Payer Overview
GROUP 1001 INS HOLDINGS GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State
GROUP 1001 INS HOLDINGS GRP is a national health insurer with a broad but modest footprint across the United States. The payer operates through multiple subsidiaries and focuses on regional provider relationships rather than dominating individual states.
Payer Overview
GROUP 1001 INS HOLDINGS GRP is the #114 ranked US Accident & Health payer by premium and operates across 50 states. Its US premium footprint totals $456.05M, representing a 0.03% US market share and rolling up through 12 affiliated subsidiaries. The carrier reports an estimated 80.8K members nationally, with concentrated premium in several states that drive its national positioning.
The company's profile is focused on a broad, low-share national footprint rather than dominance in a handful of states; it does not hold a #1 position in any state. This distribution implies sourcing and contracting strategies that emphasize regional provider network relationships and selective, state-specific negotiations rather than a single national network play.
12 rows
| Subsidiary | Domicile |
|---|---|
| Clear Spring Health (South Carolina) Inc | SC |
| Clear Spring Health Community Care Inc | IL |
| Clear Spring Health Company Inc | CO |
| Clear Spring Health Insurance Company | AZ |
| Clear Spring Health of Illinois Inc | IL |
| Clear Spring Health of Virginia Inc | — |
| Clear Spring Life & Annuity Company | DE |
| Delaware Life & Annuity Company | DE |
| Delaware Life Insurance Company | DE |
| Dl Reinsurance Company | DE |
| Eon Health Inc | GA |
| Gainbridge Life Insurance Company | DE |
National Market Presence
| State | Market Share | Premium Written | Estimated Members |
|---|---|---|---|
| AK | 0.08% | $1.41M | 393 |
| AL | 0.02% | $3.73M | 641 |
| AR | 0.03% | $3.89M | 608 |
| AZ | 0.02% | $3.71M | 827 |
| CA | 0.05% | $129.10M | 30.1K |
| CO | 0.08% | $17.85M | 3.62K |
| CT | 0.01% | $1.50M | 293 |
| DE | 0.05% | $1.55M | 395 |
| FL | 0.01% | $18.26M | 2.07K |
| GA | 0.06% | $28.23M | 4.70K |
| HI | 0.01% | $560K | 60 |
| IA | 0.03% | $4.06M | 610 |
| ID | 0.03% | $1.78M | 382 |
| IL | 0.08% | $52.83M | 7.63K |
| IN | 0.03% | $8.40M | 1.35K |
| KS | 0.03% | $3.78M | 605 |
| KY | 0.03% | $6.81M | 778 |
| LA | 0.01% | $4.21M | 404 |
| MA | 0.01% | $5.07M | 780 |
| MD | 0.05% | $10.67M | 2.19K |
| ME | 0.02% | $895K | 155 |
| MI | 0.02% | $9.34M | 1.33K |
| MN | 0.02% | $4.56M | 712 |
| MO | 0.02% | $5.83M | 939 |
| MS | 0.03% | $4.04M | 633 |
| MT | 0.06% | $1.77M | 459 |
| NC | 0.02% | $12.15M | 1.83K |
| ND | 0.03% | $1.11M | 220 |
| NE | 0.03% | $2.69M | 476 |
| NH | 0.01% | $828K | 159 |
| NJ | 0.02% | $10.40M | 1.44K |
| NM | <0.01% | $435K | 43 |
| NV | 0.03% | $3.62M | 589 |
| OH | 0.03% | $16.70M | 2.27K |
| OK | 0.02% | $3.55M | 608 |
| OR | 0.02% | $4.01M | 462 |
| PA | 0.01% | $10.41M | 1.19K |
| RI | 0.01% | $403K | 49 |
| SC | 0.03% | $7.68M | 1.22K |
| SD | 0.04% | $1.14M | 279 |
| TN | 0.02% | $5.46M | 826 |
| TX | 0.01% | $9.48M | 1.30K |
| UT | 0.01% | $1.52M | 373 |
| VA | 0.04% | $15.84M | 2.43K |
| VT | 0.02% | $463K | 110 |
| WA | 0.01% | $4.93M | 835 |
| WI | 0.02% | $4.46M | 737 |
| WV | 0.03% | $2.40M | 321 |
| WY | 0.06% | $897K | 258 |
| National Total | — | $456.05M | 80.8K |
GROUP 1001 INS HOLDINGS GRP shows a geographically broad but low-concentration premium footprint. The largest single-state premium is in CA at $129.10M, followed by IL at $52.83M and GA at $28.23M. Nationally reported premium sums to $456.05M and the carrier serves an estimated 80.8K members, so provider contracting teams should expect many states where the payer is a modest regional player rather than a market leader.
From a contracting perspective, the presence in higher-premium states like CA, IL, and GA suggests prioritizing negotiation resources in those markets where leverage and membership are greatest. In smaller states with sub-$1.00M premiums, operations and credentialing should be centralized to control overhead while still supporting local network access.
State-by-State Market Position
The payer's strongest regional presence is in the West and Midwest by premium concentration, led by California ($129.10M) and Illinois ($52.83M). The Southeast also contributes meaningful premium with Georgia at $28.23M and Florida at $18.26M, indicating a dispersed Southern footprint. The Northeast shows moderate positions with New Jersey and Pennsylvania each around $10.4M.
For multi-state provider groups, this distribution implies layered strategies: pursue deeper participation and better rates in CA and IL where premium and membership scale matter, maintain targeted contracting in GA and FL, and adopt standardized agreements for the many states with premiums under $5.00M to limit admin cost. Network development should balance focused local teams in high-premium states with centralized contracting for low-volume states.
Estimated Member Demographics
GROUP 1001 INS HOLDINGS GRP is estimated to cover 60,073 members nationally, based on Census × NAIC share calculations. The age distribution is as follows:
| Age Band | Estimated Members |
|---|---|
| Under 6 | 3,632 |
| 6-18 | 9,355 |
| 19-25 | 5,599 |
| 26-34 | 7,714 |
| 35-44 | 8,783 |
| 45-54 | 8,399 |
| 55-64 | 8,482 |
| 65-74 | 4,730 |
| 75+ | 3,378 |
The largest age band is 6-18, followed closely by the 35-44, 45-54, and 55-64 groups. This indicates a member base that is weighted toward families and working-age adults, with a smaller but meaningful senior population. Providers should expect a mix of pediatric, adult, and geriatric care needs, with utilization patterns reflecting preventive, chronic, and acute care across the age spectrum.
Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.