Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPolicy UpdatesOtorhinolaryngology (ENT)Ambetter Nevada cochlear implant Coverage Update |…
    Ask Trek AI about this page
    CurrentAmbetter NevadaPolicy CP.MP.14

    Cochlear implant and external component replacements

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Ambetter Nevada Policy CP.MP.14 alerts

    Get alerted when Policy CP.MP.14 changes without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Defines medical necessity criteria for replacement of cochlear implants and/or external cochlear implant components for members/enrollees of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation (Ambetter Nevada). Applies to replacement and upgrades of devices and external parts.

    Policy Summary
    PayerAmbetter Nevada
    PolicyCochlear implant and external component replacements
    Policy CodePolicy CP.MP.14
    Change TypeEditorial and coding updates
    Effective Date
    Last ReviewMay 25, 2025
    Next Review Date
    Key ActionDocument device malfunction or irrepairability when claiming replacement, including failure diagnostics, repair attempts, or vendor service notes.
    SourceLink

    OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.

    POLICY UPDATE CHANGES

    Verbiage in I.C. changed to state that the reasonable useful life of a sound processor is not less than five years.

    Added HCPCS code L8614 to coding section during most recent annual review.

    3Primary medically necessary replacement criteria
    >=5Minimum reasonable useful life for a sound processor
    MultipleProcedure and supply codes listed

    Medically Necessary and Not Medically Necessary Replacement Criteria

    Medically necessary replacement

    Replacement of a cochlear implant(s) and/or its external components is considered medically necessary when ANY one of the following is present:

    ANY of the following

    • The existing device(s) is no longer functional and cannot be repaired.

      Includes internal and/or external components.

    • A change in the member/enrollee's condition makes the existing unit(s) inadequate for the hearing-related activities of daily living and improvement is expected with a replacement unit(s).

      Clinical expectation of improvement must be present.

    • Reasonable useful life

      • The existing component has reached the limit of its reasonable useful life.
      • The reasonable useful life of a sound processor is not less than five years.>= 5 years

        Used as minimum benchmark for replacement based on age of processor.

    Not medically necessary / Cosmetic or convenience upgrades

    Replacement or upgrade is considered not medically necessary when requested only for convenience or to upgrade to newer technology while the existing device is properly functioning.

    ALL of the following

    • Existing cochlear implant and/or external components are properly functioning.
    • Requested replacement/upgrade is solely for convenience or to obtain newer technology (no clinical inadequacy).

    Relevant Procedure and Supply Codes

    CPTCPT
    69949Unlisted procedure, inner ear
    HCPCS - Cochlear device and external componentsHCPCS
    L8614Cochlear device, includes all internal and external components
    L8615Headset/headpiece for use with cochlear implant device, replacement
    L8616Microphone for use with cochlear implant device, replacement
    L8617Transmitting coil for use with cochlear implant device, replacement
    L8618Transmitter cable for use with cochlear implant device or auditory osseointegrated device, replacement
    L8619Cochlear implant, external speech processor and controller, integrated system, replacement
    L8621Zinc air battery for use with cochlear implant device and auditory osseointegrated sound processors, replacement, each
    L8622Alkaline battery for use with cochlear implant device, any size, replacement, each
    L8623Lithium ion battery for use with cochlear implant device speech processor, other than ear level, replacement, each
    L8624Lithium ion battery for use with cochlear implant device speech processor, ear level replacement, each
    1–10 of 13
    1/2

    Documentation and Billing Requirements

    Documentation Required

    Document device malfunction or irrepairability

    When submitting a claim for replacement due to a non-functional device, document that the existing device cannot be repaired (for example: failure diagnostics, repair attempts, and vendor service notes).

    • 69949
    • L8614
    • L8617
    • L8627
    Documentation Required

    Document clinical inadequacy and expected improvement

    For replacements based on a change in the member/enrollee’s clinical condition, document how the current device is inadequate for hearing‑related activities of daily living and provide the rationale that replacement is expected to improve function.

    • L8619
    • L8627
    • L8628

    Clinical and Administrative Context

    Cochlear implants are electronic hearing devices that bypass damaged inner-ear hair cells to directly stimulate the auditory nerve via implanted electrodes and an external processor and microphone. The system converts sound to electrical signals that activate the auditory nerve, allowing the brain to interpret those signals as hearing (see device components: microphone, external speech processor, transmitter/receiver/stimulator, and implanted electrodes).

    Replacements of cochlear implants or their external components may be required for several reasons: device failure or malfunction that cannot be repaired (documented diagnostics or vendor service notes should support irrepairability); a change in the member/enrollee's clinical condition that renders the existing unit inadequate for hearing-related activities of daily living and where improvement is expected with replacement; or end of reasonable useful life of a component (for a sound processor this policy specifies a benchmark of not less than five years).

    Bilateral cochlear implantation has been shown in multiple studies to provide improved outcomes on some measures — for example, better speech recognition in noise, improved sentence and word recognition, and advantages in localization for some users — but evidence is mixed across outcome domains. Bilateral implantation also carries important trade-offs: it may produce asynchronous neural stimulation if nerve survival is asymmetric, it doubles the surgical risks compared with a single implant, and it is associated with substantially higher cost.

    Key Terms

    Definitions
    Reasonable useful lifeThe expected lifespan of a device component before replacement is considered reasonable; for a sound processor this policy specifies not less than five years.
    External componentsParts of the cochlear implant system worn outside the body (e.g., speech processor, microphone, transmitter coil, controller, batteries).
    Sound processor lifespan noteThe reasonable useful life of a sound processor is not less than five years (used as the minimum benchmark for replacement based on processor age).

    Policy Changes and Review Notes

    2025-05-25addedLatest

    HCPCS code L8614 (Cochlear device, includes all internal and external components) was added to the coding section during the annual review.

    07/22clarified

    Verbiage in I.C. was changed to state that the reasonable useful life of a sound processor is not less than five years (minor rewording with no clinical significance).

    Scope, Policy Number, and Stats

    Scope & Policy Metadata
    Policy numberCP.MP.14
    SubjectCochlear implant and external component replacements
    StatusCURRENT
    Scope summaryDefines medical necessity criteria for replacement of cochlear implants and/or external cochlear implant components for members/enrollees of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation (Ambetter Nevada). Applies to replacement and upgrades of devices and external parts.
    Reasonable useful life of sound processor>= 5 years
    Policy Summary
    PayerAmbetter Nevada
    PolicyCochlear implant and external component replacements
    Policy CodePolicy CP.MP.14
    Change TypeEditorial and coding updates
    Effective Date
    Last ReviewMay 25, 2025
    Next Review Date
    Key ActionDocument device malfunction or irrepairability when claiming replacement, including failure diagnostics, repair attempts, or vendor service notes.
    SourceLink
    On This Page
    Medically Necessary and Not Medically Necessary Replacement CriteriaRelevant Procedure and Supply CodesDocumentation and Billing RequirementsClinical and Administrative ContextKey TermsPolicy Changes and Review NotesScope, Policy Number, and Stats
    Documentation Required

    Document age of processor for useful life criterion

    When requesting replacement based on reasonable useful life, include the original processor implant or supply date in the record to show the processor has reached at least a five‑year lifespan.

    • L8615
    • L8616
    • L8623
    • L8624