for definitive conclusions.
Follow product indications and evidence
Tendon/rotator cuff repair: Limited RCT evidence (eg, GraftJacket) shows potential benefit in rotator cuff repair but additional larger studies are needed; current evidence is insufficient to conclude a consistent net health outcome improvement for routine use.
Consider investigational/not medically necessary when criteria not met
Hernia/parastomal reinforcement: RCTs comparing acellular collagen scaffolds to synthetic mesh or no reinforcement have not shown outcome advantages; evidence is insufficient to determine net health benefit for these indications.
Not supported as routine therapy based on current evidence
Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: OrCel received HDE approval for hand reconstruction in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with case series evidence; overall evidence is insufficient to establish improvement in net health outcome beyond the HDE context.HDE context
Use limited to HDE-specified applications
BEAR implant for ACL repair: RCTs and systematic reviews suggest BEAR implant may be noninferior to ACL reconstruction on several outcomes at 2 years with potential advantages (eg, hamstring strength) but possibly higher revision rates; longer-term data and broader experience are needed to fully define net health outcomes. Indicated for skeletally mature patients ≥14 years with complete ACL tear and intact tibial stump.Patient age ≥14 years; skeletally mature; intact tibial stump
Apply device-specific indication and evidence