Loading...

    Explore
    • Policy Monitoring
    • Live Policy Feed
    • Billing Codes
    • NPI Medicare & Medicaid
    • Healthcare Providers
    • Health Insurance Payers
    • States
    • Service Lines
    • Taxonomy Codes
    Lookup tools
    • Billing Code Lookup
    • CPT Modifier Lookup
    • Provider Taxonomy Code Lookup
    • Healthcare Provider & Facility Lookup
    • Health Insurance Payer Lookup
    • Payer Contact Directory

    Policy & Benchmark Tools

    • Prior Authorization Lookup
    • Coverage Criteria Lookup
    • Timely Filing Lookup
    • Billing Code Reimbursement Rates
    • Payer Comparison Dashboard
    • Facility Comparison Dashboard
    • All tools

    Company

    • About OpenPayer
    • Data Sources
    • Trek Health
    OpenPayerby Trek Health
    LinkedInYouTube

    © 2026 Trek Health. All rights reserved.

    OpenPayer is built and maintained by Trek Health.

    v1.0.28
    OpenPayerPayerscvs-grp
    Ask Trek AI about this page

    CVS GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State

    CVS GRP is a major national health insurer with broad state coverage and a diversified footprint that includes US territories and Canada. Its scale offers leverage in provider contracting and requires tailored regional strategies.

    Customize your policy alerts

    Sign up for CVS GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State policy alerts

    Get alerted when relevant policies change without checking for updates manually.

    Monitor payer policy activity

    Receive email alerts as soon as relevant payer policies are published or updated.

    Payer Overview

    CVS GRP is the #2 largest US A&H payer by premium, writing $121.07B in the US and operating across 50 states + DC. The organization serves an estimated 18.23M members and operates through 56 affiliated subsidiaries, giving it both national scale and a broad administrative footprint.

    The company also maintains a measured US territory presence, with $39.10M written across 5 territories, and a Canada exposure of $18.07M. These non-US lines supplement a primarily domestic business and create modest cross-jurisdictional considerations for network and regulatory strategy.

    Premium & Market Share

    Premium by Scope

    CVS GRP's premium is overwhelmingly concentrated in the US States & DC, which account for essentially the entire premium base. The US Territories and Canada positions are small relative to the mainland business and are likely operationally peripheral rather than core revenue drivers. For providers, this concentration means negotiations and network strategy should prioritize the US state-level relationships where contracting impact will be largest.

    4 rows

    ScopeJurisdictionsPremiumShare of Payer Total
    US States & DC50 states + DC$121.07B99.95%
    US Territories5$39.10M0.03%
    Foreign (Canada + AOA)1$18.07M0.01%
    Total56$121.13B100.00%

    Subsidiary Filings

    56 rows

    SubsidiaryDomicile
    Accendo Insurance CompanyUT
    Aetna Better Health Inc (Connecticut Corporation)CT
    Aetna Better Health Inc (Louisiana Corporation)LA
    Aetna Better Health Inc (New Jersey Corporation)NJ
    Aetna Better Health Inc (Ohio Corporation)OH
    Aetna Better Health Inc (Pennsylvania Corporation)PA
    Aetna Better Health Inc A of Georgia CorporationGA
    Aetna Better Health Premier Plan MmaiIL
    Aetna Better Health of Florida IncFL
    Aetna Better Health of Illinois IncIL
    Aetna Better Health of Kansas IncKS
    Aetna Better Health of Kentucky Insurance CompanyKY
    Aetna Better Health of Michigan IncMI
    Aetna Better Health of Missouri LLCMO
    Aetna Better Health of North Carolina IncNC

    Showing 1–15 of 56

    National Market Presence

    National Market Footprint

    CVS GRP has a concentrated footprint in several Mid-Atlantic, Southern, and Midwestern states, with particularly large premiums in Florida, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, and Texas. These high-premium states drive national revenue and give the payer negotiating leverage with large hospital systems and regional provider networks. Providers contracting at national scale should prioritize relationship and rate strategies in states where CVS GRP writes billions in premium, since those markets represent the most material share of membership and spending.

    Geographic concentration also means that local provider market dynamics—such as hospital system market power and state-level regulatory pressures—will materially influence contracting outcomes. Multi-state provider groups should map their network priorities to the states listed above where CVS GRP carries the most members and premium to maximize negotiation efficiency.

