Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPolicy UpdatesWound CareBCBSM skin and tissue substitutes Coverage Update …
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

    Modifiedblue cross blue shield - michiganPolicy N/A

    Skin and tissue substitutes (bioengineered skin and amniotic products)

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for all blue cross blue shield - michigan policy alerts

    Know when blue cross blue shield - michigan releases new policies or updates existing guidance.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Defines medical necessity, non-coverage, and coverage criteria for skin and tissue substitute products (including amniotic/placental products) across wound care, breast reconstruction, burns, ophthalmologic and select other indications for BCBSM/BCN Medicare Advantage.

    Policy Summary
    Payerblue cross blue shield - michigan
    PolicySkin and tissue substitutes (bioengineered skin and amniotic products)
    Policy CodePolicy N/A
    Change TypeMaterial updates: ophthalmic indications addedDFU/VLU criteria/coding removed and routed to LCD
    Effective DateDec 26, 2025
    Next Review DateN/A
    Key ActionDocument prior trial of standard of care (minimum 4 weeks, with ≤50% ulcer area reduction) and submit product HCPCS, CPT application code, and applicable ICD-10 with claims.
    SourceLink
    POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

    Policy statement updated to include ophthalmic indications and other amniotic products limitations; summary of evidence reformatted to include ophthalmic and other conditions.

    Internal clinical coverage criteria for DFU and VLU were removed and readers referred to the applicable Local Coverage Determination (LCD).

    Codes related to DFU and VLU removed from coding section due to being included in related Local Coverage Article.

    8+distinct clinically addressed indications
    4 weeksSOC trial duration required
    >=50%ulcer area reduction threshold
    30% TBSAEPICEL TBSA indication
    >12%HbA1c exclusion threshold
    ~280+investigational Q-codes listed

    Coverage Criteria and Medical Necessity

    Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction — ANY logic, coverage when any one met

    Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction Skin and tissue substitutes are considered medically necessary for the treatment of postmastectomy breast reconstruction when ONE of the following criteria is met:

    When there is insufficient tissue expander or implant coverage by the pectoralis major muscle and additional coverage is required.
    When there are viable but compromised or thin postmastectomy skin flaps that are at risk of dehiscence or necrosis.
    When the inframammary fold and lateral mammary folds have been undermined during mastectomy and reestablishment of these landmarks is needed.

    Diabetic Foot Ulcers — ALL required criteria for coverage

    Diabetic Foot Ulcers Skin and tissue substitutes are considered medically necessary for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers when ALL of the following criteria are met:

    Physician documentation of medical management for clinically documented type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
    Failure to achieve at least 50% ulcer area reduction with a minimum of 4 weeks of documented compliance with standard of care (SOC) treatment which includes but is not limited to mechanical offloading, infection control, limb elevation, debridement of necrotic tissue, management of systemic disease and medications, nutrition assessment, tissue perfusion and oxygenation, education regarding care of the foot, and appropriate footwear and counseling on tobacco use.
    The wound is a non‑infected full thickness neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer of at least 1.0 cm2 in size due to clinically documented diabetic neuropathy.
    The ulcer extends through the dermis but does not involve tendon, muscle, capsule, or bone exposure.
    There is adequate arterial blood supply to support tissue growth.
    The foot is free of Charcot arthropathy.

    Chronic Venous Insufficiency Lower Extremity Ulcer — ALL required criteria

    Chronic Venous Insufficiency Lower Extremity Ulcer Skin and tissue substitutes are considered medically necessary for the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency ulcers when ALL of the following criteria are met:

    Physician documentation of medical management for clinically documented chronic lower extremity venous insufficiency.
    Failure to achieve at least 50% ulcer area reduction with a minimum of 4 weeks of documented compliance with standard of care (SOC) treatment which includes but is not limited to infection control, mechanical compression, limb elevation, debridement of necrotic tissue, management of systemic disease and medications, nutrition assessment, tissue perfusion and oxygenation, education regarding care, and counseling on tobacco use.
    The wound is a non‑infected full thickness venous stasis ulcer of at least 1.0 cm2 in size due to clinically documented venous insufficiency.
    The ulcer extends through the dermis but does not involve tendon, muscle, capsule, or bone exposure.
    There is adequate arterial blood supply to support tissue growth.

    Second- or Third-Degree Burns — ALL required criteria

    Second‑ or Third‑Degree Burns Skin and tissue substitutes are considered medically necessary for the treatment of second‑ and third‑degree burns when ALL of the following criteria are met:

    The wound has been thoroughly debrided to remove necrotic tissue, bacteria, and other debris.
    The wound is hemostatic with minimal bleeding to ensure optimal graft take.
    The wound is free of infection or has a controlled infection as evidenced by negative cultures or significant reduction in bacterial load.
    Healthy granulation tissue is present to support skin substitute take and integration.

    Ophthalmologic Conditions (Amniotic membrane grafts) — ALL required criteria and prior conservative therapy

    Ophthalmologic Conditions (Amniotic membrane grafts) Human amniotic membrane (HAM) grafts with or without suture are considered medically necessary for the following ophthalmic indications when the specified conservative therapy requirements are met:

    Neurotrophic keratitis with ocular surface damage and inflammation that does not respond to conservative therapy.
    Corneal ulcers and melts that do not respond to initial conservative therapy.
    Corneal perforation when there is active inflammation after corneal transplant requiring adjunctive treatment.
    Bullous keratopathy as a palliative measure in patients who are not candidates for curative treatment (e.g., endothelial or penetrating keratoplasty).
    Partial limbal stem cell deficiency with extensive diseased tissue where selective removal alone is not sufficient.

    Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa — ALL required criteria

    Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa The following product may be considered medically necessary for treatment of mitten‑hand deformity in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa when provided in accordance with FDA Humanitarian Device Exemption (HDE) specifications and after failure of standard wound therapy:

    ORCEL™ used in accordance with its HDE labeling for hand reconstruction surgery in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

    Initial Use Criteria — ALL required initial use elements

    Initial Use Criteria The following elements are required for initial use of skin and tissue substitute products (applies to covered indications unless otherwise specified):

    Documentation of diagnosis and wound characteristics (size in cm2, depth, anatomic location, duration, and prior treatments).
    Evidence of adherence to and failure of an appropriate period of standard of care (minimum 4 weeks unless indication specifies otherwise).
    Evidence of adequate perfusion to support tissue growth (palpable pedal pulses or ABI > 0.70 as appropriate).
    Wound bed preparation completed (debridement, control of infection/bioburden, removal of necrotic tissue) prior to application.
    For diabetic foot ulcers: documentation of medical management of diabetes and HbA1c ≤ 12% unless otherwise justified.

