Find policies, billing codes, payers, states, and providers
External Counterpulsation (ECP)
Customize your policy alerts
Sign up for Aetna Policy 0262 alerts
Get alerted when Policy 0262 changes without checking for updates manually.
Monitor payer policy activity
Medical policy governing coverage and medical necessity criteria for external counterpulsation (ECP)/enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) treatment, primarily for members with disabling chronic stable angina who are refractory to medical therapy and not candidates for revascularization.
No material clinical or coverage changes in this revision.
Coverage and Medical Necessity Criteria
Evidence summaries
Evidence summaries (no explicit coverage criteria in this excerpt) — evidence reviewed for multiple indications:
ALL of the following
- Chronic stable angina: randomized trial evidence (MUST-ECP) used a 35-hour/35-session protocol; no reliable evidence that extending therapy beyond 35 sessions improves outcomes.
Arora et al (1999); CMS (2006)
- Repeat ECP: registry data indicate some symptomatic benefit after repeat courses, but improvements often are not sustained; repeat therapy was used in about 18% within 2 years and symptomatic benefit varied.
Michaels et al (2005)
- Peripheral and vascular indications (eg, atherosclerosis obliterans, peripheral vascular disease): small studies and preliminary data suggest improvements in pain-free walking distance and hemodynamics, but findings require validation in well-designed trials.
Badtieva et al (2019); Braith et al (2010)
- Cerebrovascular disease / stroke: short-term studies show augmented cerebral blood flow and tissue oxygenation during ECP; clinical benefit in non-acute chronic cerebrovascular occlusive disease is preliminary and needs further validation.
Buschmann et al (2018)
- Erectile dysfunction: small, non‑randomized studies and limited observational data report improvements in erectile function after EECP; randomized controlled trials with larger samples and long-term follow-up are lacking.
Raeissadat et al (2018)
- Exercise endurance / COPD: pilot and small trials report improved exercise parameters after EECP in selected cohorts; evidence is preliminary.
Zhao et al (2020)
- Long COVID / post‑COVID syndromes: case reports and small retrospective cohorts report symptomatic improvements (eg, fatigue, PROMIS scores, 6MWD), but guideline reviews (UpToDate, ACC) do not list EECP as a recommended therapy and evidence remains hypothesis-generating.
Varanasi et al (2021); Sathyamoorthy et al (2022); UpToDate (2022); ACC (2022)
- Abnormal glucose tolerance and metabolic effects: small physiologic studies suggest potential improvements in resistance artery function and glycemic control, but require validation in larger, well‑designed trials.
Martin et al (2014)
- Overall evidence characterization: for refractory chronic stable angina there is randomized and registry evidence supporting a standardized 35‑session EECP course, whereas for other indications (eg, ED, cerebrovascular disease, COPD, peripheral artery disease, long COVID) evidence is preliminary, limited by small sample sizes, nonrandomized designs, short follow-up, and requires further high-quality trials.
BCBSA TEC, CTAF, CADTH, CMS assessments; literature reviews
Coding and Billing
| 93922 | Limited bilateral non-invasive physiologic studies of upper or lower extremity arteries |
| 93923 | Complete bilateral non-invasive physiologic studies of upper or lower extremity arteries, 3 or more levels |
| G0166 | External counterpulsation, per treatment session |
| I20.1-I20.9 | Angina pectoris [disabling, refractory to maximum medical therapy and not readily amenable to surgical intervention] |
| I25.111-I25.119 | Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery with angina pectoris |
| I25.701-I25.709 | Atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s) with angina pectoris |
| I25.711-I25.719 | Atherosclerosis of autologous vein coronary artery bypass graft(s) with angina pectoris |
| I25.721-I25.729 | Atherosclerosis of autologous artery coronary artery bypass graft(s) with angina pectoris |
| I25.731-I25.739 | Atherosclerosis of nonautologous biological coronary artery bypass graft(s) with angina pectoris |
| I25.751-I25.759 | Atherosclerosis of native coronary artery of transplanted heart with angina pectoris |
| G08 | Intracranial and intraspinal phlebitis and thrombophlebitis |
| G25.81 | Restless legs syndrome |
| H34.00-H34.9 | Retinal vascular occlusion |
| H91.20-H91.23 | Sudden idiopathic hearing loss |
| H93.11-H93.19 | Tinnitus |
| H93.A1-H93.A9 | Pulsatile tinnitus |
| I06.1 | Rheumatic aortic insufficiency |
| I10-I16.2 | Hypertensive disease |
| I11.0, I13.0-I13.2, I50.1-I50.9 | Heart failure and related codes |
| I20.0 | Unstable angina |
Prior Authorization & Provider Responsibilities
Prior Authorization: Evidence-Dependent
Prior authorization may be required and is evidence-dependent. Determinations for coverage of EECP/ECP will consider the clinical evidence described in this policy (including that findings for newer indications such as Long COVID are hypothesis-generating) and member-specific plan provisions. Refer to the plan's Clinical Policy Bulletin and member benefits for specific prior authorization rules.
