Contact Dissolution for Gallstones
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0509 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0509 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Defines Aetna's coverage stance for contact (direct solvent) dissolution of gallstones and the clinical context for its use; applies to providers submitting claims for this procedure under Aetna plans.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage Determination
Not covered — investigational
Aetna coverage determination:
None of the solvents (ethyl propionate, isopropyl acetate, methyl tertiary butyl ether) are FDA‑approved for this indication and safety and effectiveness have not been established.
Use of ethyl propionate (EP), isopropyl acetate (IA), or methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) for contact (direct solvent) dissolution of gallstones is excluded because these agents are not approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this indication and the safety and effectiveness have not been established.
Contact dissolution (direct solvent dissolution or litholysis) for gallstones is considered investigational and not medically necessary because the solvents used (EP, IA, MTBE) lack FDA approval for this indication and evidence of safety and effectiveness is insufficient. In addition, MTBE is no longer available because of concerns regarding toxicity.
Relevant Codes
| K80.00 - K80.81 | Cholelithiasis |
| No codes listed |
Provider Requirements and Implications
Experimental/Ininvestigational — Denial Risk
Contact dissolution (direct solvent dissolution/litholysis) for gallstones is considered experimental and investigational by Aetna; claims for this therapy are at high risk of denial.
- Agents: ethyl propionate, isopropyl acetate, methyl tertiary butyl ether
- Reason: No FDA-approved agent for this indication; safety and effectiveness not established
Prior Authorization and Documentation
Prior authorization is required when requesting contact dissolution therapies. Provide complete clinical justification and documentation to support medical necessity; absence of adequate documentation may lead to denial.
- Include proposed agent, route of administration, and planned monitoring
- Document high surgical risk or contraindication to standard surgical treatment if applicable
Therapy Alternatives / Step Therapy Context
Conservative and established alternatives must be considered and documented before pursuing contact dissolution. Actigall (ursodiol) therapy and standard surgical approaches (laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy) are the accepted treatments for symptomatic gallstones.
- Document trials of or contraindications to: Ursodiol (oral bile acid therapy)
- Document why laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy are not appropriate (e.g., prohibitive operative risk, patient refusal, comorbidities)
Preferred Documentation Elements
When reporting attempts at alternative therapies or prior treatments, include method, agent, duration, response, and any complications to support the request for nonstandard therapy.
- Preferred documentation elements: method (e.g., percutaneous catheter instillation), agent used, duration of therapy, clinical response, and any complications (e.g., duodenitis, hemolytic anemia, aspiration)
- Imaging and procedure reports (fluoroscopic/ultrasonographic guidance) and notes on attempts at drainage or stone clearance should be included
Background and Context
Gallstones (cholelithiasis) are common. Standard management for symptomatic gallstone disease is surgical removal of the gallbladder, typically by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. For selected patients who are not surgical candidates, noninvasive oral bile acid therapy with ursodiol has been used as an alternative. Contact dissolution refers to percutaneous transhepatic instillation of an organic solvent (for example, EP, IA, or MTBE) into the gallbladder via catheter to dissolve cholesterol stones; although some reports showed high complete dissolution rates in selected patients, the procedure is technically complex, associated with significant complication risk and high recurrence, and has been largely abandoned with the availability of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Definitions and Terminology
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.