    Investigational / Not Reasonable and Necessary — list of investigational uses and exclusions

    Investigational / Not Reasonable and Necessary — Uses and exclusions

    All skin or soft tissue substitute products and uses not explicitly listed in the medically necessary sections above are considered investigational and not medically necessary due to insufficient evidence.
    Use following Mohs micrographic surgery is considered investigational.
    Surgical repair of hernias or parastomal reinforcement with these products is investigational.
    Amniotic membrane, amniotic fluid, or other placental‑derived product injections/applications for musculoskeletal conditions (e.g., pain, tendon, joint conditions) are investigational — refer to appropriate MAC LCD for musculoskeletal indications.
    Liquid or gel skin substitute products for ulcer treatment are not considered grafts and are not covered.

    Use of skin substitutes for chronic wounds — ALL required criteria

    Use of skin substitutes for chronic wounds — required criteria

    Chronic, noninfected wound that has failed to respond to at least 4 weeks of standard of care (SOC) therapy.
    Wound is full‑thickness but does not have exposed tendon, joint capsule, or bone.
    Adequate arterial perfusion to support healing (palpable pulses or ABI > 0.70).
    Wound bed adequately prepared (debridement, infection control, moisture balance) prior to application.
    Documentation of wound size and progression (photographs and measurements) to demonstrate lack of adequate response to SOC.

    Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU) — product‑specific RCT evidence and inclusion criteria (coverage summary)

    Diabetic Foot Ulcers (Product‑specific RCT evidence and inclusion criteria)

    For patients with diabetic lower‑extremity ulcers meeting the policy DFU criteria, randomized controlled trial evidence supports the use of specific products listed in the DFU medically necessary product list.
    Product selection should align with the evidence base and documented inclusion criteria (e.g., noninfected, full‑thickness, size thresholds, prior SOC failure).

    Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) — inclusion criteria and adjunctive use to SOC

    Venous Leg Ulcers (VLU) — inclusion criteria and adjunctive use to SOC

    For patients with venous stasis lower‑extremity ulcers who meet the VLU clinical criteria, RCTs have demonstrated benefit for select products listed in the VLU covered product list.
    Skin substitutes for VLU should be used as an adjunct to compression therapy and other SOC measures; they are not a substitute for compression.

    Breast Reconstruction — coverage when used per surgical need and evidence

    Breast Reconstruction — coverage when used per surgical need and evidence

    For implant‑based breast reconstruction with inadequate native tissue coverage or compromised skin flaps, use of listed allogeneic acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) and other covered products may be considered medically necessary when criteria are met.
    Providers should discuss potential benefits and risks with patients, consistent with FDA communications regarding ADM use in breast reconstruction.

    Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa — limited/conditional coverage summary

    Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa — limited/conditional coverage summary

    OrCel® may be covered for HDE‑specified use (mitten‑hand deformity) when standard wound therapy has failed and treatment follows HDE labeling and documentation requirements.

    Deep Dermal Burns — coverage when donor skin limited or per FDA‑labeled indications

    Deep Dermal Burns — covered when donor skin limited or per FDA‑labeled indications

    Epicel® is covered when used in accordance with its HDE for extensive full‑thickness burns lacking sufficient donor skin (e.g., ≥ 30% TBSA as specified).
    Integra® and TransCyte® are covered for second‑ and third‑degree burns when the burn care criteria are met and as indicated by product labeling and evidence.

    HAM ophthalmic indications — mixed evidence and indication-specific coverage notes

    Ophthalmologic HAM indications — mixed evidence and indication‑specific coverage notes

    Select HAM products are covered for the ophthalmic indications listed when prior conservative therapy has failed and the specific clinical criteria are met (see ophthalmologic criteria group).
    HAM is investigational for ophthalmic uses not explicitly listed in the ophthalmologic criteria section.

    Musculoskeletal — refer to separate MAC LCD (coverage routing)

    Musculoskeletal — refer to separate MAC LCD (coverage routing)

    Amniotic membrane, amniotic fluid, and other placental‑derived product injections or applications for musculoskeletal indications are considered investigational within this policy and are governed by the applicable MAC LCD for musculoskeletal indications.
    Refer to the designated Local Coverage Determination for coverage rules, indications, and documentation requirements for non‑wound musculoskeletal uses.

    Indication-specific coverage summaries — multiple indication-level summaries bundled

    Indication‑specific coverage summaries — multiple indication‑level summaries bundled

    Coverage decisions are indication specific: products listed as covered for a given indication are only approved for that indication.
    Unlisted products or uses for a covered indication are investigational and not medically necessary.
    Claims must include product HCPCS, CPT application code, and applicable ICD‑10 codes supporting site, severity, and indication.

    Evidence summaries for listed products — per-product documented evidence stance (excerpt)

    Evidence summaries for listed products — per‑product documented evidence stance (excerpt)

    The policy references randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews where available and summarizes product‑specific evidence in Table 5 (evidence table).
    Evidence sufficiency varies by indication and product; products listed as covered have sufficient evidence to support meaningful improvement in net health outcome for the specified indications when criteria are met.

    Breast reconstruction following mastectomy — covered products criteria group

    Breast reconstruction following mastectomy — covered products criteria group

    Covered ADM and dermal matrix products for breast reconstruction are limited to those specifically listed in the breast reconstruction product table and require documentation of the clinical indications identified in the postmastectomy criteria group.
    Claims using Q4100 for unspecified skin substitute must include product name, package size purchased, amount applied, and amount wasted in the claim narrative/remarks.

    Breast reconstruction — coverage stance (summary statement)

    Breast reconstruction — coverage stance (summary statement)

    When surgical circumstances warrant additional soft tissue support or coverage and the listed criteria are met, covered ADM and related products may be considered medically necessary.
    All other products and uses for breast reconstruction not explicitly listed are investigational and not medically necessary.

