Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayerssouthern-guar-ins-co
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    Southern Guar Ins Co Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    Southern Guar Ins Co is a regional health insurer with a concentrated footprint across select US states. It participates in provider networks where it has member concentration and maintains a small US territory presence.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Southern Guar Ins Co Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    Southern Guar Ins Co occupies a modest position in the US accident & health market as the #221 ranked US A&H payer with $35.22M in US premium and a US market share of 0%. The company reports operations across 22 states and DC-equivalent reporting and serves an estimated 5.3K members, operating with 0 affiliated subsidiaries.

    Southern Guar Ins Co also maintains a small US territory footprint, reporting $3.36K across 1 US territory. This concentrated premium profile and limited subsidiary network suggest the payer is regionally focused, with implications for selective provider negotiations and localized network strategies.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    Southern Guar Ins Co's premium is overwhelmingly concentrated in the US States & DC scope, accounting for 99.90% of reported premium. The US territory exposure is immaterial at $3.36K and represents roughly 0.01% of the payer's total premium. For providers evaluating this payer, contracting and credentialing effort should prioritize the US state footprint given the negligible territory presence.

    3 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC22$35.22M99.90%
    US Territories1$3.36K0.01%
    Total23$35.22M100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    National Market Presence

    Southern Guar Ins Co's premium is concentrated in a handful of Southern and Mid-Atlantic states, with notable premium pools in TX ($5.93M), PA ($3.62M), NC ($3.14M) and MD ($2.57M). The company reports 5.3K estimated members nationally. This concentration suggests provider contracting should be prioritized in states where premium exceeds $1.00M, as those markets will yield the largest patient volumes and reimbursement impact.

    Geographically, the payer's footprint skews toward the Southeast and parts of the Midwest and Mid-Atlantic, creating opportunities for regional provider groups to negotiate multi-state agreements primarily across neighboring states. National networks or broad multi-state deals are less critical given the payer's concentrated premium distribution; focused regional contracting will generally offer better ROI.

    21 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$35.22M5.3K
    AL0.01%$1.57M269
    AR0.01%$841K131
    AZ0.01%$654K146
    GA0.01%$856K142
    KY0.01%$2.22M254
    LA0%$1.11M106
    MD0.01%$2.57M527
    MS0.01%$1.73M271
    NC0.01%$3.14M472
    NM0%$271K27
    NV0%$373K61
    NH0%$7.36K1
    OH0%$1.14M155
    OK0.01%$1.98M339

    Showing 1–15 of 21

    Market Share by State — Southern Guar Ins Co

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Estimated Member Demographics

    Nationally, the largest age bands are 6–18 (821 members), 35–44 (760 members), 55–64 (758 members), and 45–54 (743 members). The smallest are Under 6 (312 members) and 75+ (310 members). Most states show a similar distribution, with Texas, Maryland, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Wisconsin having the highest member counts. States like New Hampshire, Alaska, and Delaware have negligible member presence.

    The demographic profile is relatively balanced across working-age adults and children, with a moderate senior population. No state stands out as significantly older or younger, though Texas and Maryland have the largest overall member counts, reflecting their population size and premium volume. This suggests providers in these states should be prepared for a broad mix of pediatric and adult care needs.

    23 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total312821504659760743758442310
    AK000000000
    AL153928333738392417
    AR7191316191919118
    AZ92314192019201210
    DE010111110
    GA8231418212220107
    KY153924313435362316
    LA616101316151596
    MD328044627574784933
    MS144128323939402316
    NC276945596770693928
    NH000000000
    NM142344432
    NV4105899943

    Showing 1–15 of 23

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 6

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    State-by-State Market Position

    Southern Guar Ins Co shows strongest presence in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic, with the largest premiums written in TX ($5.93M), PA ($3.62M), NC ($3.14M), and MD ($2.57M). These states collectively represent the payer's primary commercial and risk pools and will be the priority markets for network participation and rate negotiations.

    The Midwest and neighboring Southern states (e.g., WI at $2.10M, KY at $2.22M, TN at $2.20M) provide secondary concentration that can support regional contracting strategies. The West and New England presences are minimal; New Hampshire shows only $7.36K in premium. For multi-state provider groups, aligning contracting focus on the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic will capture the majority of member volume and premium exposure.

    Estimated Members by State

    SOUTHERN GUAR INS CO's estimated member distribution is concentrated in a handful of states, with Texas (811 members), Maryland (527 members), Pennsylvania (415 members), South Carolina (398 members), North Carolina (472 members), and Wisconsin (346 members) leading in member counts. These states also correspond to the highest premium volumes, indicating a direct alignment between premium written and member presence.

    States such as New Hampshire, Alaska, and Delaware have minimal member counts, reflecting either negligible market share or limited premium activity. The geographic concentration in the Southeast, Midwest, and select states in the West means providers in these regions are more likely to encounter SOUTHERN GUAR INS CO members. For provider groups, this concentration suggests that contracting strategies should prioritize these states for network inclusion and reimbursement negotiations, while the payer's presence in other states may be less impactful for volume-driven care delivery.

    Premium Written by State — Southern Guar Ins Co ($)
    Estimated Members by Age Band — SOUTHERN GUAR INS CO
    Estimated Members by State — SOUTHERN GUAR INS CO