Payer Overview
Longevity Hlth Grp Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State
Longevity Hlth Grp is a regional-focused health insurer with a concentrated multi-state footprint and targeted market influence in select Midwest and Northeast states. The payer emphasizes selective provider contracting driven by localized membership concentrations.
Payer Overview
Longevity Hlth Grp operates as a modest national health insurer ranked as the #158 payer in the US A&H market, writing $228M in US premium and holding a 0.02% US market share. The company reports a presence across 7 states and DC-equivalent reporting scope and serves an Estimated Total Members population of 33.4K, operating through 8 affiliated subsidiaries.
Although Longevity Hlth Grp does not hold a #1 position in any state, its concentrated footprints in the Midwest and Northeast create pockets of negotiating leverage with provider systems in those regions. The carrier’s focus on a limited number of states supports targeted network strategies and selective contracting where it can influence reimbursement and referral patterns.
8 rows
| Subsidiary | Domicile |
|---|---|
| Longevity Health Plan of Colorado Inc | CO |
| Longevity Health Plan of Florida Inc | FL |
| Longevity Health Plan of Illinois Inc | IL |
| Longevity Health Plan of Massachusetts Inc | — |
| Longevity Health Plan of Michigan Inc | MI |
| Longevity Health Plan of New Jersey Insurance Company Inc | NJ |
| Longevity Health Plan of New York Inc | NY |
| Longevity Health Plan of North Carolina Inc | NC |
National Market Presence
| State | Market Share | Premium Written | Estimated Members |
|---|---|---|---|
| CO | 0.05% | $11.1M | 2.26K |
| FL | 0.02% | $26.8M | 3.05K |
| IL | 0.05% | $33.7M | 4.86K |
| MI | 0.08% | $38.2M | 5.46K |
| NC | 0.08% | $41.1M | 6.19K |
| NJ | 0.1% | $48.6M | 6.73K |
| NY | 0.03% | $28.6M | 4.81K |
| National Total | — | $228M | 33.4K |
Longevity Hlth Grp's premium is concentrated in a small set of states, with the largest premium pools in New Jersey, North Carolina, and Michigan. The carrier writes $228M across these seven states, representing a focused national footprint rather than broad nationwide scale. From a contracting perspective, providers should expect negotiating leverage to vary by state: where membership is larger, the payer can steer referrals and influence network participation more effectively, while in smaller states the carrier will have limited leverage.
Geographic concentration into the Midwest and Northeast suggests that regional provider systems operating in those corridors should prioritize network engagement with Longevity Hlth Grp. Multi-state health systems will find the payer most relevant in states showing both higher premium and larger estimated membership such as NJ (approximately 6.73K members) and NC (approximately 6.19K members), which supports bilateral contracting strategies and population health initiatives targeted to those patient pools.
State-by-State Market Position
Longevity Hlth Grp shows its strongest positions in the Northeast and the Midwest, with New Jersey, Michigan, and North Carolina among the top states by premium. The Southeast and Florida have a presence but at lower relative market share and premium levels. The carrier’s distribution favors states where targeted network relationships can be developed rather than broad-market dominance.
For multi-state provider groups, the payer’s pattern means prioritizing contracting resources in the Northeast and Midwest to capture the most membership and premium. Smaller footprints in states like Colorado and New York indicate opportunities for selective agreements or narrow-network strategies rather than enterprise-wide contracting. Overall, Longevity Hlth Grp’s regional clustering supports focused negotiations and localized value-based arrangements rather than a single national network approach.
Estimated Member Demographics
| Age Band | Colorado | Michigan | Illinois | New York | New Jersey | Florida | North Carolina | National Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Under 6 | 137 | 315 | 293 | 282 | 417 | 154 | 351 | 1949 |
| 6–18 | 345 | 830 | 762 | 693 | 1048 | 415 | 900 | 4992 |
| 19–25 | 212 | 519 | 455 | 454 | 571 | 266 | 585 | 3061 |
| 26–34 | 333 | 633 | 623 | 638 | 805 | 365 | 775 | 4172 |
| 35–44 | 358 | 699 | 709 | 669 | 957 | 434 | 874 | 4700 |
| 45–54 | 312 | 726 | 680 | 655 | 979 | 449 | 914 | 4715 |
| 55–64 | 300 | 804 | 690 | 708 | 1035 | 487 | 910 | 4934 |
| 65–74 | 154 | 541 | 375 | 415 | 538 | 254 | 518 | 2793 |
| 75+ | 107 | 395 | 275 | 294 | 386 | 223 | 367 | 2047 |
Nationally, the largest age bands are 6–18 (4,992 members), 55–64 (4,934 members), and 45–54 (4,715 members), reflecting a strong presence among families and pre-retirement adults. The pediatric population (Under 6 and 6–18) is substantial, while the senior population (65–74 and 75+) is smaller but still significant.
State-level profiles show New Jersey and North Carolina with the highest member counts, both exhibiting a balanced age distribution. Florida, while having a lower total member count, has a relatively higher proportion of seniors (65–74 and 75+) compared to other states, suggesting a slightly older skew. Michigan and Illinois also have robust representation across all age bands, supporting a diverse care delivery need.
Estimated Members by State
LONGEVITY HLTH GRP's estimated member distribution is concentrated in New Jersey (6,735 members), North Carolina (6,193 members), and Michigan (5,461 members). Illinois and New York follow closely, each with nearly 5,000 members, while Florida and Colorado have smaller but still notable member populations.
This geographic concentration aligns with the payer's premium volume and market share, with New Jersey holding the highest market share and premium written. The member counts in North Carolina and Michigan also reflect strong market presence, despite not being top-ranked in their respective states. For providers, this means that contracting strategies should prioritize these states for network development and care delivery optimization, as they represent the largest pools of insured members.
The distribution suggests that LONGEVITY HLTH GRP is not dominant in any single state but maintains a meaningful presence across several regions. Providers operating in these states should be aware of the payer's member base and tailor their engagement and care models accordingly, especially in states with higher member counts and diverse age profiles.