    Diabetic foot ulcer — coverage stance (policy-level statement)

    Diabetic foot ulcer — coverage stance (policy‑level statement)

    Coverage for DFU is conditional on meeting the detailed clinical criteria (see DFU criteria group) and use of products listed in the DFU covered product table.
    DFU claims must include appropriate HCPCS product codes, CPT application codes, and ICD‑10 codes (including L‑codes where applicable).

    Venous insufficiency leg ulcer — coverage stance (policy-level statement)

    Venous insufficiency leg ulcer — coverage stance (policy‑level statement)

    Coverage for VLU is conditional on meeting clinical criteria and use of products listed in the VLU covered product table, with adjunctive compression and SOC measures documented.
    VLU claims must include appropriate HCPCS product codes, CPT application codes, and ICD‑10 codes (including L‑codes where applicable).

    Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa — Coverage statement with required criteria

    Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa — Coverage statement with required criteria

    OrCel® is covered only for the HDE‑specified indication (mitten‑hand deformity) with documentation that standard wound therapy has failed and HDE labeling followed.
    Claims must include Q4100 with the required narrative details when applicable.

    Second- and Third-degree Burns — Coverage statement with required criteria

    Second‑ and Third‑Degree Burns — Coverage statement with required criteria

    Epicel®, Integra®, and TransCyte® may be covered for second‑ and third‑degree burns when the burn care criteria are met and product labeling/HDE requirements (where applicable) are followed.
    Claims must include appropriate HCPCS product codes, CPT application codes, and relevant burn ICD‑10 codes.

    Ophthalmologic Conditions — Coverage statement with required criteria

    Ophthalmologic Conditions — Coverage statement with required criteria

    HAM products listed for ophthalmic indications are covered when the indication‑specific criteria and prior conservative therapy requirements are met and appropriate CPT codes (65778, 65779, etc.) are used.
    HAM for unlisted ophthalmic indications is investigational.

    Venous Insufficiency Leg Ulcer — Coverage statement (detailed criteria)

    Venous Insufficiency Leg Ulcer — Coverage statement (detailed criteria)

    VLU coverage requires documented venous insufficiency, failure of at least 4 weeks of SOC including compression, wound size ≥ 1.0 cm2, full‑thickness noninfected ulcer without tendon/muscle/capsule/bone exposure, and adequate perfusion.
    Covered products for VLU are limited to those listed in the VLU product table.

    Investigational / Not Medically Necessary — explicit list of products not covered

    Investigational / Not Medically Necessary — explicit list of products not covered

    Any product or HCPCS code listed in the investigational product code lists and tables within this policy are considered investigational and not medically necessary for all indications unless explicitly listed as covered for a specific indication.
    Unlisted codes submitted for non‑covered services addressed in this policy will be denied as not covered.

    Investigational — insufficient evidence list and rationale

    Investigational — insufficient evidence list and rationale

    A large number of amniotic, placental‑derived, acellular, cellular, and matrix‑like products lack sufficient peer‑reviewed, high‑quality evidence to support clinical effectiveness. These are listed in the policy's investigational product tables (Q42xx–Q43xx, etc.).
    Products without identified literature or with only case reports/limited studies are not considered medically necessary.

    DFU/VLU coverage routing — policy history directing DFU/VLU to LCDs

    DFU/VLU coverage routing — policy history directing DFU/VLU to LCDs

    Policy history documents that DFU and VLU internal criteria were removed and routing to applicable Local Coverage Determinations (LCDs) or Local Coverage Articles (LCAs) may apply when CMS/MAC determinations are in effect.
    Interim updates have alternately removed and reinstated internal DFU/VLU criteria based on MAC/LCD publication status; providers should follow the most current guidance referenced in the policy history.

