Comprehensive Genomic Profiling for Selecting Targeted Cancer Therapies
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for all blue cross blue shield - kansas policy alerts
Know when blue cross blue shield - kansas releases new policies or updates existing guidance.
Monitor payer policy activity
Policy governs coverage of comprehensive genomic profiling (expanded tumor genomic panels) to guide targeted therapy selection for individuals with advanced or recurrent cancer; applies to Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas members.
Section A1 changed the language to require that the individual has not previously had a genomic sequencing procedure using the same assay to investigate the same kind of alteration in the same genomic location.
Section A5 clarified that the genomic sequencing procedure must have FDA approval or be a validated diagnostic laboratory test performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory.
Gastroesophageal Cancer was added to the list of cancer types in Section A3.
Multiple new PLA/unique CPT codes (e.g., 0379U, 0391U, 0409U, 0473U, 0543U) were added to the coding section across updates.
Coverage criteria for comprehensive genomic profiling
Medically necessary — Comprehensive genomic profiling
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
All conditions must be satisfied for coverage.
Evidence-based criteria and considerations
Clinical utility and validity considerations for comprehensive genomic profiling
From PICO and populations
Defines scope of tests considered
Per-variant evidence required
RCT evidence is necessary to demonstrate net health outcome improvement
Observational evidence supports targeted approaches but not broad panel advantage
Evidence-based coverage considerations
Summary statements from evidence and guidelines relevant to coverage decisions:
See SHIVA and systematic reviews.
See ASCO and NCCN guidance.
Study design limitations reduce generalizability.
Initial coverage criteria (Section A)
Covered when ALL of the following are met
Exact section language summarized from policy A (see coding/revision history).
The policy states that the use of comprehensive genomic profiling panels is considered experimental/investigational when the medical necessity criteria in Policy A are not met. This means coverage is limited to cases that satisfy all listed conditions (see Policy A); testing that does not meet those requirements is treated as investigational and not covered.
The document notes that panel-level clinical validity is not established. Because expanded panels include hundreds of variants across many cancer types, the clinical validity of a panel as a whole cannot be determined; validity must be demonstrated for specific variant–tumor pairings rather than for the entire panel.
Evidence summaries conclude that the clinical utility of expanded molecular panels to direct targeted cancer treatment has not been demonstrated compared with limited, tumor-specific testing. While trials and nonrandomized studies show benefit when therapy is matched to specific variants, randomized data using broad panels (eg, the SHIVA trial) did not show a PFS advantage, and therefore routine use of broad profiling to guide targeted therapy remains of unproven utility.
One of the Policy A requirements explicitly excludes individuals who have already undergone the same genomic interrogation: coverage requires that the individual has not previously had a genomic sequencing procedure using the same assay to investigate the same kind of alteration in the same genomic location. Prior identical testing with the same assay for the same target therefore precludes coverage under the policy.
Within the referenced sections and committee notes, no additional explicit exclusions (beyond the policy criteria and prior-testing restriction) are listed. The document states that no other explicit exclusions appear in these sections.
Indications covered by this policy
Individuals with recurrent, relapsed, refractory, metastatic, or advanced (stage III/IV) solid tumors of specified types being considered for targeted therapy; purpose is to identify somatic variants in tumor tissue to guide targeted treatment decisions.
Covered indications for comprehensive genomic profiling — key clinical scenarios where testing is intended to inform targeted treatment or trial enrollment:
Policy focuses on somatic tumor profiling rather than germline testing; see clinical context.
Identification of somatic tumor variants to guide targeted therapy in individuals with advanced cancer who have not previously received targeted therapy.
Clinical context and population for intended use:
From PICO/populations in evidence review.
Metastatic or advanced solid tumors when patients are candidates for genomic biomarker–linked therapies approved by regulatory agencies, or when biomarker status (dMMR/MSI, TMB) influences immunotherapy decisions.
When multigene testing is recommended by professional societies:
ASCO provisional opinion supports these scenarios; NCCN lists tumor-specific gene panels.
Recurrent, relapsed, refractory, metastatic, or advanced stage III/IV cancer of specified tumor types (breast, colorectal, melanoma, non-small cell lung, ovarian, pancreatic, prostate, gastroesophageal).
Covered cancer types under Policy A (applicability requires meeting all Section A criteria):
Patient must be considering further treatment and not have prior same-assay sequencing of the same alteration/location; assay must be FDA-approved or CLIA-validated.
Use of somatic genomic testing/CGP in metastatic or advanced cancer to direct targeted therapy selection or enrollment in precision oncology trials
Intended uses for directing therapy or clinical trial enrollment:
Supported by multiple precision-medicine studies and ASCO provisional opinion; documentation of actionable variants and their use in management is expected.
