Payer Overview
Devoted Health Group Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State
Devoted Health Group is a focused national insurer with concentrated state-level footprints. It competes by building deep provider relationships in select states rather than broad nationwide scale.
Payer Overview
Devoted Health Group operates as a specialized health insurer focused on coordinated coverage and senior-focused Medicare Advantage products. Nationally it ranks as the #49 largest US A&H payer with $3.28B in US premium and a 0.23% US market share, operating across 13 states. The company reports an estimated total membership of 462.1K and operates through 33 affiliated subsidiaries, reflecting a focused but meaningful footprint in select state markets.
Devoted Health Group's premium is concentrated in the continental United States; there is no reported premium in US territories or foreign markets in the data provided. This concentrated US presence supports provider contracting strategies that prioritize deep, state-level partnerships rather than broad national network rollouts.
33 rows
| Subsidiary | Domicile |
|---|---|
| Devoted Health Insurance Company | FL |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Alabama Inc | AL |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Arizona Inc | AZ |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Arkansas Inc | AR |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Colorado Inc | CO |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Georgia Inc | GA |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Hawaii Inc | HI |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Illinois Inc | IL |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Indiana | IN |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Kentucky Inc | KY |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Mississippi | MS |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Pennsylvania North Carolina | PA |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of South Carolina | SC |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Tennessee Inc | TN |
| Devoted Health Insurance Company of Texas | TX |
Showing 1–15 of 33
National Market Presence
| State | Market Share | Premium Written | Estimated Members |
|---|---|---|---|
| AL | 0.68% | $142M | 24.4K |
| AZ | 1.27% | $279M | 62.3K |
| CO | 0.57% | $121M | 24.6K |
| FL | 0.73% | $949M | 108K |
| HI | 0.69% | $68.6M | 7.34K |
| IL | 0.26% | $165M | 23.8K |
| NC | 0.06% | $28.9M | 4.36K |
| OH | 1.04% | $627M | 85.3K |
| OR | 0.20% | $52.1M | 6.00K |
| PA | 0.04% | $34.3M | 3.94K |
| SC | 0.20% | $45.7M | 7.28K |
| TN | 0.20% | $63.7M | 9.63K |
| TX | 0.49% | $698M | 95.5K |
| National Total | — | $3.28B | 462.1K |
Devoted Health Group's premium is concentrated in a relatively small set of states, with $3.28B in aggregate premium across the listed markets and 462.1K estimated members. The largest single-state premiums are in Florida, Texas, Ohio, and Arizona, indicating regional strength where the payer can negotiate meaningful provider terms. For national provider groups, these concentrated positions mean contracting strategies should prioritize those high-premium states where leverage is greatest while maintaining selective participation elsewhere.
Geographic concentration also affects network design and care management investments. With major premium pools in Florida, Texas, Ohio, and Arizona (each represented as hundreds of millions in premium), Devoted Health Group can support targeted value-based arrangements and care management programs in those states. In lower-premium states, providers may encounter narrower networks or limited plan penetration, so multi-state groups should balance the operational cost of contracting in many states against the revenue potential in the top markets.
State-by-State Market Position
Devoted Health Group shows its strongest presence in the Sun Belt and large-population states. The payer's top premium states — Florida ($949M), Texas ($698M), Ohio ($627M), and Arizona ($279M) — indicate a strategic concentration in the Southeast, Southwest, and parts of the Midwest. These markets collectively account for the majority of the payer's premium and membership, which benefits providers seeking scale deals in those regions.
The Northeast and smaller Mid-Atlantic states show limited presence, with Pennsylvania representing only $34.3M in premium and a 0.04% market share. For multi-state provider groups, the distribution implies focusing contractual and operational resources on high-premium states for maximum return, while considering narrow or product-specific participation in lower-premium states. Regional alignment with the payer's market hubs will be key to unlocking value-based contracting opportunities.
Estimated Member Demographics
DEVOTED HLTH GRP is estimated to insure 462,147 members nationally across all age bands. The following table summarizes the estimated member counts by age band:
| Age Band | Estimated Members |
|---|---|
| Under 6 | 27,005 |
| 6-18 | 70,794 |
| 19-25 | 43,041 |
| 26-34 | 58,421 |
| 35-44 | 66,793 |
| 45-54 | 65,112 |
| 55-64 | 66,380 |
| 65-74 | 36,647 |
| 75+ | 27,954 |
The largest age bands are 6-18 (70,794 members), 35-44 (66,793 members), 45-54 (65,112 members), and 55-64 (66,380 members). This distribution indicates a strong presence among families and working-age adults, with a substantial senior population as well.
Providers should expect a diverse mix of care needs, ranging from pediatric preventive services to chronic disease management for older adults. The balanced age distribution suggests that DEVOTED HLTH GRP's insured population will require comprehensive primary care, specialty services, and care coordination across the lifespan.
Estimated Members by State
DEVOTED HLTH GRP's estimated member counts vary significantly by state. The largest concentrations are in Florida (107,754 members), Texas (95,506 members), Ohio (85,287 members), and Arizona (62,278 members). Other states with notable member counts include Colorado, Alabama, and Illinois, each with over 20,000 members.
This geographic distribution aligns with the payer's premium volume and market share in these states, though some states with high premium do not necessarily have the highest member counts. For example, Florida leads both in premium and member count, while Texas and Ohio also show strong alignment. States like Pennsylvania and North Carolina have lower member counts, reflecting their smaller market share and premium volume.
For providers, this concentration means that contracting strategies should prioritize states with the largest member populations, as these will drive the bulk of care delivery and reimbursement volume. Multi-state provider groups should focus on Florida, Texas, Ohio, and Arizona for network optimization and care management programs, while also considering the unique needs of smaller member populations in other states.