    Coding, Billing Codes, and Thresholds

    Investigational / Not Medically Necessary - HCPCS/Q-codes (selected)HCPCSNot Covered
    Q4179FlowerDerm ™
    Q4181(product placeholder)
    Q4183(product placeholder)
    Q4184(product placeholder)
    Q4185(product placeholder)
    Q4188(product placeholder)
    Q4189(product placeholder)
    Q4190(product placeholder)
    Q4191Restorigin ™ (Q4191)
    Q4192Restorigin ™ (Q4192)
    1–10 of 90
    1/9
    Not Medically Necessary — Codes that Do Not Support Medical NecessityICD-10Not Covered
    A49.01-A49.8Bacterial infection of unspecified site
    B78.1Cutaneous strongyloidiasis
    B95.0-B95.8Streptococcus, staphylococcus, enterococcus, and other bacterial agents as cause of diseases elsewhere
    B96.0-B96.89Other bacterial agents as cause of diseases classified elsewhere
    E83.2Disorders of zinc metabolism
    I96Gangrene
    L08.82-L08.9Other and unspecified local infections of skin and subcutaneous tissue
    M72.6Necrotizing fasciitis
    M86.00-M86.9Osteomyelitis
    M87.00-M87.9Osteonecrosis
    1–10 of 11
    1/2
    FDA Product Codes (examples)mixed
    FTMCellular/tissue product regulation code (examples in policy)
    OXFFDA product code referenced for acellular dermal matrix
    PFCLiving cell therapy product code example
    FDA Regulation Statuses (selected)mixed
    361 HCT/PRegulation status for many allografts
    PMAPremarket approval (example: Apligraf, Dermagraft)
    510(k)510(k) cleared devices (examples listed)
    HDEHumanitarian Device Exemption (e.g., Epicel)
    Device Regulatory Status (examples)mixed
    PMAPMA examples: Apligraf, Dermagraft
    HDEHDE example: Epicel
    Covered HCPCS Codes — Breast ReconstructionHCPCSCovered
    Q4100ORCEL - skin substitute, not otherwise specified (use with ORCEL™)
    Q4107GRAFTJACKET®
    Q4116ALLODERM®
    Q4122DERMACELL ™ / DERMACELL AWM®
    Q4128FLEXHD® / ALLOPATCHHD
    Coding Guidance — Notesmixed
    NoteIf reporting Q4100, include product name, package size, amount applied and amount wasted in claim narrative/remarks or claim may be returned/rejected.
    Breast Reconstruction HCPCS Product CodesHCPCSCovered
    Q4100Skin substitute, not otherwise specified (ORCEL use)
    Q4107GRAFTJACKET®
    Q4116ALLODERM®
    Q4122DERMACELL ™
    Q4128FLEXHD® / ALLOPATCHHD
    Diabetic Foot Ulcer — Covered HCPCS Codes (selected)HCPCSCovered
    A2019KERECIS OMEGA3 MARIGEN SHIELD (A2019)
    Q4101APLIGRAF®
    Q4102OASIS® WOUND MATRIX
    Q4105INTEGRA® DRT / OMNIGRAFT ™ DRM
    Q4106DERMAGRAFT®
    Q4107GRAFTJACKET NOW ™
    Q4110PRIMATRIX®
    Q4121THERASKIN®
    Q4122DERMACELL AWM®
    Q4128ALLOPATCH® PLIABLE
    1–10 of 18
    1/2
    Venous Insufficiency Leg Ulcer — Covered HCPCS CodesHCPCSCovered
    Q4101APLIGRAF®
    Q4102OASIS® WOUND MATRIX
    Q4106DERMAGRAFT®
    Q4151AMNIOBAND®
    Q4186EPIFIX®
    CPT/HCPCS Application and Low-Cost Graft Codesmixed
    15271Application of skin substitute graft to trunk, arms, legs; up to 100 sq cm; first 25 sq cm or less
    15272Each additional 25 sq cm (list separately)
    15273Application of skin substitute graft to trunk/arms/legs; first 100 sq cm
    15274Each additional 100 sq cm (list separately)
    C5271Low-cost skin substitute application, trunk/arms/legs, first 25 sq cm
    C5272Low-cost additional 25 sq cm
    ICD-10 Codes Supporting Medical Necessity (selected)ICD-10
    E08.00-E13.9Diabetes mellitus range
    I83.011-I83.99Varicose veins with ulcer code range supporting VLU
    L97.111-L97.826Non-pressure chronic ulcer codes (site/severity)
    T20.20XA-T25.799SSecond-/third-degree burn codes (site and extent)
    Q81.2Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa
    ICD-10 Codes — Venous Insufficiency Ulcer (partial list)ICD-10
    I87.011-I87.333Post thrombotic syndrome and chronic venous hypertension with ulcer/inflammation
    L97.311-L97.526Non-pressure chronic ulcer codes for ankle/foot
    Covered HCPCS Product Codes for Specific IndicationsHCPCSCovered
    V2790Amniotic membrane for surgical reconstruction, per procedure
    Q4100ORCEL - skin substitute, not otherwise specified (use with ORCEL™)
    Q4116ALLODERM® (breast reconstruction)
    CPT Application Codes — Ophthalmologic & Other ApplicationsCPT
    65778Placement of amniotic membrane on ocular surface; without sutures
    65779Placement of amniotic membrane on ocular surface; single layer, sutured
    65780Ocular surface reconstruction; amniotic membrane transplantation, multiple layers
    15271Application of skin substitute graft; wound area billing thresholds (first 25 sq cm)
    ICD-10 Codes — Burns (ranges) (partial)ICD-10
    T20.20XA-T25.799SBurns second/third degree by site
    T31.0-T31.99Burn extent by TBSA
    T32.0-T32.99Corrosions extent
    HCPCS for Ophthalmologic Amniotic Membrane (covered)HCPCSCovered
    Q4130(example product code listed in investigational table)
    Q4151AMNIOBAND® (covered for ophthalmic/DFU/VLU per context)
    Investigational / Not Medically Necessary — Large HCPCS/Q-code Mapping (selected)HCPCSNot Covered
    Q4111GAMMAGRAFT
    Q4112CYMETRA, injectable
    Q4113GRAFTJACKET XPRESS, injectable
    Q4114INTEGRA FLOWABLE WOUND MATRIX, injectable
    Q4115ALLOSKIN
    Q4117HYALOMATRIX
    Q4118MATRISTEM MICROMATRIX
    Q4123ALLOSKIN RT
    Q4124OASIS® ULTRA TRI-LAYER WOUND MATRIX
    Q4125ARTHROFLEX
    1–10 of 31
    1/4
    Investigational CAMP Product HCPCS/Q-codes (selected)HCPCSNot Covered
    Q4136EZ-DERM
    Q4347RAMPART DL
    Q4350PALISADE DM
    Q4351ENCLOSE TL
    Q4354PALINGEN DUAL-LAYER MEMBRANE
    Q4356ABIOMEND XPLUS
    Q4357ABIOMEND
    Placeholder / No Codes Listedmixed
    N/ANo codes in this placeholder table
    Coding Updates and Notesmixed
    HistoryPolicy history includes numerous code status updates (see policy history).
    LCD/LCA NoteDFU/VLU coding referenced to applicable LCD/LCA per service area; removed/updated per history.

    Provider Actions, Prior Authorization, and Documentation

    Prior Authorization

    Ophthalmic amniotic membrane CPTs require specified clinical criteria and prior conservative therapy

    Coverage for CPT 65778 and 65779 is conditional on meeting the ophthalmologic clinical criteria listed in the policy (e.g., neurotrophic keratitis, corneal ulcers/melts, corneal perforation with active inflammation, persistent epithelial defects, DEWS 3–4 after Steps 1–3, pterygium repair when conjunctival autograft unavailable) and documenting prior escalation through conservative dry eye/ocular-surface therapy as specified (Steps 1–3).

    • CPT 65778 — placement of amniotic membrane without sutures
    • CPT 65779 — placement of amniotic membrane, single layer sutured
    Denial Risk

    PA implication for non‑covered/off‑label product codes — verify PA and notify members

    The policy specifies many named non‑covered Q/C/A codes and states claims submitted with listed non‑covered product codes will be denied; providers should verify prior authorization or pre-notification requirements before using products outside the listed, indication‑specific coverage and notify members if a service is not covered.

    Background, Definitions, and Product Types

    Skin substitutes are biological or engineered products applied to wounds to facilitate healing by providing a scaffold, covering, or cellular elements that promote re‑epithelialization and tissue regeneration. They are derived from human, animal, or synthetic sources and are used across wound care, burns, breast reconstruction, and ophthalmologic surface applications; they do not replace autologous skin grafts in all contexts and selection depends on indication and evidence.

    dHACM definition (example: EpiFix)
    dHACM definitionDehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane allograft (example: EpiFix) used in wound repair and reconstruction
    Typical useApplied topically as an allograft for chronic wounds and some reconstructive applications
    Evidence notedHACM has RCTs and observational studies for DFU/VLU but study designs vary
    Application (episode) definition — frequency and episode concepts

    Evidence Summaries, Reviews, and Clinical Rationale

    The policy’s product‑level evidence summaries categorize many products as having no literature identified, few published studies, or insufficient evidence for specific indications (examples shown in the Mohs surgery evidence tables). These per‑product statements inform coverage decisions: products with inadequate peer‑reviewed evidence for an indicated use are typically designated investigational for that use unless a specific coverage criterion exists.