Coding and billing codes
| No codes listed |
| 81445 | Solid organ neoplasm, genomic sequence analysis panel 5-50 genes, DNA analysis or combined DNA and RNA analysis. |
| 81449 | Solid organ neoplasm, genomic sequence analysis panel, 5-50 genes, RNA analysis. |
| 81450 | Hematolymphoid neoplasm, genomic sequence analysis panel, 5-50 genes, DNA analysis or combined DNA and RNA analysis. |
| 81451 | Hematolymphoid neoplasm, genomic sequence analysis panel, 5-50 genes, RNA analysis. |
| 81455 | Solid organ or hematolymphoid neoplasm, 51 or greater genes, DNA analysis or combined DNA and RNA analysis. |
| 81456 | Solid organ or hematolymphoid neoplasm, 51 or greater genes, RNA analysis. |
| 88342 | Immunohistochemistry or immunocytochemistry, per specimen; initial single antibody stain procedure. |
| 88381 | Microdissection (sample preparation of microscopically identified target); manual. |
| 0019U | Oncology, RNA, gene expression by whole transcriptome sequencing, FFPE or fresh frozen tissue, predictive algorithm reported as potential targets. |
| 0022U | Targeted genomic sequence analysis panel, non-small cell lung neoplasia, DNA and RNA analysis, 23 genes. |
| 0036U | Exome (somatic mutations); paired FFPE tumor tissue and normal specimen, sequence analyses. |
| 0037U | Targeted genomic sequence analysis, solid organ neoplasm, DNA analysis of 324 genes (FoundationOne CDx PLA). |
| 0048U | Oncology (solid organ neoplasia), DNA, targeted sequencing of 468 cancer-associated genes (MSK-IMPACT). |
| 0101U | Hereditary colon cancer disorders, genomic sequence analysis panel (ColoNext). |
| 0102U | Hereditary breast cancer-related disorders, genomic sequence analysis panel (BreastNext). |
| 0103U | Hereditary ovarian cancer panel (OvaNext). |
| 0111U | Oncology (colon), targeted KRAS and NRAS gene analysis (Praxis Extended RAS Panel). |
| 0174U | Oncology (solid tumor), mass spectrometric 30-protein targets, prognostic/predictive algorithm (OncoOnimisDx). |
Provider requirements, prior authorization, and documentation
Prior authorization / Medical necessity verification — Prior authorization required when medical necessity criteria must be verified before coverage
Prior authorization may be required when medical necessity must be verified before coverage. The policy's medical necessity criteria require that the individual has not previously had a genomic sequencing procedure using the same assay to investigate the same kind of alteration in the same genomic location; has recurrent, relapsed, refractory, metastatic, or advanced stage III/IV cancer; has one of the listed cancer types; has decided to seek further treatment; and that the sequencing procedure is FDA-approved or a validated diagnostic test performed in a CLIA-certified laboratory.
- Prior authorizationrecommended when medical necessity verification is required
- Medically necessary criteria must be documented (see policy A1–A5)
- Tests must be FDA-approved or CLIA-validated diagnostic laboratory tests
Confirm clinical validity for indicated variant–tumor pairings
Prior authorization should confirm the test is intended to detect somatic tumor variants (SNVs, indels, CNVs, fusions, with optional MSI and TMB) and is clinically appropriate for the tumor/variant pairing being investigated. The evidence base indicates clinical validity is variant- and tumor-specific; ensure the requested assay reports the relevant variants for the indicated cancer type.
- Assay scope: SNVs, indels, CNVs, fusions; may include MSI and TMB
- Confirm assay reports the variant/tumor pairing relevant to treatment decisions
Prior authorization recommendation — When testing is performed to identify biomarker-linked therapies that are regulatory-agency approved or to inform use of tumor-agnostic therapies
When testing is performed to identify biomarker-linked therapies that are regulatory-agency approved or to inform use of tumor-agnostic treatments, prior authorization is recommended to verify that testing aligns with guideline recommendations (eg, ASCO, NCCN) and that results will inform an approved therapy or appropriate clinical decision.
- Use multigene testing when patients are eligible for regulatory-approved biomarker-linked therapies
- Consider multigene panels when multiple biomarkers could affect therapy choice
PA requirement for listed genomic assay codes — Prior authorization may be required for comprehensive genomic profiling/targeted genomic sequence assays identified by the CPT/PLA codes
Prior authorization may be required for comprehensive genomic profiling assays identified by CPT/PLA codes listed in the Coding section. Confirm payer-specific code-level requirements and effective dates when submitting authorizations.
- Verify coverage/PA requirements for specific CPT/PLA/HCPCS codes prior to billing
- Refer to most recent coding updates for effective dates and added codes
Prior authorization — No explicit prior authorization requirements are specified in these sections.
No explicit prior authorization process, step therapy requirements, or detailed documentation checklist is provided in the policy text. Providers should follow payer-specific administrative procedures and local prior authorization portals for submission requirements.
