| Hoffner 2018 registry (liposuction + CCT) | Prospective registry n=105 non-pitting secondary arm lymphedema; mean postoperative reduction at 5 years 117% ± 26% vs healthy arm; inclusion: ≥10% excess arm volume, no/minimal pitting; no adverse events reported |
| Lamprou 2017 CSAL (leg) | Cohort n=88 unilateral end-stage primary/secondary leg lymphedema; primary group median preop volume diff 3686 ml → 761 ml at 2 years (79% reduction); secondary group median reduced to −38 ml (100% reduction) at 2 years |
| Garza 2022 simultaneous VLNT + LVB | Retrospective review n=220 patients; mean volume reduction 21.4% at 1 yr, 36.2% at 2 yrs; complication rate 12.7%; overall flap survival 99.6% |
| Basta et al. 2014 meta-analysis (microsurgery) | 27 studies, n=1619; excess circumference reduction 48.8% ± 6.0%; excess volume reduction 56.6% ± 9.1%; 91.2% subjective improvement; 11.8% had no improvement |
| Carl et al. 2017 systematic review pooled surgical effect sizes | Reported mean excess volume reduction: liposuction 96.6%, LVA 33.1%, VLNT 26.4% (heterogeneous studies, limited quality) |
| Li et al. 2021 intra-abdominal VLNT pooled outcomes | Meta-analysis n=594; mean reduction rates ranged 0.38%–70.8% across studies; pooled donor-site complication rate 1.4%, recipient-site 3.2% |
| Combined VLNT + liposuction (Leppäpuska 2019 / other series) | Combined technique showed greater mean excess volume reduction (example: 87.7% in one series) and greater improvements in lymphoscintigraphy and cellulitis reduction vs LNT alone |
| Liposuction pooled comparative outcomes (Chang 2021) | Two comparative studies (stage II) pooled ~63.95% volume reduction vs controlled compression therapy (very low-quality evidence); multiple case series variably report substantial reductions |
| LVA (Rodriguez & Yamamoto 2022; systematic reviews) | Retrospective review n=229: upper extremity median volume reduction 67% (100% achieved reduction); lower extremity median 41% (86.8% achieved reduction); systematic reviews note heterogeneity and low-quality evidence but frequent objective/subjective improvements |
| Adverse events / complications summary | Reported AEs across studies: hyperpigmentation, cellulitis, skin paddle congestion, venous thrombosis, partial skin ulceration, seroma, hematoma, wound dehiscence, lymphatic leakage, numbness, pulmonary embolus, skin necrosis, donor-site complications (chyle leak, lymphorrhea). Garza cohort complications 12.7% |
| Cochrane / Markkula 2019 conclusion | Cochrane review: insufficient evidence to support widespread adoption of LVA or VLNT for prevention/treatment of breast cancer–related lymphedema; potential benefit when performed by expert surgeons |
| VLNT HRQoL and mixed evidence (Fish 2020, systematic reviews) | Limited prospective cohorts report favorable HRQoL at 12 months for VLNT; overall evidence heterogeneous and low/very low quality |
| Systematic reviews / Meta-analyses overall assessment (Chang 2021, Forte, others) | Multiple systematic reviews/meta-analyses find signal of benefit (volume/circumference reduction, decreased cellulitis, improved QoL) but emphasize poor study quality, heterogeneity, small samples, need for RCTs |