    Selected literature excerpts list randomized controlled trials, observational cohorts, and systematic reviews without an accompanying explicit coverage decision in those excerpts. These citation‑only sections are retained to document the evidence base and are referenced by the policy’s evidence summaries and coverage determinations elsewhere.

    A number of technologies and indications have limited or mixed evidence. For example, ReCell for deep dermal burns has RCTs with heterogeneous populations and outcomes and is described as having insufficient evidence to conclude improved net health outcome; human amniotic membrane (HAM) for corneal perforation lacks RCT data but may be considered in select temporizing situations; OrCel for EB has case‑series evidence only and remains limited to HDE‑specified uses.

    Multiple specific products are described as having insufficient evidence for various indications. Examples cited in the product listings include OrCel (limited to HDE indications with case series evidence) and ReCell (deep dermal burn evidence judged insufficient to establish net benefit), which supports the policy’s investigational/not medically necessary designations for uses beyond narrowly defined indications.

    The evidence citations include randomized trials and systematic reviews for chronic wounds and burns (for example, trials of EpiFix for venous leg ulcers and Integra for burns) and cohort and retrospective studies for other products. These summarized citations underpin the policy’s distinction between products and indications supported by RCT evidence and those lacking high‑quality evidence.

    Policy Revision History

    2025-12-26interim_updateLatest

    Policy statement updated to include ophthalmic indications and other amniotic product limitations; summary of evidence reformatted to include ophthalmic and other conditions.

    2025-10-17interim_update

    Updated CMS-related documents and the status for multiple product codes; reorganized clinical inclusion criteria wording, changed provider qualifications to provider scope of practice, and reformatted code tables and template language.

    2025-04-11
    Policy Summary
    Payerblue cross blue shield - michigan
    PolicySkin and tissue substitutes (bioengineered skin and amniotic products)
    Policy CodePolicy N/A
    Change TypeMaterial updates: ophthalmic indications addedDFU/VLU criteria/coding removed and routed to LCD
    Effective DateDec 26, 2025
    Next Review DateN/A
    Key ActionDocument prior trial of standard of care (minimum 4 weeks, with ≤50% ulcer area reduction) and submit product HCPCS, CPT application code, and applicable ICD-10 with claims.
    SourceLink
    On This Page
    Coverage Criteria and Medical NecessityCoding, Billing Codes, and ThresholdsProvider Actions, Prior Authorization, and DocumentationBackground, Definitions, and Product TypesEvidence Summaries, Reviews, and Clinical RationalePolicy Revision History
    Moderate or severe Stevens‑Johnson syndrome.
    Persistent epithelial defects that do not respond within 2 days to conservative therapy.
    Severe dry eye (DEWS 3 or 4) with ocular surface damage and inflammation that remains symptomatic after Steps 1–3 of dry eye management algorithms.
    Moderate or severe acute ocular chemical burn.
    For ophthalmologic indications: documentation that conservative therapy was attempted and failed where the indication requires prior conservative therapy.
    Use of skin substitutes on infected, ischemic, or necrotic wound beds, or wounds with exposed bone, tendon, or fascia is not reasonable and necessary.
    Use in patients with uncontrolled underlying conditions (e.g., HbA1c > 12%) is not considered reasonable and necessary.
    Multiple applications beyond established limits: more than four applications within a 12‑week episode is not reasonable and necessary except in exceptional documented cases subject to Medical Director review (maximum total not to exceed eight applications).
    Extended application beyond 12 weeks per episode is not reasonable and necessary except as above.
    Reapplication after failed prior application (no improvement, increased size/depth, or recurrence within 12 months) is not reasonable and necessary.
    • Claims with listed non‑covered product codes will be denied.
    • Providers must notify members in advance when a service is not covered.
    Prior Authorization

    PA must document SOC failure (4–6 weeks) and wound characteristics

    Prior authorization requests for skin substitutes should document failure of standard of care for the required trial period (typically 4–6 weeks or a minimum of 1 month for DFU/VLU), and detail wound characteristics including no active infection/necrosis, absence of exposed tendon/muscle/bone, and evidence of adequate perfusion (palpable pedal pulse or ABI > 0.70).

    • Document >=4–6 weeks (or minimum 1 month) of SOC with compliance and <50% ulcer area reduction where applicable.
    • Document wound bed free of infection, eschar, tunnels, or exposed deep structures.
    • Provide arterial perfusion evidence (palpable pedal pulse or ABI > 0.70).
    Prior Authorization

    PA may be required for branded products; include product/regulatory status

    For specific branded tissue substitutes (including products with differing FDA regulatory statuses such as 361 HCT/P, PMA, 510(k), or HDE), prior authorization may be required by the plan and should include product identity and regulatory status to demonstrate indication‑specific medical necessity.

    • Include branded product name and relevant FDA regulatory status in request (e.g., 361 HCT/P, PMA, HDE).
    • For HDE products, include documentation showing use aligns with FDA‑labeled HDE indication.
    Prior Authorization

    PA must include indication‑specific documentation (burn extent, donor‑site limits, ophthalmic SOC failure)

    Prior authorization for skin substitutes and human amniotic membrane (HAM) must demonstrate indication‑specific criteria — e.g., for Epicel/Integra in burns document burn depth and % TBSA and donor‑site limitations; for ophthalmic HAM document failed conservative therapy and the specific ophthalmic indication.

    • Burns: document debridement, burn depth, % TBSA treated, prior donor skin availability/limitations.
    • Ophthalmic HAM: document prior Steps 1–3 conservative therapies and indication (e.g., neurotrophic keratitis, persistent epithelial defect).
    Note

    Musculoskeletal uses: follow applicable MAC LCD for PA and documentation

    For musculoskeletal injections or applications of amniotic/placental‑derived products, prior authorization coverage and documentation requirements defer to the applicable MAC Local Coverage Determination (LCD) rather than this policy.

