Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayerseducators-mut-grp
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    EDUCATORS MUT GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    Educators Mut Grp is a specialist group benefits carrier with a concentrated regional footprint. It operates through a small set of affiliated subsidiaries and focuses membership and premium in a handful of western and southern states.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for EDUCATORS MUT GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    Educators Mut Grp operates as a specialized group benefits carrier with a focused national footprint and a concentrated state presence. The organization ranks as the #176 largest US A&H payer and writes $164.03M in US premium, capturing a 0.01% US market share across 13 states. The company reports an Estimated Total Members population of 35.9K and operates through 4 affiliated subsidiaries, reflecting a compact but regionally concentrated operation.

    The payer's most significant state concentration is in Utah, where it holds its largest market position; the payer does not hold a #1 position in any other state. This concentrated premium and membership base—focused largely in a single state and a small set of additional states—shapes its provider contracting dynamics and network leverage compared with broader national carriers.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    Educators Mut Grp's premium is exclusively concentrated in the US states footprint reported here. The payer has no reported premium in US territories or foreign jurisdictions, so all commercial A&H exposure is within the 13-state footprint. For providers, this means contracting and revenue opportunities will be driven entirely by activity in these US states rather than any territorial or international business.

    2 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC13$164.03M100.00%
    Total13$164.03M100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    4 rows

    SubsidiaryDomicile
    Educators Health Plans Life Accident &UT
    Educators Mutual Insurance AssocUT
    Total Dental Administrators Health PlaAZ
    Total Dental Administrators of UtahUT

    National Market Presence

    National Market Footprint

    Educators Mut Grp shows a highly concentrated premium footprint, with the vast majority of premium written in UT and TX and a meaningful secondary position in AZ. Total premium across the reported states is $164.03M, and membership totals 35.9K. This concentration means national provider networks will encounter uneven exposure: large opportunity and negotiating leverage in Utah, with modest pockets of volume in Arizona and Texas, and small enrollment in the remaining states.

    From a contracting perspective, national health systems and multi-state physician groups should prioritize building relationships and negotiating terms in Utah first, as network access there will affect the payer's largest membership cohort. Secondary discussions in Arizona and Texas are warranted to capture regional volume, while smaller states represent localized, lower-impact contracting opportunities.

    14 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$164.03M35.9K
    AL<0.01%$636K109
    AZ0.11%$23.9M5.34K
    FL0.03%$1.62M183
    GA0.01%$3.15M524
    ID0.03%$2.06M443
    MI<0.01%$838K120
    NC<0.01%$936K141
    NV<0.01%$219K36
    PA<0.01%$726K83
    TN<0.01%$843K127
    TX0.02%$26.9M3.68K
    UT0.88%$101M24.8K
    WY0.05%$793K229
    Market Share by State — EDUCATORS MUT GRP

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Estimated Member Demographics

    Nationally, the largest age bands are 6–18 (7,185 members) and Under 6 (2,772 members), followed by the young adult and middle-aged bands. Utah, the payer's dominant state, mirrors this trend with a particularly high concentration of children and adolescents. States like Arizona and Texas also show substantial numbers in these younger age bands, reinforcing the payer's focus on families and school-aged populations.

    Some states, such as Pennsylvania and Nevada, have very small member counts across all age bands, reflecting limited market presence. The senior population (65+) is relatively small in all states, indicating that EDUCATORS MUT GRP is not a major player in Medicare or senior-focused insurance. Overall, the demographic profile is youthful, with a strong emphasis on pediatric and family care.

    14 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total2.8K7.2K4.1K4.8K5.2K4.4K3.9K2.1K1.5K
    AL6161113151516107
    AZ318841513678740708732444367
    FL92516222627291513
    GA318350677879743725
    ID288244526357583525
    MI7181114151618129
    NC8201318202121128
    NV263555532
    PA51281011111386
    TN8191216181818107
    TX239621354498578529476233153
    UT2.1K5.4K3.0K3.3K3.6K2.9K2.4K1.2K839
    WY144020263329322113
    Estimated Members by Age Band — EDUCATORS MUT GRP

    Related Subsidiaries

    EDUCATORS-HEALTH-PLANS-LIFE-ACCIDENT--12515

    Educators Health Plans Life Accident &

    Coming soon

    EDUCATORS-MUTUAL-INSURANCE-ASSOC-81701

    Educators Mutual Insurance Assoc

    Coming soon

    TOTAL-DENTAL-ADMINISTRATORS-HEALTH-PLA-52120

    Total Dental Administrators Health Pla

    Coming soon

    TOTAL-DENTAL-ADMINISTRATORS-OF-UTAH-11560

    Total Dental Administrators of Utah

    Coming soon

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    State-by-State Market Position

    Educators Mut Grp's strongest presence is in the West and Southwest, anchored by a dominant position in Utah where it writes $101M in premium and serves the largest share of its members. Arizona and Texas represent the next-largest markets at $23.9M and $26.9M respectively, giving the carrier meaningful regional strength across the Mountain West and parts of the Southwest/South.

    The Midwest and Northeast show minimal exposure, with each state contributing less than $1M in premium and very small membership counts. For multi-state provider groups, this geographic distribution implies that negotiating a statewide agreement in Utah provides the greatest return on contracting effort, while multi-state agreements covering Arizona and Texas should be evaluated for incremental volume. Smaller states can be managed via localized arrangements or included opportunistically in regional contracts.

    Estimated Members by State

    EDUCATORS MUT GRP's estimated member distribution is highly concentrated in Utah, with 24,845 members, representing the vast majority of its national membership. Arizona and Texas follow with 5,341 and 3,681 members respectively, while all other states have fewer than 1,000 members each. This aligns closely with the payer's market share and premium volume, as Utah is the only state where EDUCATORS MUT GRP holds a significant market share (0.88, rank 9).

    The geographic concentration in Utah, Arizona, and Texas means that providers in these states are most likely to encounter EDUCATORS MUT GRP members. In contrast, states like Pennsylvania, Nevada, and Alabama have minimal member counts, reflecting negligible market share and limited provider contracting impact. For providers, this means that contracting strategies and care delivery models should be tailored to the needs of Utah, Arizona, and Texas populations, with less emphasis on other regions unless local market conditions change in the future.

    Premium Written by State — EDUCATORS MUT GRP ($)
    Estimated Members by State — EDUCATORS MUT GRP