    50 rows

    StateMarket SharePremium WrittenEstimated Members
    National Total—$121.07B18.23M
    AK3.47%$63.1M17.6K
    AL3.66%$759M130.2K
    AR5.86%$706M110.4K
    AZ9.86%$2.16B482.3K
    CA2.25%$5.90B1.37M
    CO4.29%$914M185.5K
    CT18.10%$2.44B474.4K
    DE15.76%$508M129.3K
    FL9.34%$12.1B1.37M
    GA10.23%$4.64B771.9K
    HI0.31%$30.8M3.3K
    IA6.90%$1.11B166.7K
    ID3.64%$233M50.3K
    IL15.45%$9.78B1.41M

    Showing 1–15 of 50

    About ACA Marketplace Data

    The Affordable Care Act (ACA) established federally-facilitated health insurance marketplaces ("exchanges") where individuals and small businesses can shop for and enroll in health plans, often with income-based subsidies. Issuers that participate in these marketplaces are required to report enrollment, claims, and denial data to CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) each year.

    The sections below cover this payer's ACA marketplace-specific footprint — enrollment, plan portfolio, and claims/denial-rate data. This is a narrower, separate population from the NAIC-based commercial data shown earlier on this page (total premium, market share, and membership across all lines of business): ACA marketplace enrollment is typically a small fraction of a payer's total commercial book, and the two datasets should not be treated as equivalent. CMS claims-transparency reporting has also been inconsistent industry-wide since 2020 — many issuers have little or no data for 2021 onward, so a single reporting year is common and does not necessarily indicate anything about the payer's current ACA presence.

    Member Demographics

    Nationally, the largest age bands for CVS GRP are 6-18 (2.81M), 55-64 (2.63M), and 35-44 (2.61M), indicating a strong presence among both families with children and older working-age adults. The <6 age band is also substantial (1.08M), reinforcing the importance of pediatric coverage in their portfolio.

    Some states, such as Florida (100K in >75), New York (74.7K in >75), and New Jersey (57.1K in >75), have notably high counts in the >75 age band, suggesting a relatively older insured population. Conversely, states like Texas and California have large numbers in the younger age bands, reflecting a more balanced or younger demographic profile.

    52 rows

    State<66-1819-2526-3435-4445-5455-6465-74>75
    National Total1.08M2.81M1.70M2.29M2.61M2.55M2.63M1.48M1.08M
    AK1.3K3K1.4K2.3K2.7K2.3K2.4K1.6K772
    AL7.1K18.9K13.4K16K17.9K18.3K18.9K11.7K8.0K
    AR5.9K16.3K10.9K13.5K15.8K15.5K15.7K9.6K7.0K
    AZ28.7K76K46.3K61.2K66.8K63.9K66.1K40.1K33.2K
    CA86.5K213K125K193K214K195K187K93.7K67.4K
    CO11.2K28.4K17.4K27.4K29.4K25.7K24.7K12.6K8.8K
    CT26.7K71.1K45.1K54.5K64.3K67.7K77.5K38.3K29.2K
    DC3.5K5.6K6.0K12.6K10.5K6.3K5.1K3.4K2.7K
    DE7.2K18.9K10.6K14.5K16.6K16.7K20K14.7K10.1K
    FL69.3K186K120K164K195K202K219K114K100K
    GA45K122K74.2K98.1K114K117K110K55.1K36.4K
    HI199466246375472443461356280
    IA10.3K27.4K17.4K19.3K22.9K21.6K23.3K14.1K10.5K
    ID3.2K9.3K5.0K6.0K7.2K6.5K6.5K4.0K2.8K

    Showing 1–15 of 52

    Related Subsidiaries

    ACCENDO-INSURANCE-COMPANY-63444

    Accendo Insurance Company

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-INC-A-OF-GEORGIA-CORPORATION-12328

    Aetna Better Health Inc A of Georgia Corporation

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-INC-CONNECTICUT-CORPORATION--13174

    Aetna Better Health Inc (Connecticut Corporation)

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-INC-LOUISIANA-CORPORATION--15616

    Aetna Better Health Inc (Louisiana Corporation)

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-INC-NEW-JERSEY-CORPORATION--15611

    Aetna Better Health Inc (New Jersey Corporation)

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-INC-OHIO-CORPORATION--14229

    Aetna Better Health Inc (Ohio Corporation)