    • Refer to the appropriate MAC LCD for amniotic and placental‑derived product injections/applications for musculoskeletal indications.
    Prior Authorization

    Consider PA for anticipated multiple applications; document frequency and rationale

    When multiple applications are anticipated, prior authorization is reasonable; requests should include prior wound status, comorbidities, and the planned number/timing/rationale for reapplications given variable evidence on optimal frequency.

    • Document number, timing, and clinical rationale for each anticipated reapplication.
    • Note policy default: no more than four applications in a 12‑week episode; exceptional requests require Plan Medical Director review (up to 8).
    Documentation Required

    Document medical necessity and submit required claim elements for breast reconstruction products

    For breast reconstruction products, document medical necessity per listed surgical criteria and include the skin substitute HCPCS product code, a CPT application code (e.g., 15777 when applicable), and the applicable ICD‑10 diagnosis on the claim; Q4100 use requires product‑level details in the claim narrative.

    • Include HCPCS product code (e.g., Q4116, Q4122, Q4128), CPT application code documentation, and appropriate ICD‑10 (C50.x, Z85.3).
    • If billing Q4100, report product name, package size purchased, amount applied and amount wasted in claim narrative.
    Billing Rule

    Bill CPT application codes (15271–15278) in addition to product/procedure

    When billing for application of a skin substitute graft, include the CPT application codes 15271–15278 (or C5271–C5278 for low‑cost grafts) in addition to the primary procedure as applicable; these codes specify wound surface area bands and locations.

    • Use 15271–15278 for standard application reporting (first 25 sq cm, additional 25 sq cm, first 100 sq cm, additional 100 sq cm, face/hands/feet location variants).
    • Low‑cost CPT equivalents C5271–C5278 apply where appropriate.
    Billing Rule

    Include HCPCS product code, CPT application code, and ICD‑10 on claims (Q4100 requires extra details)

    Claims must include the skin substitute HCPCS product code, the CPT application code, and an applicable ICD‑10 diagnosis; for Q4100 submissions, the claim narrative must also report product name, package size purchased, amount applied, and amount wasted to avoid claim return or rejection.

    • Required claim elements: HCPCS product code + CPT application code + appropriate ICD‑10 (including L97 where dual diagnosis required).
    • For Q4100, include product name, package size, amount applied and wasted in the claim narrative/remarks.
    Denial Risk

    Investigational product listings imply PA and denial risk — verify coverage before use

    Products and Q‑codes identified in the policy as investigational (many listed Q‑codes) imply prior authorization/coverage denial risk; providers should verify coverage and PA requirements before using such investigational products.

    • Many Q‑codes are designated investigational; use of these products may not meet medical necessity and may be denied.
    • Prior authorization should be confirmed prior to use of investigational‑listed products.
    Note

    Policies are not authorizations — follow BCBSM reimbursement and provider manual for PA/claims

    Medical policies do not replace payer authorization rules; providers must follow BCBSM/BCN reimbursement policies and the provider manual for prior authorization and claim submission requirements, and may need to submit supporting medical records when requested.

    • Review BCBSM reimbursement policies and provider manual prior to claim submission.
    • Be prepared to submit medical records to support non‑routine claims, especially for non‑contracted providers.
    Note

    Literature excerpts do not establish prior authorization requirements

    Some document excerpts list only literature and trials without specifying prior authorization requirements; do not assume PA requirements from bibliographic sections — rely on the policy's PA statements and payer rules.

    • Literature‑only sections do not establish PA rules.
    • Confirm PA requirements in the policy PA section or payer/provider manual.
    Note
    Prior Authorization

    DFU/VLU claims and PA routing follow applicable MAC LCD (internal criteria removed)

    Claims for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and venous leg ulcers (VLU) should follow the applicable MAC Local Coverage Determination; the policy removed internal DFU/VLU clinical criteria and coding and redirects providers to the applicable LCD for PA and coverage rules.

    • Internal DFU/VLU clinical criteria and coding were removed and readers are referred to the appropriate MAC LCD.
    • Follow the MAC LCD for PA and claims routing for DFU and VLU.
    Step Therapy

    Document escalation through Steps 1–3 of conservative ophthalmic therapy before HAM for certain indications

    For ophthalmic HAM uses the policy requires documentation of escalation through dry eye/dry‑eye disease management Steps 1–3 (education, lubricants and lid hygiene, then advanced topical/systemic/contact‑lens measures) before certain amniotic membrane applications are considered medically necessary.

    • Document Step 1–3 treatments and failure where required (e.g., DEWS 3–4 severe dry eye).
    • Persistent epithelial defects and other listed ophthalmic indications require prior conservative therapy per the policy.
    Step Therapy

    Step therapy: require documented SOC (debridement, infection control, offloading/compression) before skin substitutes

    The policy outlines a stepwise approach: advance to skin substitutes only after appropriate SOC therapies (debridement, infection control, offloading/compression, moisture balance, nutrition, and systemic disease control) have been attempted and documented.

    • Document SOC measures and duration of nonresponse (typically 4–6 weeks).
    • Provide evidence of optimization of underlying factors (e.g., glycemic control, nutrition).
    Step Therapy

    Conservative therapy must be documented failed before HAM for listed ophthalmic indications

    Prior to HAM use for several ophthalmic indications (neurotrophic keratitis, corneal ulcers/melts, LSCD, SJS, persistent epithelial defects, severe dry eye), providers must document failure of conservative/medical therapy as specified in the policy.

    • Show prior use and failure of topical lubricants, antibiotics, therapeutic contact lenses, patching, and other conservative modalities.
    • Document indication‑specific findings (e.g., epithelial defect status, DEWS score).
    Step Therapy

    For pterygium repair, document insufficiency of conjunctival autograft before HAM

    When considering alternatives to conjunctival autograft for pterygium repair, providers must document that a conjunctival autograft is not possible (insufficient healthy donor conjunctiva) to support use of HAM under the policy criteria.

    • Document insufficiency of healthy donor conjunctiva to justify HAM as the alternative.
    • Include evidence supporting selection criteria for pterygium repair alternative.
    Step Therapy

    Step therapy consideration: may require trial of better‑studied alternatives or SOC before repeated/less‑studied product use

    Before authorizing repeated applications of newer or less‑studied products, payers may require a trial of better‑studied alternatives or documented prior SOC due to variable evidence; include prior therapy and rationale for repeat applications in the PA.

