Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayersinnovative-long-term-care-mgmt-grp
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp is a specialized payer with a concentrated multi-state footprint. Its membership and premium are focused regionally, requiring targeted contracting strategies.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp ranks as the #204 payer nationally and writes $61.8M in the US A&H market, reflecting a US market share of 0% across 3 states. The organization reports an estimated membership base of 8.8K and operates through 4 affiliated subsidiaries, positioning it as a niche regional player rather than a national incumbent.

    The payer's concentration is focused in a small number of states, and it does not hold a #1 position in any state. This concentrated footprint suggests negotiation leverage is localized: contracting and reimbursement strategies will be most effective when tailored to specific state markets where it has meaningful premium and membership, rather than pursued as a broad national initiative.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp's premium is exclusively within the US states and DC scope, with $61.8M written domestically and 100.00% of its reported premium in that scope. There is no reported premium in US territories or foreign jurisdictions. For providers, this concentration means contracting and revenue forecasting should focus on the domestic state markets where the payer operates rather than on territories or international exposure.

    2 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC3$61.8M100.00%
    Total3$61.8M100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    4 rows

    SubsidiaryDomicile
    Align Senior Care IncVA
    Align Senior Care of Florida IncFL
    Align Senior Care of Michigan LLCMI
    Lifeworks Advantage LLCVA

    National Market Presence

    Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp's premium and membership are heavily concentrated in the Midwest and a pair of Eastern states. With $42.1M written in Michigan alone, the payer's negotiating footprint will be most influential in that state where scale is meaningful relative to its overall size. The combined estimated membership of 8.8K is small on a national scale, so provider contracting teams should prioritize bespoke arrangements in Michigan while maintaining presence in Virginia and Florida.

    Because the majority of premium is clustered in a single state, national contracting leverage is limited. Provider groups that operate in Michigan stand to gain the most from targeted commercial discussions, while multi-state groups should calibrate expectations: the payer offers strong regional access but limited national volume.

    4 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$61.8M8.8K
    FL<0.01%$5.69M646
    MI0.08%$42.1M6.01K
    VA0.03%$14.0M2.15K
    Market Share by State — Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp

    State-by-State Market Position

    Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp shows its strongest presence in the Midwest through Michigan, with secondary positions in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic via Florida and Virginia. Michigan is the clear top state by premium and membership, indicating Midwest strength. The Southeast presence is modest, with Florida and Virginia contributing smaller but material premiums.

    For multi-state provider groups, this distribution means focused negotiation in Michigan will yield the highest return given the payer's scale there. Regional health systems seeking broader network agreements should treat this payer as a regional counterparty rather than a national partner, concentrating operational and contracting resources where the payer's membership and premium are concentrated.

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Estimated Member Demographics

    Nationally, the largest age bands are 6–18 (1,346 members), 55–64 (1,291 members), and 45–54 (1,196 members). The distribution is relatively even across adult age bands, with a moderate pediatric and adolescent presence and a smaller, but still significant, senior population (65+).

    Michigan, the payer's largest state, mirrors the national pattern, with the 6–18, 55–64, and 45–54 age bands being the most populous. Virginia and Florida have smaller total member counts, but their age distributions are similar, with no state showing a dramatic skew toward either younger or older populations. This suggests a broad-based member mix, requiring providers to be prepared for a full spectrum of care needs.

    4 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total5161.4K8241.0K1.2K1.2K1.3K829610
    FL3388567792951035447
    MI346914572696770799885595434
    VA137344195258307301303180128
    Estimated Members by Age Band — INNOVATIVE LONG TERM CARE MGMT GRP

    Estimated Members by State

    INNOVATIVE LONG TERM CARE MGMT GRP's estimated membership is highly concentrated in Michigan, which accounts for 6,012 members out of a national total of . Virginia follows with , while Florida has a much smaller presence at .

    Related Subsidiaries

    ALIGN-SENIOR-CARE-INC-16579

    Align Senior Care Inc

    Coming soon

    ALIGN-SENIOR-CARE-OF-FLORIDA-INC-16778

    Align Senior Care of Florida Inc

    Coming soon

    ALIGN-SENIOR-CARE-OF-MICHIGAN-LLC-16580

    Align Senior Care of Michigan LLC

    Coming soon

    LIFEWORKS-ADVANTAGE-LLC-15959

    Lifeworks Advantage LLC

    Coming soon

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools
    8,811
    2,153 members
    646 members

    This geographic distribution aligns closely with the payer's premium volume and market share, with Michigan being the clear anchor state. The relatively small member base in Florida, despite its large population, reflects the payer's limited market share there. For providers, this means that contracting opportunities and patient volume with this payer will be most significant in Michigan, with more limited impact in Virginia and Florida. Multi-state provider groups should prioritize Michigan for network participation and care management strategies with this payer, while viewing Virginia and Florida as secondary markets for this book of business.

    Premium Written by State — Innovative Long Term Care Mgmt Grp ($)
    Estimated Members by State — INNOVATIVE LONG TERM CARE MGMT GRP