Background: Molecular pathology procedures analyze nucleic acids (DNA, RNA) to detect germline or somatic variants and inform diagnosis, prognosis, therapeutic selection, or histocompatibility testing. Code selection is typically based on the specific gene(s) analyzed.
Genomic Sequencing Procedures (GSPs) and other molecular multianalyte assays (including next-generation sequencing [NGS], massive parallel sequencing, and chromosomal microarray) simultaneously assay multiple genes or regions and may target panels, the exome, or whole genome. These technologies enable analysis of many genes at once and have increased availability of multigene panels for inherited disorders, cancer, and reproductive testing.
Analytic and clinical validity: While limited direct comparisons exist, concordance between NGS and Sanger sequencing has been reported as >99% for several indications. However, newer sequencing methods were initially associated with higher error rates and panels can generate large amounts of ancillary information of uncertain significance.
Variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are common and increase with panel size, approaching nearly 50% for large gene panels. Clinical validity and clinical utility of panels are condition-specific; many panels include variants with variable penetrance and limited clinical management guidance, and published data are lacking to demonstrate improved health outcomes for some panel uses.
Panel composition is not standardized: different commercial products for the same condition may test different gene sets and panel contents can change over time as new variants are discovered. These factors contribute to variable evidence for clinical outcomes and potential harms when clinical management pathways are not well defined.