Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayerstennessee-rural-hlth-grp
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP is a regional health insurer focused on concentrated state markets with a dominant presence in Tennessee. The payer's modest national premium makes it a niche but locally significant contracting counterparty.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP is a specialized regional health insurer with a concentrated national footprint, operating as the #140 ranked US A&H payer by premium. The organization writes the bulk of its business in the onshore US market — $275.11M in US premium — and holds a 0.02% US market share while reporting operations across 5 states.

    The plan serves an estimated 41.8K members and operates through 2 affiliated subsidiaries. The payer does not hold a #1 position in any US state. Its premium and membership are heavily concentrated in Tennessee, shaping provider contracting dynamics and network leverage primarily within that state.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP's premium is exclusively reported in the US States & DC scope, representing 100.00% of its recorded premium. There is no reported premium in US territories or foreign jurisdictions. This concentration implies that providers negotiating with this payer are primarily engaging around a domestic, state-focused book of business, with the greatest leverage and network impact residing where the payer has local density, notably Tennessee.

    2 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC5$275.11M100.00%
    Total5$275.11M100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    2 rows

    SubsidiaryDomicile
    Members Health Insurance CompanyAZ
    Trh Health Insurance CompanyTN

    National Market Presence

    National Market Footprint

    The payer's premium is overwhelmingly concentrated in Tennessee, with $264.19M written there versus much smaller premiums in Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, and Oklahoma. Estimated membership follows the same pattern: 39.98K members in Tennessee out of 41.8K total, indicating high geographic concentration. For national provider networks and contracting teams, this means negotiations and network design should prioritize Tennessee, where the payer has scale and local leverage.

    Outside Tennessee, the payer's presence is niche: the combined premium in the other four states totals roughly $10.92M, representing limited negotiating leverage for broad multi-state contracts. Provider groups with major footprints in Tennessee will find the most material commercial opportunity with this payer.

    6 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$275.11M41.8K
    AL0.03%$6.50M1.12K
    IN0.01%$2.62M0.422K
    KS0.01%$1.41M0.226K
    OK<0.01%$378K0.065K
    TN0.82%$264.19M39.98K
    Market Share by State — TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP

    State-by-State Market Position

    TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP's strongest presence is in the Southeast, driven overwhelmingly by Tennessee. The payer is effectively a regional player with meaningful concentration in the Southeast and only token exposure in the Midwest (Indiana, Kansas) and the Plains (Oklahoma). With $264.19M in Tennessee premium and 39.98K members there, the company's bargaining power and network impact are localized.

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Estimated Member Demographics

    Nationally, the largest age bands are 55–64 (6,052 members), 6–18 (6,318 members), and 45–54 (5,979 members), indicating a strong presence among both working-age adults and school-aged children. The smallest segments are the youngest (Under 6, 2,475 members) and oldest (75+, 2,368 members) populations.

    Tennessee, the payer's dominant state, mirrors the national profile with a concentration in adult age bands, but also maintains a substantial pediatric population. Other states, such as Alabama and Indiana, have much smaller member counts and do not show significant skew toward any particular age band. Overall, the demographic distribution is balanced, with a slight tilt toward adults, suggesting providers should focus on chronic disease management and preventive care for this population.

    6 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total2.5K6.3K4.0K5.4K5.8K6.0K6.0K3.4K2.4K
    AL6116211513715415716210069
    IN267043515858593324
    KS153924273128311813
    OK4106899964
    TN2.4K6.0K3.8K5.2K5.6K5.7K5.8K3.2K2.3K
    Estimated Members by Age Band — TENNESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP

    Related Subsidiaries

    MEMBERS-HEALTH-INSURANCE-COMPANY-94587

    Members Health Insurance Company

    Coming soon

    TRH-HEALTH-INSURANCE-COMPANY-89005

    Trh Health Insurance Company

    Coming soon

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    For multi-state provider groups, this distribution suggests a targeted approach: prioritize contracting and operational alignment in Tennessee to capture the bulk of the payer's membership and revenue. Expansion efforts in Alabama, Indiana, Kansas, and Oklahoma should be treated as opportunistic, given each state's relatively small premium (each below $7M) and limited member counts.

    Estimated Members by State

    TENNESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP's estimated member distribution is highly concentrated in Tennessee, with 39,977 members—over 95% of the payer's national total. Alabama follows with 1,116 members, while Indiana (422), Kansas (226), and Oklahoma (65) have much smaller member bases. This geographic concentration aligns closely with the payer's market share, which is highest in Tennessee (82%), and much lower in other states.

    The alignment between member count and market share rank is clear: Tennessee is both the largest and highest-share state, while the other states represent marginal presence. For providers, this means that contracting strategies and care delivery models should be tailored primarily for Tennessee, with only limited focus on the other states. Multi-state provider groups will find the payer's footprint to be highly localized, and should prioritize Tennessee for network inclusion and care management initiatives.

    Premium Written by State — TENNSESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP ($)
    Estimated Members by State — TENNESSEE RURAL HLTH GRP