- No explicit step therapy program is described in this policy
- No explicit denial triggers are listed in the policy text beyond failure to meet medical necessity criteria
- No comprehensive documentation checklist is provided in the policy; document clinical indication, prior testing history (same assay/alteration/location), tumor stage/status, and that the test is FDA-approved or CLIA-validated
Denial triggers — Failure to meet the medical necessity criteria (see Policy A)
Providers should be aware that denials may result if the medical necessity criteria are not met (for example, prior identical genomic sequencing using the same assay for the same alteration/location) even though the policy does not list an explicit denial triggers section. To reduce denial risk, include documentation showing the assay has not been previously used for the same alteration/location and that the patient meets the policy clinical criteria.
- Potential denial rationale: clinical utility not demonstrated for expanded panels when criteria not met
- Denial risk if prior same-assay sequencing for same alteration/location is documented
Required documentation — Document that the individual has not previously had genomic sequencing with the same assay for the same genomic location, has recurrent/advanced disease, and that the assay is FDA-approved or CLIA-validated
Documentation supporting authorization requests should include sufficient clinical information even though the policy does not provide a formal checklist. At minimum, submit: cancer diagnosis and stage, prior treatment history, intent to pursue further treatment, prior genomic testing history (including assay and genomic locations tested), and laboratory validation (FDA approval or CLIA certification).
- Minimum recommended documentation: diagnosis/stage, treatment plan, prior testing history (same assay/alteration/location), assay regulatory/validation status
- Include genomic profiling results when available (identified actionable alterations and genes tested) to support medical necessity
Single-gene testing alternative — Consideration of single-gene testing versus comprehensive profiling is relevant
Consider whether single-gene testing is appropriate per tumor-specific guidelines before authorizing broad panels when guideline-directed single-gene tests exist (eg, EGFR/ALK/ROS1 in NSCLC). The policy recognizes single-gene testing as a current comparator practice.
- Order single-gene tests first when guideline recommendations specify them for the tumor type
- If multiple biomarkers are relevant or tumor-agnostic therapy is considered, multigene panels may be preferred
Situations not covered by this policy
The policy focuses on comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), which tests a large number of somatic tumor markers to identify potential targeted therapies. It distinguishes CGP and expanded panels from single-gene tests or small tumor-specific panels, and notes that single-gene or focused panels with established clinical utility are addressed in other policies rather than in this coverage statement.
The policy indicates that claims that an expanded panel has clinical validity as a whole for many cancers are unsupported. Because expanded panels include many variants across diverse tumor types, clinical validity must be established for each specific variant–tumor pairing rather than for panel-level claims, and broad panel-level validity is not established.
The routine use of expanded molecular panels to direct targeted therapy is considered not covered when it is not tied to guideline-recommended or regulatory-approved biomarker–linked treatments. Randomized evidence (for example, the SHIVA trial) did not show benefit for off-label targeted therapy based on broad profiling in a refractory population, supporting the exclusion of routine, untargeted use of large panels outside guideline-supported indications.
Historically, CGP was described as experimental/investigational; the updated policy replaces that blanket statement with defined medically necessary criteria. Aside from the clarified prior-testing restriction and policy criteria, the excerpt does not list other specific test-level exclusions within these sections.
Across the referenced sections, the document does not enumerate additional explicitly excluded tests or indications beyond those captured by the policy criteria and the prior-testing restriction.
Definitions and background information
Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) evaluates large numbers of somatic tumor markers to identify potential targeted therapies. The policy emphasizes that expanded panels may include many variants without established, tumor-specific therapeutic benefit and that clinical validity and utility must be demonstrated for specific variant–tumor pairings. CGP differs from single-gene tests or focused tumor-specific panels, which may have established clinical utility and are handled in separate policies.
Eligibility requirements and related notes
(No top-level eligibility requirements are specified in the inventory for this section.)
(No top-level eligibility requirements are specified in the inventory for this section.)
(No top-level eligibility requirements are specified in the inventory for this section.)
(No top-level eligibility requirements are specified in the inventory for this section.)
(No top-level eligibility requirements are specified in the inventory for this section.)
(No top-level eligibility requirements are specified in the inventory for this section.)
Additional provider-facing notes
Genetic counseling requirements
No explicit pre- or post-test genetic counseling requirements are stated in the policy sections referenced.
- Counseling is not mandated by this policy; follow local practice guidelines as appropriate.
Follow intended-use statements for FDA-cleared tests
Some FDA-cleared tests indicate intended use by 'qualified health care professionals'; ordering clinicians should follow the test's intended-use statements.
- Check the assay's labeling for any restrictions on who may order the test.
Order testing within oncology care when results will guide treatment
Testing should be ordered in the context of advanced/metastatic solid tumors by oncology providers when results will inform selection of regulatory-approved biomarker-linked therapies or when recommended by tumor-specific guidelines.
- Ordering clinician should be managing care for a patient seeking further treatment for advanced/recurrent cancer.
Ordering clinician responsibility
The ordering clinician must be managing the patient’s care and the patient must be seeking further treatment for advanced or recurrent cancer; the policy does not list narrower provider-type requirements in the referenced excerpt.
- Document that the ordering clinician is responsible for the patient’s ongoing cancer care and treatment decisions.
Billing rules and common denial triggers
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.