    • Provide prior SOC documentation and justification for choosing the specific product for repeated applications.
    • Highlight any RCT or comparative evidence supporting the selected product if available.
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Documentation Required

    Required clinical documentation: disease, prior SOC, wound/ocular characteristics, and perfusion status

    Providers must document underlying disease details (e.g., diabetes type and management), prior SOC treatments and compliance, wound characteristics (size, depth, infection status, exposed structures), and evidence of adequate arterial perfusion; for ophthalmic uses include prior conservative treatments and objective ocular findings.

    • For ulcers: wound size (>=1.0 cm2 where required), depth, ABI or palpable pulses, SOC trial duration/outcomes.
    • For ophthalmic: list prior Steps 1–3 therapies and relevant exam findings (epithelial defect, DEWS score).
    Documentation Required

    HDE‑specific documentation required when using HDE products (document HDE‑consistent use, IRB where required)

    When HDE‑designated products (e.g., Epicel, OrCel) are used, document that use is consistent with HDE labeling and, where required, include institutional review board (IRB) approval or other HDE‑specific documentation.

    • Confirm use aligns with FDA‑labeled HDE indication.
    • Retain IRB approval or HDE documentation as required.
    Documentation Required

    Document wound progress and expected benefit for exceptions to application limits (Plan Medical Director review required)

    For exceptions beyond standard application limits (e.g., more than four applications in 12 weeks or up to 8 with review), document wound closure progress and expected benefit; Plan Medical Director review is required for exceptional extensions.

    • Provide objective measures of wound progress and rationale for exceeding default application limits.
    • Note that exceptional approvals do not exceed 8 total applications and require Plan Medical Director review.
    Billing Rule

    HCPCS Q4100 reporting: include product name, package size, amount applied and wasted

    When reporting HCPCS Q4100 (skin substitute, not otherwise specified), include the product name, package size purchased, amount applied, and amount wasted in the claim narrative/remarks; failure to include these details may cause the claim to be returned or rejected.

    • Include product name, package size, amount applied and amount wasted in the claim narrative when using Q4100.
    • Claims missing required Q4100 details may be returned or rejected.
    Denial Risk

    Denial risk when product lacks product‑specific high‑certainty evidence or is listed investigational

    Products lacking high‑certainty, product‑specific peer‑reviewed evidence or those listed as experimental/investigational in the policy are at risk for denial; providers should submit supportive literature and justification when requesting coverage for such products.

    • Products with designations like 'No literature identified' or 'Insufficient evidence' are vulnerable to denial.
    • Include peer‑reviewed evidence demonstrating product‑specific benefit when available.
    Denial Risk

    Denial risk if minimum SOC trial and ulcer response (<50% reduction in 4 weeks) not documented

    Failure to document the required SOC trial for DFU/VLU (minimum 4 weeks with documented compliance and <50% ulcer area reduction) and relevant comorbidity optimization (e.g., HbA1c) may trigger denial of skin substitute coverage.

    • Document SOC trial length, compliance, and ulcer area change (>=50% threshold for nonresponse).
    • Ensure underlying conditions (e.g., glycemic control) are optimized; HbA1c >12% is cited as making skin substitute use not reasonable and necessary.
    Denial Risk

    Claims with policy non‑covered product codes will be denied — notify members in advance

    Claims submitted with listed non‑covered product codes (policy non‑covered/ investigational code lists) will be denied; providers must notify members in advance when services are not covered under the member's benefit plan.

    • Review the policy's non‑covered product code lists before service provision.
    • Provide member notice if the service is not covered to avoid provider financial liability.
    Denial Risk

    Denial triggers: infected/ischemic/necrotic wound beds or inadequate perfusion (ABI ≤ 0.70)

    Application of skin substitutes is inappropriate and may result in denial if the wound is infected, ischemic, necrotic, exposes deep structures (tendon/bone), or lacks adequate perfusion (ABI ≤ 0.70 or nonpalpable pedal pulse); these conditions must be corrected or documented as controlled prior to application.

    • Do not apply skin substitutes to infected, ischemic, or necrotic wound beds.
    • Document correction of ischemia or evidence of adequate perfusion (palpable pulses or ABI > 0.70).
    Denial Risk

    HCT/P regulatory compliance required — non‑361 products risk non‑coverage/regulatory denial

    If an HCT/P product does not meet FDA 361 criteria (minimally manipulated, homologous use, limited combination, and limited systemic/metabolic activity), it is treated as a drug/device/biologic requiring premarket review; using such products outside the FDA pathway risks non‑coverage or regulatory denial.

    • Confirm HCT/P meets 361 criteria or otherwise acknowledge the need for appropriate regulatory clearance.
    • Non‑361 products may be treated as drugs/devices/biologics and are subject to different coverage/regulatory requirements.
    Denial Risk

    HDE/IRB and unapproved product risks — document approvals and follow FDA labeling

    Use of HUD/HDE products may require institutional review board (IRB) approval and documentation; unapproved regenerative medicine products (e.g., marketed amniotic fluid eyedrops without premarket review) carry regulatory and denial risks and should be used per FDA labeling and institutional approvals.

    • Document IRB approval and HDE compliance when using HUD/HDE devices (e.g., Epicel, OrCel).
    • Avoid use of marketed unapproved regenerative products lacking FDA premarket review.
    Denial Risk

    ReCell for deep dermal burns: insufficient evidence — coverage requests at denial risk without stronger RCT data

    ReCell and similar products for deep dermal burns are identified as having insufficient evidence to determine net health outcome improvement; requests relying principally on ReCell without stronger RCT support may be denied.

