Find policies, billing codes, payers, states, and providers
Macular/Foveal Translocation
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0409 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0409 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
This policy governs the coverage stance for macular/foveal translocation procedures for age-related macular degeneration and other indications for Aetna members and providers.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Criteria
inv-01: Not covered — Experimental/Investigational
Covered when ALL of the following are met:
Policy-level coverage determination
inv-02: Coverage considerations and evidence summary
Policy stance derived from guideline summaries and evidence statements in the document:
Based on systematic review of CPGs (2010-2020) selecting NICE guidance
Outcomes and limitations reported in Oshima et al. and summarized in policy background
Aetna considers macular/foveal translocation experimental and investigational for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and for all other indications because the safety and effectiveness of this procedure has not been established in the medical literature.
Clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews strongly recommend intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy as first-line treatment for advanced, active neovascular AMD; interventions such as limited macular translocation have only weak guideline recommendations and are suggested for use only with special arrangements or in research settings when anti-VEGF is inappropriate or has failed.
Published observational series report that limited macular translocation may improve best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in select patients but have limitations including small sample sizes, retrospective design, unpredictable foveal displacement, and higher complication rates compared with intravitreal anti-VEGF at 5 years.
Because macular/foveal translocation is designated experimental and investigational in this policy, it is not considered to meet criteria for medical necessity for AMD or any other indication; requests for coverage should be evaluated in that context and are routinely not approved on the basis of the policy stance.
Macular translocation is not routinely indicated as first-line treatment for neovascular AMD given the stronger evidence and lower complication rates for intravitreal anti-VEGF. Comparative evidence cited in guideline reviews and case series shows worse long-term visual outcomes and higher surgical complication rates for translocation versus anti-VEGF, supporting its limited role only after standard therapies are deemed unsuitable or unsuccessful.
Coding
| H35.051 - H35.059 | Retinal neovascularization |
| H35.30 - H35.3293 | Age-related macular degeneration |
| No codes listed |
Provider Actions and Authorization
Experimental/Investigational — Denial Risk
Aetna considers macular/foveal translocation experimental and investigational for age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and for all other indications; claims for this procedure are subject to denial.
- Procedures considered experimental/investigational → prior authorization requests would not meet medical necessity and are at high denial risk.
Preferred Therapies Before Surgical Consideration
Anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (anti‑VEGF) intravitreal therapy is the established, guideline-supported first‑line therapy for neovascular (wet) AMD. Surgical translocation has a higher complication rate and worse visual acuity outcomes compared with anti‑VEGF at 5 years in available comparative/observational data, and major guidelines recommend against routine use.
- Preferred first‑line therapy: intravitreal anti‑VEGF agents (e.g., bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept) per contemporary clinical practice guidelines.
- Clinical concern: higher rates of foveal RPE atrophy, CNV recurrence, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, retinal detachment, and diplopia reported after translocation; worse long‑term VA versus anti‑VEGF in some series.
Potential Clinical Justification Concerns and Documentation Expectations
Translocation procedures may be considered only in highly selected situations (for example, large submacular hemorrhage or patients unresponsive to VEGF inhibitors) and generally only with special arrangements or as part of research; routine use is not recommended. Documented clinical justification should address why anti‑VEGF therapy is not appropriate or has failed.
- Guideline-based expectation: strong recommendation for anti‑VEGF first‑line; limited translocation only after documented failure or contraindication to anti‑VEGF.
- Required documentation (recommended): pre‑ and post‑operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), degree of foveal displacement, CNV status (presence/recurrence), and rationale for why standard anti‑VEGF therapy is not suitable.
Step Therapy Expectation
Step‑therapy expectation: intravitreal anti‑VEGF therapy is strongly recommended as first‑line; macular/foveal translocation should be reserved as a later option only after documented failure of, contraindication to, or inability to receive anti‑VEGF therapy.
- Anti‑VEGF must be attempted and documented unless there is a clear contraindication or urgent clinical scenario (e.g., uncontrolled large submacular hemorrhage) that justifies deviation.
- Translocation considered only in select patients and preferably within research settings or special arrangements per guideline recommendations.
Coding / Documentation Note
Coding note: there are no specific CPT or HCPCS codes for macular/foveal translocation. Use appropriate retinal surgery procedure codes if billed; ICD‑10 diagnosis codes commonly associated in documentation include H35.051–H35.059 (retinal neovascularization) and H35.30–H35.3293 (age‑related macular degeneration).
- No dedicated CPT/HCPCS code for macular/foveal translocation — verify coding with billing department.
- ICD‑10 examples to support clinical indication: H35.051–H35.059; H35.30–H35.3293.
Background
Subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration can result in severe, central vision loss. Macular/foveal translocation is a surgical technique developed to move the fovea to a retinal area with healthier retinal pigment epithelium in order to treat subfoveal CNV. Although some case series report short- and medium-term BCVA gains, the procedure carries significant surgical risks (for example, retinal detachment, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, diplopia, cataract, and CNV recurrence) and long-term outcomes are inconsistent, which underlies the policy’s experimental/investigational determination.
Definitions
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.