Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayersuniversity-hlth-care-gundersen-lut
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut is a regional health insurer with concentrated Upper Midwest strength and a modest national ranking. Its scale is driven by deep penetration in a few states rather than a broad national footprint.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut operates as a regional commercial and government lines payer with a focused but meaningful national position. It is the #67 largest US A&H payer by premium and writes $2.31B in the US, representing a 0.16% US market share across 4 states. The organization reports an Estimated Total Members figure of 379.1K and operates through 4 affiliated subsidiaries.

    The payer's footprint is concentrated in the Upper Midwest, with its largest state presence driving most of its activity. This concentration shapes contracting leverage and network strategy: provider groups engaging the payer should expect negotiation dynamics driven by strong regional premium and membership density rather than broad national scale. Data indicates the payer does not report a #1 ranking in any state.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut's premium is exclusively reported in the US States & DC scope, accounting for 100.00% of its documented premium. There is no separate US territory or foreign premium reported for this payer, indicating an exclusively domestic mainland footprint. For providers, this concentration means contracting and network strategies should focus on the payer's regional operations within the documented states rather than expecting exposure from territories or international business.

    2 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC4$2.31B100.00%
    Total4$2.31B100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    4 rows

    SubsidiaryDomicile
    Quartz Health Benefit Plans CorporationWI
    Quartz Health Insurance CorporationWI
    Quartz Health Plan CorporationWI
    Quartz Health Plan of Minnesota CorporationMN

    National Market Presence

    University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut shows a highly concentrated premium footprint, with $2.17B written in WI alone and a national total of $2.31B. The payer's membership base mirrors premium concentration with 359K estimated members in WI out of 379.1K total members. This concentration indicates significant negotiating leverage in Wisconsin and localized network influence, while presence in IL, MN, and IA is comparatively modest.

    For provider contracting, the geographic concentration means that system-wide negotiations should prioritize Wisconsin-market terms and capacity planning. Multi-state provider groups should expect materially different commercial dynamics in WI versus IL, MN, and IA, with WI negotiations likely driving most financial outcomes.

    5 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$2.31B379.1K
    IA0.03%$4.08M612
    IL0.13%$82.0M11.8K
    MN0.18%$51.1M8.00K
    WI7.86%$2.17B359K
    Market Share by State — University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut

    State-by-State Market Position

    University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut's strongest presence is in the Midwest, particularly Wisconsin where it holds its top ranked state position and writes $2.17B in premium. The other Midwestern states in its footprint — Minnesota, Illinois, and Iowa — show much smaller premiums ($51.1M, $82.0M, and $4.08M, respectively) and correspondingly lower market shares.

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Estimated Member Demographics

    Nationally, the largest age bands are 6–18 and 55–64, each with over 57,000 members, followed closely by the 35–44 and 45–54 bands. The pediatric segment (Under 6 and 6–18) together accounts for over 82,000 members, indicating a strong family and youth presence. The senior segment (65–74 and 75+) is smaller but still significant, with over 54,000 members combined.

    Wisconsin dominates the member distribution, with over 358,000 estimated members, far outpacing other states. The age distribution in Wisconsin closely mirrors the national profile, while smaller states like Iowa and Minnesota have proportionally fewer members across all age bands. No state shows a dramatic skew toward older or younger populations, but the overall mix suggests a balanced need for pediatric, adult, and senior care.

    5 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total22.7K60.2K36.7K44.2K52.6K50.5K57.7K31.8K22.6K
    IA3810164718479865239
    IL7131.9K1.1K1.5K1.7K1.7K1.7K913670
    MN5181.3K7129411.1K1.0K1.1K695505
    WI21.5K56.9K34.8K41.7K49.6K47.7K54.8K30.2K21.4K
    Estimated Members by Age Band — UNIVERSITY HLTH CARE & GUNDERSEN LUT

    Related Subsidiaries

    QUARTZ-HEALTH-BENEFIT-PLANS-CORPORATION-95796

    Quartz Health Benefit Plans Corporation

    Coming soon

    QUARTZ-HEALTH-INSURANCE-CORPORATION-95341

    Quartz Health Insurance Corporation

    Coming soon

    QUARTZ-HEALTH-PLAN-CORPORATION-95101

    Quartz Health Plan Corporation

    Coming soon

    QUARTZ-HEALTH-PLAN-OF-MINNESOTA-CORPORATION-14202

    Quartz Health Plan of Minnesota Corporation

    Coming soon

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    Because the payer's premium and membership are concentrated in the Midwest, multi-state provider groups operating across broader regions (Northeast, Southeast, West, Southwest) will see limited exposure to this payer outside the Upper Midwest. For regional hospital systems and physician groups in Wisconsin, the payer represents a major counterparty and should be a primary focus for contracting strategy and network inclusion discussions.

    Estimated Members by State

    The geographic distribution of estimated members for UNIVERSITY HLTH CARE & GUNDERSEN LUT is highly concentrated in Wisconsin, which accounts for over 358,000 members. This is a direct reflection of the payer's strong market share and premium volume in the state. Illinois and Minnesota follow with 11,835 and 7,969 members respectively, while Iowa has a much smaller footprint with only 612 estimated members.

    This member concentration aligns closely with the payer's market share rank and premium written in each state. Wisconsin is the clear anchor market, both in terms of share and member volume, while other states represent secondary or tertiary markets. For providers, this means that contracting strategies and care delivery models should be tailored primarily to the Wisconsin population, with adjustments for the smaller, more dispersed member bases in Illinois, Minnesota, and Iowa. The geographic concentration also suggests that network adequacy and access standards will be most critical in Wisconsin, with less impact in the other states due to their limited member counts.

    Premium Written by State — University Hlth Care & Gundersen Lut ($)
    Estimated Members by State — UNIVERSITY HLTH CARE & GUNDERSEN LUT