Payer Overview
AMERICAN HLTH CO INC GRP Market Analysis: Market Share and Coverage by State
American Health Co Inc Group is a regional commercial and A&H payer with concentrated strength across select Midwestern and Southern states. Its footprint is modest nationally and concentrated in specific markets, which has practical implications for multi-state provider contracting.
Payer Overview
American Health Co Inc Group is the #162 ranked US A&H payer by premium, reporting $223.08M in US premium and operating across 12 states. The organization serves an estimated 34.8K members nationally and operates through 13 affiliated subsidiaries, which support its regional operations and contracting footprint.
While the payer does not hold a #1 position in any state, its presence is concentrated in a handful of Midwestern and Southern states where it writes the bulk of its premium. This regional focus shapes contracting leverage locally and suggests provider groups should evaluate targeted network strategies rather than a single national playbook.
13 rows
| Subsidiary | Domicile |
|---|---|
| Ameican Health Plan of Missouri Inc | MO |
| American Health Plan Inc | TN |
| American Health Plan of Florida Inc | FL |
| American Health Plan of Indiana Inc | IN |
| American Health Plan of Iowa Inc | IA |
| American Health Plan of Mississippi Inc | MS |
| American Health Plan of Pennsylvania Inc | PA |
| American Health Plan of Texas Inc | TX |
| American Health Plan of Utah Inc | UT |
| Dignity Care Corporation | LA |
| Georgia Assurance Inc | GA |
| Kansas Superior Select Inc | KS |
| Oklahoma Superior Select Inc | OK |
National Market Presence
| State | Market Share | Premium Written | Estimated Members |
|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 0.11% | $50.3M | 8.37K |
| IA | 0.19% | $30.4M | 4.57K |
| ID | 0.1% | $6.58M | 1.42K |
| IN | 0.02% | $5.03M | 808K |
| KS | 0.17% | $23.6M | 3.78K |
| LA | 0.06% | $16.9M | 1.62K |
| MO | 0.06% | $15.5M | 2.50K |
| MS | 0.17% | $20.8M | 3.25K |
| OK | 0.06% | $9.57M | 1.64K |
| TN | 0.08% | $25.9M | 3.92K |
| TX | 0.01% | $14.9M | 2.03K |
| UT | 0.03% | $3.59M | 0.88K |
| National Total | — | $223.08M | 34.8K |
American Health Co Inc Group's premium is concentrated in a small set of Midwestern and Southern states, with the largest single-state premiums in Georgia and Iowa at $50.3M and $30.4M respectively. The total reported premium across the 12-state footprint is $223.08M, serving about 34.8K members. This concentration indicates contracting negotiations and network optimization will be most impactful when focused on these key states where the payer writes the majority of its business.
Geographically, the payer's footprint is not nationally uniform: it favors the Midwest and Southeast, which suggests provider networks that are strong in those regions can gain disproportionate leverage. For national provider groups, a targeted approach in these states will likely yield better reimbursement and participation outcomes than pursuing a broad, low-intensity national strategy.
State-by-State Market Position
The strongest presence for American Health Co Inc Group appears in the Midwest and Southeast. Iowa and Kansas in the Midwest, and Georgia and Mississippi in the Southeast, represent the firm's most significant premium and market share positions. Iowa and Georgia alone account for a combined $80.7M in premium, emphasizing regional strength rather than a broad national footprint.
For multi-state provider groups, the distribution implies that negotiating standard terms nationwide may be inefficient. Instead, focusing resources on the Midwest and Southeast where the payer has scale will likely produce the greatest contract value. The payer's limited presence in the West and Northeast reduces urgency for broad geographic credentialing outside its core states.
| <6 | 6-18 | 19-25 | 26-34 | 35-44 | 45-54 | 55-64 | 65-74 | >75 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GA | 488 | 1.32K | 804 | 1.06K | 1.24K | 1.27K | 1.19K | 598 | 395 |
| IA | 282 | 751 | 476 | 528 | 627 | 592 | 639 | 387 | 288 |
| ID | 89 | 260 | 140 | 167 | 201 | 181 | 184 | 112 | 79 |
| IN | 50 | 134 | 82 | 98 | 111 | 111 | 113 | 63 | 45 |
| KS | 251 | 658 | 394 | 448 | 526 | 474 | 514 | 300 | 216 |
| LA | 96 | 246 | 148 | 197 | 241 | 223 | 235 | 143 | 94 |
| MS | 171 | 486 | 333 | 387 | 465 | 471 | 474 | 274 | 189 |
| MO | 155 | 401 | 244 | 315 | 358 | 335 | 360 | 188 | 141 |
| OK | 94 | 259 | 161 | 201 | 239 | 216 | 223 | 143 | 105 |
| TN | 233 | 592 | 377 | 507 | 547 | 562 | 568 | 316 | 222 |
| TX | 132 | 343 | 196 | 275 | 319 | 292 | 263 | 129 | 84 |
| UT | 74 | 191 | 107 | 118 | 128 | 103 | 85 | 43 | 30 |
| National Total | 2.12K | 5.65K | 3.46K | 4.30K | 5.00K | 4.83K | 4.85K | 2.70K | 1.89K |
Nationally, the largest age bands for AMERICAN HLTH CO INC GRP are 6-18 (5.65K), 35-44 (5.00K), 45-54 (4.83K), and 55-64 (4.85K). The <6 band is smaller (2.12K), but still notable, indicating coverage for young families. The >75 band is the smallest (1.89K), suggesting less focus on senior populations.
State-level profiles show Georgia (8.37K) and Iowa (4.57K) with the highest member counts, both skewing toward younger and middle-aged bands. States like Indiana (808) and Utah (879) have much smaller populations, with a similar age distribution but lower overall counts. No state shows a dramatic skew toward older age bands, reinforcing the payer's focus on families and working-age adults.
Estimated Members by State
AMERICAN HLTH CO INC GRP's estimated member distribution is heavily concentrated in Georgia (8.37K), Iowa (4.57K), Tennessee (3.92K), and Kansas (3.78K). These four states together account for a substantial portion of the total estimated membership. States like Missouri (2.50K), Mississippi (3.25K), and Texas (2.03K) also have significant member counts, while Indiana (808) and Utah (879) are at the lower end of the spectrum.
This geographic concentration suggests that AMERICAN HLTH CO INC GRP has a strong regional presence in the Southeast and Midwest, with less penetration in other areas. For providers, this means the payer's impact will be most felt in these states, potentially influencing network design, contracting strategies, and care delivery models. The relatively low member counts in states like Indiana and Utah indicate limited influence in those markets.