- Prior authorization: contact the payer or consult the Clinical Policy Bulletin to confirm whether prior authorization is required for the member’s plan.
- Evidence-dependent: requests for ECP for indications outside the core medically necessary criteria (e.g., Long COVID) will be reviewed in light of available evidence; promising but hypothesis-generating findings are not sufficient by themselves to establish coverage.
- When prior authorization is required, submit documentation showing the member meets medical necessity criteria (see policy Section I.A.) and any prior authorization forms or clinical notes requested by the payer.
Documentation Requirements
Documentation must clearly support that the member has disabling chronic stable angina refractory to maximum medical therapy and is not readily amenable to surgical intervention, or meets the repeat-course criteria. Retain and submit all supporting records with authorization requests and claims.
- Document NYHA angina class (Class III or IV) and description of disabling symptoms.
- Document attempts and failure or intolerance of maximum medical therapy and why revascularization (PTCA or CABG) is not suitable (inoperable anatomy, high operative risk, or significant comorbidities).
- For repeat courses, document prior ECP response (≥25% reduction in angina frequency or improvement by ≥1 angina class) and that ≥3 months have elapsed since prior treatment.
Billing / Claim Denial Risk
Billing/claim denials may occur if ECP is billed using codes outside the covered code set or for experimental/noncovered indications. Use the covered HCPCS/CPT and ICD-10 codes only when selection criteria are met.
- Covered HCPCS: G0166 (External counterpulsation, per treatment session) when selection criteria are met.
- Do not bill for ECP using codes that correspond to indications listed as experimental/investigational in this policy (examples include fatigue/malaise, erectile dysfunction, Long COVID, heart failure, COPD exercise endurance).
- Claims lacking required documentation or billed for noncovered indications may be denied.
Evidence Limitation / Hypothesis-Generating Findings
Findings described in the literature for newer or nontraditional indications (for example, Long COVID) are hypothesis-generating and require broader clinical investigation; absence of guideline endorsement or inclusion in UpToDate/ACC guidance limits their weight for coverage decisions.
- Studies reporting benefit in Long COVID and other novel indications used validated outcome measures (PROMIS Fatigue, Seattle Angina Questionnaire [SAQ], Duke Activity Status Index [DASI], 6-minute walk distance [6MWD], CCS angina grade, Rose Dyspnea Scale, PHQ-9).
- Because these findings are preliminary, coverage for such indications will generally be considered investigational/experimental unless and until stronger evidence and guideline endorsement emerge.
Provider Responsibilities
Provider responsibility: providers are responsible for treatment decisions and must follow the Clinical Policy Bulletin and the member’s plan provisions when requesting authorization or submitting claims.
- Verify member benefits and prior authorization requirements before scheduling ECP.
- Provide complete clinical documentation with authorization requests and claims to reduce administrative delays or denials.
- Clinical Policy Bulletins guide administration but do not guarantee coverage; payers may update policies and plan provisions may vary.
Background and Scope
Enhanced external counterpulsation (ECP/EECP) is a noninvasive, outpatient mechanical therapy that uses sequential pneumatic cuffs on the lower limbs synchronized to the cardiac cycle to augment diastolic pressure, increase coronary perfusion, and reduce ventricular workload. A full course commonly consists of up to 35 sessions, typically delivered as 1–2 hour sessions five days per week over approximately seven weeks.
Definitions and Treatment Details
References and Revision History
Policy originally became effective; establishes coverage framework for external counterpulsation (ECP).
References added citing trials and evaluations of EECP in heart failure and exercise tolerance (PEECH trial and related publications).
Meta-analyses and additional studies on EECP efficacy for refractory angina and other indications were incorporated into the reference list.
2022 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on cardiovascular sequelae of COVID-19 cited in references, noting absence of EECP endorsement for long COVID management.
Most recent policy review completed (Last review 06/07/2023).
Policy administrative dates: Effective 06/18/1998; Last review 06/07/2023; Next review scheduled 03/14/2024. These dates reflect the Clinical Policy Bulletin publication and scheduled updates; plan-specific provisions should be consulted for authorization timing and requirements.
OpenPayer is powered by Trek Health's payer performance platform. Trek continuously ingests, validates, and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data alongside payer policies and other commercial payer data to create a structured payer intelligence foundation. OpenPayer uses this foundation to deliver personalized search results, dynamically generated policy pages, and tailored policy monitoring based on each user's payers, specialties, billing codes, and areas of interest. The same intelligence powers broader payer performance workflows, including reimbursement benchmarking, contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and financial decision-making.