    • Provide additional high‑quality evidence when requesting coverage for ReCell in deep dermal burn indications.
    • Recognize that current evidence is insufficient for routine coverage in certain burn populations.
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Note
    Application (episode) definition
    An instance of placing an amniotic or biologic wound product on a wound; episodes aggregate multiple applications over time
    Frequency variabilityApplication schedules vary by product labeling and provider discretion (weekly, biweekly, or as needed)
    Counting for limitsAll applications from all products/providers within the 12‑week episode are combined when enforcing application limits
    Skin substitute grafts (CPT definition)
    Skin substitute grafts (CPT) definitionNon‑autologous skin grafts (dermal or epidermal, cellular or acellular) and bio‑engineered sheet scaffolds; excludes non‑graft dressings, injectables, liquids, gels
    CPT application codesApplication CPT codes (15271–15278) are billed in addition to primary procedure for graft application
    Billing implicationUse CPT application codes with appropriate HCPCS product code and ICD‑10 diagnosis
    CAMP/CTP definition
    CAMP/CTP definitionCellular, acellular and matrix‑like products (CTPs/CAMPs) used as scaffolds to support cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and neovascularization
    Alternate termAlso referred to as cellular/tissue products (CTPs) or CAMPs in consensus documents
    Clinical roleUsed as adjuncts to standard of care for chronic wounds after SOC failure
    Dual diagnosis requirement — when additional L97 code required
    Dual diagnosis requirement — diabetesWhen reporting certain diabetes ulcer codes (E08.621 etc.), report an L97.xx code to identify ulcer site/severity
    Dual diagnosis requirement — venousWhen reporting I83.xxx or I87.xxx venous codes, one of the listed L97.xx chronic ulcer codes must also be reported
    PurposeEnsures site and severity of chronic ulcer are specified on claims
    Dual diagnosis requirement (venous codes must be accompanied by L97.xx)
    Venous dual diagnosis ruleI83.XXX or I87.XXX codes for venous disease must be accompanied by an L97.xx code identifying ulcer site and severity
    Example L97 codesL97.222, L97.311, L97.412, L97.521, etc. (see policy tables)
    Claim requirementDual reporting required to support medical necessity for venous ulcer treatment
    Investigational definition as used in policy
    Investigational definitionProducts labeled investigational in this policy lack sufficient peer‑reviewed evidence to support clinical effectiveness and are considered experimental/not medically necessary
    ImplicationClaims for listed investigational products/Q‑codes will be denied as not medically necessary
    ScopeIncludes many Q‑codes, A‑codes and other listed product mappings in the policy
    Investigational product HCPCS/Q-code definition in this section
    Investigational product HCPCS/Q‑code definitionHCPCS Q‑codes and other product codes mapped in the investigational sections denote products considered experimental due to insufficient evidence
    Provider actionVerify coverage and prior authorization before use; listed Q‑codes often result in denial
    List locationSee coding modules for full investigational Q‑code mappings
    CAMP definition (cellular, acellular, matrix-like products)
    CAMP composition definitionCAMPs include cellular, acellular, and matrix‑like products that provide scaffolds and may contain living cells, growth factors, or extracellular matrix components
    ExamplesHuman‑derived skin allografts, amniotic membrane products, acellular dermal matrices, bilayer constructs
    Clinical noteProduct heterogeneity necessitates product‑specific evidence review
    Acellular dermal matrix/allograft definition
    Acellular dermal matrix/allograft definitionBiologic grafts processed to remove donor cells, providing a collagen‑rich scaffold to promote host cell and vessel ingrowth
    Common usesChronic wounds, soft‑tissue reconstruction, breast reconstruction adjuncts
    Regulatory/evidence noteOften shelf‑stable; evidence base varies by product and indication
    Amniotic/placental membrane allografts definition
    Amniotic/placental membrane allografts definitionCryopreserved or dehydrated placental‑derived products (amnion/chorion/umbilical cord) applied topically to chronic wounds and ocular surfaces
    FormsSutured, glued, self‑retained rings (e.g., ProKera), or graft membranes
    Clinical roleUsed for wound healing, ocular surface disorders, and selected reconstructive uses per indication criteria
    Bioengineered skin substitutes definition (Apligraf, Dermagraft examples)
    Bioengineered skin substitutes definitionCellular or bilayer constructs (e.g., Apligraf, Dermagraft) composed of living cells and a matrix designed to promote re‑epithelialization and dermal regeneration
    Typical indicationsChronic ulcers and burns where RCTs have evaluated comparative healing vs SOC
    Regulatory noteSome have PMA or other FDA regulatory statuses depending on product
    Aggregate definition for skin/tissue products (amniotic membrane, ADM)
    Aggregate definition for skin/tissue productsIncludes amniotic membrane, acellular dermal matrices, cellular skin substitutes and other biologic/synthetic scaffolds grouped as skin/tissue products for policy purposes
    Policy implicationEach product/class requires product‑specific evidence assessment for coverage determination
    Examples includeddHACM (EpiFix), ADMs (AlloDerm/DermaCell), bioengineered constructs (Apligraf, Dermagraft)

    Bibliographic excerpts list peer‑reviewed studies, trial identifiers, and systematic reviews relevant to diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, burns, and ophthalmic indications; these references are provided to support the policy’s evidence evaluations.

    Application frequency and episode‑level use are poorly standardized in the literature; as a result, the policy documents variable application frequencies reported in observational series and registry data and uses these findings when setting pragmatic application limits in coverage criteria.

    Evidence on number and timing of applications varies by product and study; the policy references reported medians and averages from clinical series to inform recommended application ceilings and exceptional review processes.

    Randomized trials and comparative studies in venous leg ulcers are cited to document efficacy signals for selected products when used as adjuncts to standard care; however, overall evidence quality is variable and outcomes depend on study design and follow‑up duration.

    Burn literature citations include randomized pediatric and adult trials and multicenter post‑approval studies (for example, Integra and Epicel) that support coverage for specific burn indications when policy criteria are met and products are used following labeled or HDE specifications.

    The policy excerpts note that several guidelines and trials do not specify prior authorization or step‑therapy requirements explicitly; therefore, the policy itself focuses on clinical criteria and documentation expectations rather than universal PA mandates.

    The citation lists and evidence tables do not include explicit step‑therapy sequencing or universal prior‑authorization mandates; local plan processes may require PA based on product cost, frequency, or investigational status.

    interim_update

    Reverted to the 09/18/2024 policy content with updated foundational language due to delays in CMS LCD implementation for DFU and VLU.

    2025-02-12interim_update

    Internal clinical coverage criteria and coding for diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) and venous leg ulcers (VLU) were removed and readers referred to the applicable MAC Local Coverage Determination; related DFU/VLU coding and clinical evidence were removed from the policy.

    2024-09-18interim_update

    Interim update moved specific product codes between 'may be medically necessary' lists for burns and breast reconstruction and corrected coding listings.

    2024-07-17established

    Medicare Advantage version of the policy established by the Utilization Management Committee.