Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayersgranular-ins-co
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    Granular Ins Co Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    Granular Ins Co is a regional-focused health insurer with measurable presence in a subset of US states. The carrier serves a modest membership base and plays a niche role in provider networks rather than acting as a national market leader.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for Granular Ins Co Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    Granular Ins Co operates as a modestly sized national accident & health participant ranked as the #106 payer in the US market by premium. Its reported US premium is $560.65M, representing a 0.04% US market share across 45 states. The company reports an Estimated Total Members base of 92.8K and operates with 0 affiliated subsidiaries.

    Granular Ins Co does not hold a #1 position in any state. The firm's footprint is concentrated in a subset of states where it records measurable market share, and its US premium sits squarely within the company’s disclosed US-only scope rather than in territories or foreign markets. These dynamics suggest a payer with targeted regional penetration rather than broad national dominance.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    Granular Ins Co's premium is entirely reported within the US States & DC scope, accounting for 100.00% of its disclosed premium. There is no separate US territory or foreign premium reported for this payer, indicating the firm's exposure is concentrated exclusively in the US mainland reporting universe.

    For provider groups evaluating Granular Ins Co, this concentration implies contracting and network strategies should focus on US state-level operations rather than territory or foreign arrangements. The carrier's footprint is compact enough that targeted state-level relationships will capture the majority of its business.

    2 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC45$560.65M100.00%
    Total45$560.65M100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    National Market Presence

    National Market Footprint

    Granular Ins Co's premium footprint shows concentration in a mix of large-state and rural markets. The carrier writes notable premium in California ($66.4M), Texas ($52.0M), Pennsylvania ($37.9M) and Georgia ($29.6M), while it also posts above-average market share in smaller states such as Wyoming (0.32%) and Montana (0.15%). Nationally the company reports $560.65M in US premium and 92.8K members, indicating a compact but diversified geographic exposure.

    For provider contracting, this distribution means negotiating leverage will vary widely by market. In large states where premium is sizable (for example CA, TX, PA), Granular Ins Co may represent a meaningful commercial counterparty and require network participation to access membership; in smaller states with higher local share, the payer could be a dominant local buyer that warrants dedicated contracting strategies. Providers with multi-state footprints should prioritize relationships in CA, TX, PA and GA to capture the majority of the payer's premium while maintaining targeted arrangements in high-share smaller states.

    42 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$561M92.8K
    AL0.15%$31.7M5.45K
    AK0.17%$3.14M0.87K
    AZ0.06%$12.9M2.87K
    AR0.01%$1.69M0.26K
    CA0.03%$66.4M15.5K
    CO0.1%$21.1M4.28K
    CT0.08%$10.1M1.97K
    FL0.01%$19.0M2.16K
    GA0.07%$29.6M4.92K
    IA0.03%$4.64M0.70K
    ID0.03%$1.66M0.36K
    IL0.02%$13.7M1.97K
    IN0.03%$10.1M1.61K
    KS0.06%$8.06M1.29K

    Showing 1–15 of 42

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Estimated Member Demographics

    GRANULAR INS CO is estimated to cover 80,662 members nationally. The age distribution is as follows:

    The largest age bands are 6-18 (12,701 members) and the combined working-age adult bands (19-64), which together account for the majority of the membership. Pediatric and young adult populations are well represented, while the senior segment (65+) is comparatively smaller.

    This demographic profile suggests that GRANULAR INS CO's insured population is primarily composed of families and working-age adults. Providers should expect care utilization patterns typical of commercial insurance, with a focus on preventive care, chronic disease management, and pediatric services. The relatively modest senior population means less emphasis on geriatric care and Medicare-related services.

    46 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total5.6K14.6K8.8K11.9K13.5K12.9K13.1K7.3K5.2K
    AK63149711131321121177838
    AL296789560670750765792489336
    AR143926323837372317
    AZ171452275364398380393239197
    CA9752.4K1.4K2.2K2.4K2.2K2.1K1.1K760
    CO259654401631678591569291203
    CT111295187226267281322159121
    DC11171839322016118
    FL109294188258307318345180158
    GA287778473625730746699352232
    IA4311473809690975944
    ID236635425146462820
    IL119309184253287276280152112
    IN10026916519622222222512590

    Showing 1–15 of 46

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 6

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    State-by-State Market Position

    Granular Ins Co's strongest regional presence appears split between the West and the Midwest with meaningful pockets in the South. The West includes strong premium in California ($66.4M) and elevated share in Wyoming (0.32%) and Montana (0.15%), signaling both volume and niche dominance. The Midwest and Great Lakes show steady premium in Ohio ($28.1M), Minnesota ($15.3M), and Missouri ($16.6M). The Southeast registers material premiums in Georgia ($29.6M), Florida ($19.0M), and Alabama ($31.7M).

    Top-ranked positions are not held in any state (the payer has no #1 rankings), but the mix of high-dollar states (CA, TX, PA) and higher-share smaller states indicates a dual strategy: scale in populous markets and concentrated penetration in select rural states. For multi-state provider groups, this implies contracting should be tiered — prioritize broad access in CA, TX, and PA to capture volume while negotiating market-specific terms in high-share smaller states to protect local reimbursement dynamics.

    Market Share by State — Granular Ins Co
    Premium Written by State — Granular Ins Co ($)
    Estimated Members by Age Band — GRANULAR INS CO