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-INC-PENNSYLVANIA-CORPORATION--13735

    Aetna Better Health Inc (Pennsylvania Corporation)

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-OF-FLORIDA-INC-95114

    Aetna Better Health of Florida Inc

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-OF-ILLINOIS-INC-14053

    Aetna Better Health of Illinois Inc

    Coming soon

    AETNA-BETTER-HEALTH-OF-KANSAS-INC-16072

    Aetna Better Health of Kansas Inc

    Coming soon

    Showing 1–10 of 56

    References

    1. 1.2024 Market Share Reports for the Top Accident and Health Insurance Groups and Companies by State and Countrywide. National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Ranks the largest accident and health insurance carriers nationwide and by state, the source for this payer's market share and direct-premium figures.
    2. 2.Health Insurance Exchange Public Use Files (Exchange PUFs). Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Retrieved Aug 11, 2026.Plan-level enrollment, premium, and cost-sharing data submitted by issuers participating in the ACA Marketplace, the source for this payer's exchange presence figures.
    Published by

    Trek Health powers OpenPayer with a leading commercial payer intelligence platform, seamlessly converting fragmented payer data into actionable insights for provider organizations.

    Trek Health ingests and normalizes Transparency in Coverage data and payer policy updates to give provider organizations a clear view of how commercial reimbursement behaves across markets, payers, and services. Our platform transforms raw payer disclosures into structured intelligence that supports contract evaluation, payer negotiations, and service line strategy. By combining market benchmarks with ongoing policy visibility, Trek helps teams identify variability, risk, and opportunity in commercial reimbursement. The result is faster insight, stronger negotiating positions, and more informed financial decisions.

    Table of contents

    Progress1 / 7

    Explore openpayer tools

    • Billing CodesCPT, HCPCS, DRG & more
    • Reimbursement RatesCommercial vs. Medicare rate reports
    • ProvidersHospitals & facilities
    • PayersPlans & market footprint
    • Taxonomy CodesNUCC specialty codes
    • ModifiersCPT modifiers & usage
    • Prior AuthorizationPA policies by payer & drug
    • Timely FilingFiling deadlines by payer
    • Coverage CriteriaMedical necessity by payer
    • Payer ContactsClaims, PA & appeals contacts
    View all tools

    State-by-State Market Position

    CVS GRP's strongest regional presence appears in the Southeast and Midwest, with particularly dominant market shares and premium in states like West Virginia (22.11% share, $1.91B premium), Kansas (20.60%, $2.89B), Connecticut (18.10%, $2.44B), Illinois (15.45%, $9.78B), and New Jersey (14.63%, $7.20B). The Northeast and parts of the Midwest show multiple states with double-digit market share, creating dense pockets of influence for regional provider networks.

    In the West and Mountain states the payer's share is generally more modest, often mid-single digits, though there are exceptions such as Arizona (9.86%, $2.16B). For multi-state provider groups, this distribution suggests a hybrid contracting approach: aggressive, value-based negotiations in high-share states and selective participation or narrower networks in lower-share Western markets. Overall, state-by-state concentration underscores the need for tailored local strategies rather than a one-size-fits-all national contract.

    Estimated Members by State

    CVS GRP's estimated member distribution is heavily concentrated in a handful of populous states. California (1.37M), Florida (1.37M), Illinois (1.41M), New York (1.22M), Texas (1.15M), and Ohio (936K) each have over 900K members, making them the largest markets for CVS GRP. New Jersey (997K) and Pennsylvania (958K) also have substantial member counts. In contrast, states like Hawaii (3.30K), North Dakota (8.37K), Vermont (14.3K), and Wyoming (17.2K) have much smaller member populations, reflecting the payer's limited presence in less populous regions.

    This geographic concentration aligns closely with overall market share, as CVS GRP's largest member counts are found in states with the highest populations. For providers, this means that CVS GRP-insured patients will be most prevalent in major metropolitan areas and health systems within these states. The payer's footprint in smaller states is minimal, which may limit provider engagement and network development in those regions. Providers in high-member states should expect significant volumes and a diverse patient mix, while those in smaller states may see fewer CVS GRP-insured patients.

    Market Share by State — CVS GRP
    Premium Written by State — CVS GRP ($)
    Estimated Members by Age Band — CVS GRP
    Estimated Members by State — CVS GRP